138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21511926)
1. Dynamic hip screw versus DHS blade: a biomechanical comparison of the fixation achieved by each implant in bone.
O'Neill F; Condon F; McGloughlin T; Lenehan B; Coffey JC; Walsh M
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2011 May; 93(5):616-21. PubMed ID: 21511926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The dynamic locking blade plate, a new implant for intracapsular hip fractures: biomechanical comparison with the sliding hip screw and Twin Hook.
Roerdink WH; Aalsma AM; Nijenbanning G; van Walsum AD
Injury; 2009 Mar; 40(3):283-7. PubMed ID: 19193375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Locking plates increase the strength of dynamic hip screws.
Jewell DP; Gheduzzi S; Mitchell MS; Miles AW
Injury; 2008 Feb; 39(2):209-12. PubMed ID: 17880976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Is a helical shaped implant a superior alternative to the Dynamic Hip Screw for unstable femoral neck fractures? A biomechanical investigation.
Windolf M; Braunstein V; Dutoit C; Schwieger K
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2009 Jan; 24(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 18977058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Does cancellous bone compaction due to insertion of a blade implant influence the cut-out resistance? A biomechanical study.
Wähnert D; Gudushauri P; Schiuma D; Richards G; Windolf M
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2010 Dec; 25(10):1053-7. PubMed ID: 20800326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Holding power of variable pitch screws in osteoporotic, osteopenic and normal bone: are all screws created equal?
Ramaswamy R; Evans S; Kosashvili Y
Injury; 2010 Feb; 41(2):179-83. PubMed ID: 19747678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Research advance of dynamic hip screw internal fixation in treatment of intertrochanteric fractures].
Li H; Zhang Y
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2005 Oct; 19(10):839-42. PubMed ID: 16274138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A biomechanical comparison of locked plate fixation with percutaneous insertion capability versus the angled blade plate in a subtrochanteric fracture gap model.
Crist BD; Khalafi A; Hazelwood SJ; Lee MA
J Orthop Trauma; 2009 Oct; 23(9):622-7. PubMed ID: 19897982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biomechanical characterisation of osteosyntheses for proximal femur fractures: helical blade versus screw.
Al-Munajjed AA; Hammer J; Mayr E; Nerlich M; Lenich A
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2008; 133():1-10. PubMed ID: 18376008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Biomechanical evaluation of dynamic hip screw with bone cement augmentation in normal bone].
Li N; Peng A; Chai Y
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2007 Dec; 21(12):1299-301. PubMed ID: 18277669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biomechanical comparison of proximal locking plates and blade plates for the treatment of comminuted subtrochanteric femoral fractures.
Floyd JC; O'Toole RV; Stall A; Forward DP; Nabili M; Shillingburg D; Hsieh A; Nascone JW
J Orthop Trauma; 2009 Oct; 23(9):628-33. PubMed ID: 19897983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sliding hip screw versus sliding helical blade for intertrochanteric fractures: a propensity score-matched case control study.
Fang C; Lau TW; Wong TM; Lee HL; Leung F
Bone Joint J; 2015 Mar; 97-B(3):398-404. PubMed ID: 25737525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biomechanical Evaluation of the Femoral Neck System in Unstable Pauwels III Femoral Neck Fractures: A Comparison with the Dynamic Hip Screw and Cannulated Screws.
Stoffel K; Zderic I; Gras F; Sommer C; Eberli U; Mueller D; Oswald M; Gueorguiev B
J Orthop Trauma; 2017 Mar; 31(3):131-137. PubMed ID: 27755333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Quantification of cancellous bone-compaction due to DHS Blade insertion and influence upon cut-out resistance.
Windolf M; Muths R; Braunstein V; Gueorguiev B; Hänni M; Schwieger K
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2009 Jan; 24(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 19012997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A biomechanical study comparing helical blade with screw design for sliding hip fixations of unstable intertrochanteric fractures.
Luo Q; Yuen G; Lau TW; Yeung K; Leung F
ScientificWorldJournal; 2013; 2013():351936. PubMed ID: 23509433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. First clinical and biomechanical results of the Trochanteric Fixation Nail (TFN).
Lenich A; Fierlbeck J; Al-Munajjed A; Dendorfer S; Mai R; Füchtmeier B; Mayr E; Hammer J
Technol Health Care; 2006; 14(4-5):403-9. PubMed ID: 17065761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Simplified valgisation osteosynthesis of unstable pertrochanteric femoral fractures with a 150 degree dynamic hip screw (DHS)].
Ruf W; Friedl W; Manner M
Chirurg; 1986 May; 57(5):344-7. PubMed ID: 3731939
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Stress test and clinical application of the minimal-invasive dynamic hip screw].
Tong SL; Chen JL; Lu WJ; Pan ZJ; Wang YJ
Zhongguo Gu Shang; 2008 May; 21(5):334-6. PubMed ID: 19108453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Development of static three dimensional screw-plate system and the biomechanic features thereof, a comparative study].
Liang JY; Li KH; Liao QD; Zhu Y; Hu YH; Lei GH
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2009 Jan; 89(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 19489236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [A comparative study of unstable per- and intertrochanteric femoral fractures treated with dynamic hip screw (DHS) and trochanteric butt-press plate vs. proximal femoral nail (PFN)].
Klinger HM; Baums MH; Eckert M; Neugebauer R
Zentralbl Chir; 2005 Aug; 130(4):301-6. PubMed ID: 16103953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
