These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21512626)

  • 1. Comparison of Plateletpheresis on the Fenwal Amicus and Fresenius Com.Tec Cell Separators.
    Altuntas F; Sari I; Kocyigit I; Kaynar L; Hacioglu S; Ozturk A; Oztekin M; Solmaz M; Eser B; Cetin M; Unal A
    Transfus Med Hemother; 2008; 35(5):368-373. PubMed ID: 21512626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of double dose plateletpheresis on the Fenwal Amicus, Fresenius COM.TEC and Trima Accel cell separators.
    Keklik M; Eser B; Kaynar L; Solmaz M; Ozturk A; Yay M; Birekul A; Oztekin M; Sivgin S; Cetin M; Unal A
    Transfus Apher Sci; 2014 Oct; 51(2):193-6. PubMed ID: 25219639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of plateletpheresis on the Fenwal Amicus, Fresenius COM.TEC, and Trima Accel Cell separators.
    Keklik M; Eser B; Kaynar L; Sivgin S; Keklik E; Solmaz M; Ozturk A; Buyukoglan R; Yay M; Cetin M; Unal A
    J Clin Apher; 2015 Jun; 30(3):171-5. PubMed ID: 25230340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparative Analysis of Various Aspects of Plateletpheresis on the Fenwal Amicus and Fresenius COM.TEC Cell Separator Instruments.
    Philip J; Biswas AK; Chatterjee T; Mallhi RS
    Lab Med; 2014; 45(4):315-23. PubMed ID: 25316663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of the Fenwal Amicus and Fresenius Com.Tec cell separators for autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell collection.
    Altuntas F; Kocyigit I; Ozturk A; Kaynar L; Sari I; Oztekin M; Solmaz M; Eser B; Cetin M; Unal A
    Transfus Apher Sci; 2007 Apr; 36(2):159-67. PubMed ID: 17369096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Type of Cell Separator, Fenwal Amicus vs Fresenius Com Tec, May Influence the Corpuscular Elements Value of the Donor`s Blood.
    Landzo E; Aganovic-Musinovic I; Bevanda D; Bogut A; Bevanda M; Bevanda Glibo D; Pravdić D
    Psychiatr Danub; 2019 Dec; 31(Suppl 5):821-825. PubMed ID: 32160178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Plateletapheresis with a next generation blood cell separator.
    Burgstaler EA; Pineda AA; Potter BM; Brown R
    J Clin Apher; 1997; 12(2):55-62. PubMed ID: 9263111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prospective comparison of plateletapheresis using four apheresis systems on the same donors.
    Burgstaler EA; Pineda AA; Bryant SC
    J Clin Apher; 1999; 14(4):163-70. PubMed ID: 10611625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Platelet collection with the Amicus and the AS.TEC 204 blood cell separators.
    Moog R; Müller N; Goergens D
    Transfusion; 1998 Mar; 38(3):285-9. PubMed ID: 9563409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of plateletpheresis on three continuous flow cell separators.
    Tendulkar A; Rajadhyaksha SB
    Asian J Transfus Sci; 2009 Jul; 3(2):73-7. PubMed ID: 20808650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prospective, paired crossover comparison of multiple, single-needle plateletpheresis procedures with the Amicus and Trima Accel cell separators.
    Fontana S; Mordasini L; Keller P; Taleghani BM
    Transfusion; 2006 Nov; 46(11):2004-10. PubMed ID: 17076857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cost effectiveness of quality assurance in plateletpheresis.
    Moog R; Müller N
    Transfus Sci; 1999 Oct; 21(2):141-5. PubMed ID: 10747522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Frequently used plateletpheresis techniques result in variable target yields and platelet recruitment of donors.
    Strasser EF; Schuster M; Egler K; Bauer J; Weisbach V; Ringwald J; Zimmermann R; Zingsem J; Eckstein R
    Transfusion; 2005 May; 45(5):788-97. PubMed ID: 15847670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of a new apheresis system for the collection of leukoreduced single-donor platelets.
    Zingsem J; Strasser E; Ringwald J; Zimmermann R; Weisbach V; Eckstein R
    Transfusion; 2007 Jun; 47(6):987-94. PubMed ID: 17524087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. First comparative evaluation of a new leukapheresis technology in non-cytokine-stimulated donors.
    Steininger PA; Strasser EF; Weiss D; Achenbach S; Zimmermann R; Eckstein R
    Vox Sang; 2014 Apr; 106(3):248-55. PubMed ID: 24152115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Apheresis technology correlates with bacterial contamination of platelets and reported septic transfusion reactions.
    Eder AF; Dy BA; DeMerse B; Wagner SJ; Stramer SL; O'Neill EM; Herron RM
    Transfusion; 2017 Dec; 57(12):2969-2976. PubMed ID: 28880363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of the in vitro storage properties of Amicus apheresis platelets collected using single- and double-needle procedures from the same donors.
    Wagner SJ; Seetharaman S; Kurtz J
    Transfusion; 2012 Mar; 52(3):524-8. PubMed ID: 21880047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Severe CD4+ T-cell lymphopenia is not observed in frequent plateletpheresis donors collected on the Fenwal Amicus.
    Gansner JM; Papari M; Goldstein J; Gaufberg RA; Neuberg D; Makar RS; Kaufman RM
    Transfusion; 2019 Sep; 59(9):2783-2787. PubMed ID: 31271458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Plateletapheresis: comparison of processing times, platelet yields, and white blood cell content with several commonly used systems.
    Burgstaler EA; Pineda AA; Wollan P
    J Clin Apher; 1997; 12(4):170-8. PubMed ID: 9483178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. White cell reduction during plateletpheresis: a comparison of three blood cell separators.
    Moog R; Müller N
    Transfusion; 1999 Jun; 39(6):572-7. PubMed ID: 10378836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.