BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21509881)

  • 1. On the use of a spin-echo based double inversion recovery acquisition for the measurement of cortical brain thickness.
    Nam Y; Kim EY; Kim DH
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2011 May; 33(5):1218-23. PubMed ID: 21509881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Multislice dark-blood carotid artery wall imaging: a 1.5 T and 3.0 T comparison.
    Koktzoglou I; Chung YC; Mani V; Carroll TJ; Morasch MD; Mizsei G; Simonetti OP; Fayad ZA; Li D
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 May; 23(5):699-705. PubMed ID: 16555260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Susceptibility-resistant variable-flip-angle turbo spin echo imaging for reliable estimation of cortical thickness: a feasibility study.
    Lee H; Kim EY; Yang KS; Park J
    Neuroimage; 2012 Jan; 59(1):377-88. PubMed ID: 21840400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Diffusion-weighted imaging in patients with acute brain ischemia at 3 T: current possibilities and future perspectives comparing conventional echoplanar diffusion-weighted imaging and fast spin echo diffusion-weighted imaging sequences using BLADE (PROPELLER).
    Fries P; Runge VM; Kirchin MA; Stemmer A; Naul LG; Wiliams KD; Reith W; Bücker A; Schneider G
    Invest Radiol; 2009 Jun; 44(6):351-9. PubMed ID: 19363447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Multicontrast black-blood MRI of carotid arteries: comparison between 1.5 and 3 tesla magnetic field strengths.
    Yarnykh VL; Terashima M; Hayes CE; Shimakawa A; Takaya N; Nguyen PK; Brittain JH; McConnell MV; Yuan C
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 May; 23(5):691-8. PubMed ID: 16555259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. T1-weighted fluid-attenuated inversion recovery and T1-weighted fast spin-echo contrast-enhanced imaging: a comparison in 20 patients with brain lesions.
    Al-Saeed O; Ismail M; Athyal RP; Rudwan M; Khafajee S
    J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2009 Aug; 53(4):366-72. PubMed ID: 19695043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Automated patient-specific optimization of three-dimensional double-inversion recovery magnetic resonance imaging.
    Gabr RE; Sun X; Pednekar AS; Narayana PA
    Magn Reson Med; 2016 Feb; 75(2):585-93. PubMed ID: 25761973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Comparison of a T1-weighted inversion-recovery-, gradient-echo- and spin-echo sequence for imaging of the brain at 3.0 Tesla].
    Stehling C; Niederstadt T; Krämer S; Kugel H; Schwindt W; Heindel W; Bachmann R
    Rofo; 2005 Apr; 177(4):536-42. PubMed ID: 15838759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Regional corpus callosum morphometry: effect of field strength and pulse sequence.
    Abdul-Kareem IA; Stancak A; Parkes LM; Sluming V
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2009 Nov; 30(5):1184-90. PubMed ID: 19856453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Double inversion recovery sequence in temporal lobe epilepsy: preliminary results].
    Mahmutyazicioğlu K; Ozdemir H; Savranlar A; Sümer M; Atasoy T; Unal A; Gündoğdu S
    Tani Girisim Radyol; 2004 Sep; 10(3):182-8. PubMed ID: 15470618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Asymmetric spin-echo (ASE) spiral improves BOLD fMRI in inhomogeneous regions.
    Brewer KD; Rioux JA; D'Arcy RC; Bowen CV; Beyea SD
    NMR Biomed; 2009 Jul; 22(6):654-62. PubMed ID: 19382109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fluid and white matter suppression with the MP2RAGE sequence.
    Tanner M; Gambarota G; Kober T; Krueger G; Erritzoe D; Marques JP; Newbould R
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2012 May; 35(5):1063-70. PubMed ID: 22170818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparative analysis of double inversion recovery TFE and TSE sequences on carotid artery wall imaging.
    Chen J; Di YJ; Bu CQ; Zhang YF; Li SH
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Feb; 81(2):223-5. PubMed ID: 21237600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Whole-brain susceptibility mapping at high field: a comparison of multiple- and single-orientation methods.
    Wharton S; Bowtell R
    Neuroimage; 2010 Nov; 53(2):515-25. PubMed ID: 20615474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [The T2-weighted half-Fourier acquired single-shot turbo-spin-echo technic compared to the conventional T2-weighted turbo-spin-echo technic for cerebral magnetic resonance tomography. A sequence comparison].
    Hoffmann KT; Hosten N; Ehrenstein T; Gutberlet M; Röricht S; Felix R
    Rofo; 2000 Jun; 172(6):521-6. PubMed ID: 10916548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Spin-echo T1-weighted imaging of the brain with interleaved acquisition and presaturation pulse at 3 T: a feasibility study before clinical use.
    Kasahara S; Miki Y; Mori N; Urayama S; Kanagaki M; Fushimi Y; Maeda C; Sawamoto N; Fukuyama H; Togashi K
    Acad Radiol; 2009 Jul; 16(7):852-7. PubMed ID: 19375955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fluid-attenuated inversion-recovery SSFP imaging.
    Bangerter NK; Hargreaves BA; Gold GE; Stucker DT; Nishimura DG
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Dec; 24(6):1426-31. PubMed ID: 17036358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Brain tumor enhancement in MR imaging at 3 Tesla: comparison of SNR and CNR gain using TSE and GRE techniques.
    Wintersperger BJ; Runge VM; Biswas J; Reiser MF; Schoenberg SO
    Invest Radiol; 2007 Aug; 42(8):558-63. PubMed ID: 17620938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Double inversion black-blood fast spin-echo imaging of the human heart: a comparison between 1.5T and 3.0T.
    Greenman RL; Shirosky JE; Mulkern RV; Rofsky NM
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2003 Jun; 17(6):648-55. PubMed ID: 12766893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. SENSE factors for reliable cortical thickness measurement.
    Park HJ; Youn T; Jeong SO; Oh MK; Kim SY; Kim EY
    Neuroimage; 2008 Mar; 40(1):187-96. PubMed ID: 18096408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.