These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21512611)
1. Bayesian Random Segmentation Models to Identify Shared Copy Number Aberrations for Array CGH Data. Baladandayuthapani V; Ji Y; Talluri R; Nieto-Barajas LE; Morris JS J Am Stat Assoc; 2010 Dec; 105(492):1358-1375. PubMed ID: 21512611 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Estimating Shared Copy Number Aberrations for Array CGH Data: The Linear-Median Method. Lin YX; Baladandayuthapani V; Bonato V; Do KA Cancer Inform; 2010 Oct; 9():229-49. PubMed ID: 21082039 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Stochastic segmentation models for array-based comparative genomic hybridization data analysis. Lai TL; Xing H; Zhang N Biostatistics; 2008 Apr; 9(2):290-307. PubMed ID: 17855472 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Improved Statistical Analysis for Array CGH-Based DNA Copy Number Aberrations. Jiang H; Zhu ZZ; Yu Y; Lin S; Hou L Cancer Inform; 2011; 10():249-58. PubMed ID: 22084565 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Bayesian disease classification using copy number data. Guha S; Ji Y; Baladandayuthapani V Cancer Inform; 2014; 13(Suppl 2):83-91. PubMed ID: 25336897 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Modeling recurrent DNA copy number alterations in array CGH data. Shah SP; Lam WL; Ng RT; Murphy KP Bioinformatics; 2007 Jul; 23(13):i450-8. PubMed ID: 17646330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Robust smooth segmentation approach for array CGH data analysis. Huang J; Gusnanto A; O'Sullivan K; Staaf J; Borg A; Pawitan Y Bioinformatics; 2007 Sep; 23(18):2463-9. PubMed ID: 17660206 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. High resolution analysis of DNA copy number variation using comparative genomic hybridization to microarrays. Pinkel D; Segraves R; Sudar D; Clark S; Poole I; Kowbel D; Collins C; Kuo WL; Chen C; Zhai Y; Dairkee SH; Ljung BM; Gray JW; Albertson DG Nat Genet; 1998 Oct; 20(2):207-11. PubMed ID: 9771718 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A statistical change point model approach for the detection of DNA copy number variations in array CGH data. Chen J; Wang YP IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2009; 6(4):529-41. PubMed ID: 19875853 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. CGHsweep: an algorithm for analyzing chromosomal aberrations in genome using aCGH profiles. Karmaker A; Kwek S In Silico Biol; 2007; 7(6):639-49. PubMed ID: 18467776 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A fused lasso latent feature model for analyzing multi-sample aCGH data. Nowak G; Hastie T; Pollack JR; Tibshirani R Biostatistics; 2011 Oct; 12(4):776-91. PubMed ID: 21642389 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sequential model selection-based segmentation to detect DNA copy number variation. Hu J; Zhang L; Wang HJ Biometrics; 2016 Sep; 72(3):815-26. PubMed ID: 26954760 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Genomic alterations of chromosome region 11p as predictive marker by array comparative genomic hybridization in lung adenocarcinoma patients. Sung JS; Park KH; Kim YH Cancer Genet Cytogenet; 2010 Apr; 198(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 20303011 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The use of ultra-dense array CGH analysis for the discovery of micro-copy number alterations and gene fusions in the cancer genome. Przybytkowski E; Ferrario C; Basik M BMC Med Genomics; 2011 Jan; 4():16. PubMed ID: 21272361 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Detecting copy number variations from array CGH data based on a conditional random field model. Yin XL; Li J J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2010 Apr; 8(2):295-314. PubMed ID: 20401947 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Integrating copy number polymorphisms into array CGH analysis using a robust HMM. Shah SP; Xuan X; DeLeeuw RJ; Khojasteh M; Lam WL; Ng R; Murphy KP Bioinformatics; 2006 Jul; 22(14):e431-9. PubMed ID: 16873504 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Micro-scale genomic DNA copy number aberrations as another means of mutagenesis in breast cancer. Chao HH; He X; Parker JS; Zhao W; Perou CM PLoS One; 2012; 7(12):e51719. PubMed ID: 23284754 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A bayesian analysis for identifying DNA copy number variations using a compound poisson process. Chen J; Yiğiter A; Wang YP; Deng HW EURASIP J Bioinform Syst Biol; 2010; 2010(1):268513. PubMed ID: 20976296 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Computational methods for identification of recurrent copy number alteration patterns by array CGH. Shah SP Cytogenet Genome Res; 2008; 123(1-4):343-51. PubMed ID: 19287173 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Genome-wide analysis of DNA copy-number changes using cDNA microarrays. Pollack JR; Perou CM; Alizadeh AA; Eisen MB; Pergamenschikov A; Williams CF; Jeffrey SS; Botstein D; Brown PO Nat Genet; 1999 Sep; 23(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 10471496 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]