These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

268 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21511928)

  • 1. The position and orientation of total knee replacement components: a comparison of conventional radiographs, transverse 2D-CT slices and 3D-CT reconstruction.
    Hirschmann MT; Konala P; Amsler F; Iranpour F; Friederich NF; Cobb JP
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2011 May; 93(5):629-33. PubMed ID: 21511928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Intra- and interobserver reliability and agreement in three-dimensional computed tomography measurements of component positions after total knee arthroplasty.
    Yoshino K; Hagiwara S; Nakamura J; Tsukeoka T; Tsuneizumi Y; Ohtori S
    Knee; 2019 Oct; 26(5):1102-1110. PubMed ID: 31340892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Inter-observer reliability of measurements performed on digital long-leg standing radiographs and assessment of validity compared to 3D CT-scan.
    Boonen B; Kerens B; Schotanus MG; Emans P; Jong B; Kort NP
    Knee; 2016 Jan; 23(1):20-4. PubMed ID: 26746040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quantification of the difference between 3D CT and plain radiograph for measurement of the position of medial unicompartmental knee replacements.
    Holme TJ; Henckel J; Cobb J; Hart AJ
    Knee; 2011 Oct; 18(5):300-5. PubMed ID: 20926299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reliability of measurements performed on two dimensional and three dimensional computed tomography in glenoid assessment for instability.
    Kubicka AM; Stefaniak J; Lubiatowski P; Długosz J; Dzianach M; Redman M; Piontek J; Romanowski L
    Int Orthop; 2016 Dec; 40(12):2581-2588. PubMed ID: 27492723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. How to assess femoral and tibial component rotation after total knee arthroplasty with computed tomography: a systematic review.
    De Valk EJ; Noorduyn JC; Mutsaerts EL
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2016 Nov; 24(11):3517-3528. PubMed ID: 27655141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. 4D-SPECT/CT in orthopaedics: a new method of combined quantitative volumetric 3D analysis of SPECT/CT tracer uptake and component position measurements in patients after total knee arthroplasty.
    Rasch H; Falkowski AL; Forrer F; Henckel J; Hirschmann MT
    Skeletal Radiol; 2013 Sep; 42(9):1215-23. PubMed ID: 23695806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Intra- and inter-observer reliability of implant positioning evaluation on a CT-based three-dimensional postoperative matching system for total knee arthroplasty.
    Watanabe S; Akagi R; Shiko Y; Ono Y; Kawasaki Y; Ohdera T; Ohtori S; Sasho T
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2021 Apr; 22(1):363. PubMed ID: 33865360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of femoral component rotation after total knee arthroplasty in Kanekasu radiographs, axial CT slices and 3D reconstructed images.
    Robertson EL; Hengherr M; Amsler F; Hirschmann MT; Mathis DT
    Skeletal Radiol; 2021 Jul; 50(7):1389-1397. PubMed ID: 33398456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of robot-assisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty: a controlled cadaver study using multiparameter quantitative three-dimensional CT assessment of alignment.
    Moon YW; Ha CW; Do KH; Kim CY; Han JH; Na SE; Lee CH; Kim JG; Park YS
    Comput Aided Surg; 2012; 17(2):86-95. PubMed ID: 22348661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Three-dimensional assessment of lower limb alignment: Accuracy and reliability.
    Fürmetz J; Sass J; Ferreira T; Jalali J; Kovacs L; Mück F; Degen N; Thaller PH
    Knee; 2019 Jan; 26(1):185-193. PubMed ID: 30473372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Skeletal landmarks for TKR implantations: evaluation of their accuracy using EOS imaging acquisition system.
    Schlatterer B; Suedhoff I; Bonnet X; Catonne Y; Maestro M; Skalli W
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2009 Feb; 95(1):2-11. PubMed ID: 19251231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Is computed tomography an accurate and reliable method for measuring total knee arthroplasty component rotation?
    Figueroa J; Guarachi JP; Matas J; Arnander M; Orrego M
    Int Orthop; 2016 Apr; 40(4):709-14. PubMed ID: 26206260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Preoperative CT-Based Three-Dimensional Templating in Robot-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty More Accurately Predicts Implant Sizes than Two-Dimensional Templating.
    Pietrzak JRT; Rowan FE; Kayani B; Donaldson MJ; Huq SS; Haddad FS
    J Knee Surg; 2019 Jul; 32(7):642-648. PubMed ID: 30068010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Computed Tomography Techniques Help Understand Wear Patterns in Retrieved Total Knee Arthroplasty.
    Cerquiglini A; Henckel J; Hothi HS; Dall'Ava L; Shearing P; Hirschmann MT; Hart AJ
    J Arthroplasty; 2018 Sep; 33(9):3030-3037. PubMed ID: 29754982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Computerized tomography assessment of femoral and tibial rotation in total knee prosthesis].
    Rimondi E; Molinari M; Moio A; Busacca M; Trentani F; Trentani P; Tigani D; Nigrisoli M
    Radiol Med; 2000 Jun; 99(6):420-5. PubMed ID: 11262817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Inter- and intraobserver reliability of two-dimensional CT scan for total knee arthroplasty component malrotation.
    Konigsberg B; Hess R; Hartman C; Smith L; Garvin KL
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2014 Jan; 472(1):212-7. PubMed ID: 23813180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessment of prosthesis alignment after revision total knee arthroplasty using EOS 2D and 3D imaging: a reliability study.
    Meijer MF; Boerboom AL; Stevens M; Bulstra SK; Reininga IH
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(9):e104613. PubMed ID: 25247714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of implant alignment in navigated unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a comparison of 2D and 3D imaging.
    Ishida K; Toda A; Shibanuma N; Matsumoto T; Kuroda R; Kurosaka M
    Acta Orthop Belg; 2015 Dec; 81(4):654-61. PubMed ID: 26790787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A novel standardized algorithm using SPECT/CT evaluating unhappy patients after unicondylar knee arthroplasty--a combined analysis of tracer uptake distribution and component position.
    Suter B; Testa E; Stämpfli P; Konala P; Rasch H; Friederich NF; Hirschmann MT
    BMC Med Imaging; 2015 Mar; 15():11. PubMed ID: 25886040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.