These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

393 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21512189)

  • 1. Estimating expected value of sample information for incomplete data models using Bayesian approximation.
    Kharroubi SA; Brennan A; Strong M
    Med Decis Making; 2011; 31(6):839-52. PubMed ID: 21512189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Efficient computation of partial expected value of sample information using Bayesian approximation.
    Brennan A; Kharroubi SA
    J Health Econ; 2007 Jan; 26(1):122-48. PubMed ID: 16945438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Expected value of sample information for Weibull survival data.
    Brennan A; Kharroubi SA
    Health Econ; 2007 Nov; 16(11):1205-25. PubMed ID: 17328046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Efficient Monte Carlo Estimation of the Expected Value of Sample Information Using Moment Matching.
    Heath A; Manolopoulou I; Baio G
    Med Decis Making; 2018 Feb; 38(2):163-173. PubMed ID: 29126364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An Efficient Method for Computing Expected Value of Sample Information for Survival Data from an Ongoing Trial.
    Vervaart M; Strong M; Claxton KP; Welton NJ; Wisløff T; Aas E
    Med Decis Making; 2022 Jul; 42(5):612-625. PubMed ID: 34967237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Calculating the Expected Value of Sample Information in Practice: Considerations from 3 Case Studies.
    Heath A; Kunst N; Jackson C; Strong M; Alarid-Escudero F; Goldhaber-Fiebert JD; Baio G; Menzies NA; Jalal H
    Med Decis Making; 2020 Apr; 40(3):314-326. PubMed ID: 32297840
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A simple introduction to Markov Chain Monte-Carlo sampling.
    van Ravenzwaaij D; Cassey P; Brown SD
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Feb; 25(1):143-154. PubMed ID: 26968853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accurate EVSI Estimation for Nonlinear Models Using the Gaussian Approximation Method.
    Li L; Jalal H; Heath A
    Med Decis Making; 2024 Jul; ():272989X241264287. PubMed ID: 39082512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A gradient Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithm for computing multivariate maximum likelihood estimates and posterior distributions: mixture dose-response assessment.
    Li R; Englehardt JD; Li X
    Risk Anal; 2012 Feb; 32(2):345-59. PubMed ID: 21906114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Multilevel and Quasi Monte Carlo Methods for the Calculation of the Expected Value of Partial Perfect Information.
    Fang W; Wang Z; Giles MB; Jackson CH; Welton NJ; Andrieu C; Thom H
    Med Decis Making; 2022 Feb; 42(2):168-181. PubMed ID: 34231446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Estimating the Expected Value of Sample Information Using the Probabilistic Sensitivity Analysis Sample: A Fast, Nonparametric Regression-Based Method.
    Strong M; Oakley JE; Brennan A; Breeze P
    Med Decis Making; 2015 Jul; 35(5):570-83. PubMed ID: 25810269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An optimization approach to calculating sample sizes with binary responses.
    Maroufy V; Marriott P; Pezeshk H
    J Biopharm Stat; 2014; 24(4):715-31. PubMed ID: 24697665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Estimating the Expected Value of Sample Information across Different Sample Sizes Using Moment Matching and Nonlinear Regression.
    Heath A; Manolopoulou I; Baio G
    Med Decis Making; 2019 May; 39(4):346-358. PubMed ID: 31161867
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Phylogenetic MCMC algorithms are misleading on mixtures of trees.
    Mossel E; Vigoda E
    Science; 2005 Sep; 309(5744):2207-9. PubMed ID: 16195459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Efficient Markov chain Monte Carlo methods for decoding neural spike trains.
    Ahmadian Y; Pillow JW; Paninski L
    Neural Comput; 2011 Jan; 23(1):46-96. PubMed ID: 20964539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Applying diffusion-based Markov chain Monte Carlo.
    Herbei R; Paul R; Berliner LM
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(3):e0173453. PubMed ID: 28301529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Risk-based environmental remediation: Bayesian Monte Carlo analysis and the expected value of sample information.
    Dakins ME; Toll JE; Small MJ; Brand KP
    Risk Anal; 1996 Feb; 16(1):67-79. PubMed ID: 8868224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Calculating the Expected Value of Sample Information Using Efficient Nested Monte Carlo: A Tutorial.
    Heath A; Baio G
    Value Health; 2018 Nov; 21(11):1299-1304. PubMed ID: 30442277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Exploring fast computational strategies for probabilistic phylogenetic analysis.
    Rodrigue N; Philippe H; Lartillot N
    Syst Biol; 2007 Oct; 56(5):711-26. PubMed ID: 17849326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Parametric and nonparametric population methods: their comparative performance in analysing a clinical dataset and two Monte Carlo simulation studies.
    Bustad A; Terziivanov D; Leary R; Port R; Schumitzky A; Jelliffe R
    Clin Pharmacokinet; 2006; 45(4):365-83. PubMed ID: 16584284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.