118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21510804)
1. Cancer control, continence, and potency after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy beyond the learning and discovery curves.
Eden CG; Arora A; Hutton A
J Endourol; 2011 May; 25(5):815-9. PubMed ID: 21510804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer.
Di Benedetto A; Soares R; Dovey Z; Bott S; McGregor RG; Eden CG
BJU Int; 2015 May; 115(5):780-6. PubMed ID: 24802619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The first 1000 cases of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in the UK: evidence of multiple 'learning curves'.
Eden CG; Neill MG; Louie-Johnsun MW
BJU Int; 2009 May; 103(9):1224-30. PubMed ID: 19021612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Minimum 5-year follow-up of 1138 consecutive laparoscopic radical prostatectomies.
Soares R; Di Benedetto A; Dovey Z; Bott S; McGregor RG; Eden CG
BJU Int; 2015 Apr; 115(4):546-53. PubMed ID: 25098710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy - results of 200 consecutive cases in a Canadian medical institution.
Tse E; Knaus R
Can J Urol; 2004 Apr; 11(2):2172-85. PubMed ID: 15182406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: minimum 3-year follow-up of the first 100 patients in the UK.
Eden CG; Moon DA
BJU Int; 2006 May; 97(5):981-4. PubMed ID: 16643479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The learning curve for laparoscopic extended pelvic lymphadenectomy for intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer: implications for compliance with existing guidelines.
Eden CG; Zacharakis E; Bott S
BJU Int; 2013 Aug; 112(3):346-54. PubMed ID: 23419154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Transition from pure laparoscopic to robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: a single surgeon institutional evolution.
Trabulsi EJ; Zola JC; Gomella LG; Lallas CD
Urol Oncol; 2010; 28(1):81-5. PubMed ID: 20123354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Long-term oncological and continence outcomes after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a single-centre experience.
Busch J; Stephan C; Herold A; Erber B; Kempkensteffen C; Hinz S; Lein M; Weikert S; Miller K; Magheli A
BJU Int; 2012 Dec; 110(11 Pt C):E985-90. PubMed ID: 22672442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Minimally invasive radical prostatectomy: transition from pure laparoscopic to robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Trabulsi EJ; Zola JC; Colon-Herdman A; Heckman JE; Gomella LG; Lallas CD
Arch Esp Urol; 2011 Oct; 64(8):823-9. PubMed ID: 22052763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Is laparoscopic unilateral sural nerve grafting during radical prostatectomy effective in retaining sexual potency?
Porpiglia F; Ragni F; Terrone C; Renard J; Musso F; Grande S; Cracco C; Ghignone G; Scarpa RM
BJU Int; 2005 Jun; 95(9):1267-71. PubMed ID: 15892814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Early biochemical recurrence, urinary continence and potency outcomes following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Berg KD; Thomsen FB; Hvarness H; Christensen IJ; Iversen P
Scand J Urol; 2014 Aug; 48(4):356-66. PubMed ID: 24579803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Bilateral vs unilateral laparoscopic intrafascial nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: evaluation of surgical and functional outcomes in 457 patients.
Greco F; Hoda MR; Wagner S; Reichelt O; Inferrera A; Magno C; Fornara P
BJU Int; 2011 Aug; 108(4):583-7. PubMed ID: 21091973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Beyond the learning curve of the Retzius-sparing approach for robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: oncologic and functional results of the first 200 patients with ≥ 1 year of follow-up.
Galfano A; Di Trapani D; Sozzi F; Strada E; Petralia G; Bramerio M; Ascione A; Gambacorta M; Bocciardi AM
Eur Urol; 2013 Dec; 64(6):974-80. PubMed ID: 23856036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Successful transfer of open surgical skills to a laparoscopic environment using a robotic interface: initial experience with laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
Ahlering TE; Skarecky D; Lee D; Clayman RV
J Urol; 2003 Nov; 170(5):1738-41. PubMed ID: 14532766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of oncological and functional outcomes of pure versus robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy performed by a single surgeon.
Park B; Kim W; Jeong BC; Jeon SS; Lee HM; Choi HY; Seo SI
Scand J Urol; 2013 Feb; 47(1):10-8. PubMed ID: 22835035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Operative details and oncological and functional outcome of robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: 400 cases with a minimum of 12 months follow-up.
Murphy DG; Kerger M; Crowe H; Peters JS; Costello AJ
Eur Urol; 2009 Jun; 55(6):1358-66. PubMed ID: 19147274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Stepwise approach for nerve sparing without countertraction during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: technique and outcomes.
Kowalczyk KJ; Huang AC; Hevelone ND; Lipsitz SR; Yu HY; Ulmer WD; Kaplan JR; Patel S; Nguyen PL; Hu JC
Eur Urol; 2011 Sep; 60(3):536-47. PubMed ID: 21620561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Robot-assisted or pure laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: what is the optimal procedure for the surgical margins? A single center experience.
Koutlidis N; Mourey E; Champigneulle J; Mangin P; Cormier L
Int J Urol; 2012 Dec; 19(12):1076-81. PubMed ID: 22860572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluating the learning curve of experienced laparoscopic surgeons in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Stolzenburg JU; Qazi HA; Holze S; Mende M; Nicolaus M; Franz T; Ho Thi P; Dietel A; Liatsikos E; Do M
J Endourol; 2013 Jan; 27(1):80-5. PubMed ID: 22834963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
