155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21512626)
1. Comparison of Plateletpheresis on the Fenwal Amicus and Fresenius Com.Tec Cell Separators.
Altuntas F; Sari I; Kocyigit I; Kaynar L; Hacioglu S; Ozturk A; Oztekin M; Solmaz M; Eser B; Cetin M; Unal A
Transfus Med Hemother; 2008; 35(5):368-373. PubMed ID: 21512626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of double dose plateletpheresis on the Fenwal Amicus, Fresenius COM.TEC and Trima Accel cell separators.
Keklik M; Eser B; Kaynar L; Solmaz M; Ozturk A; Yay M; Birekul A; Oztekin M; Sivgin S; Cetin M; Unal A
Transfus Apher Sci; 2014 Oct; 51(2):193-6. PubMed ID: 25219639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of plateletpheresis on the Fenwal Amicus, Fresenius COM.TEC, and Trima Accel Cell separators.
Keklik M; Eser B; Kaynar L; Sivgin S; Keklik E; Solmaz M; Ozturk A; Buyukoglan R; Yay M; Cetin M; Unal A
J Clin Apher; 2015 Jun; 30(3):171-5. PubMed ID: 25230340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative Analysis of Various Aspects of Plateletpheresis on the Fenwal Amicus and Fresenius COM.TEC Cell Separator Instruments.
Philip J; Biswas AK; Chatterjee T; Mallhi RS
Lab Med; 2014; 45(4):315-23. PubMed ID: 25316663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of the Fenwal Amicus and Fresenius Com.Tec cell separators for autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell collection.
Altuntas F; Kocyigit I; Ozturk A; Kaynar L; Sari I; Oztekin M; Solmaz M; Eser B; Cetin M; Unal A
Transfus Apher Sci; 2007 Apr; 36(2):159-67. PubMed ID: 17369096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Type of Cell Separator, Fenwal Amicus vs Fresenius Com Tec, May Influence the Corpuscular Elements Value of the Donor`s Blood.
Landzo E; Aganovic-Musinovic I; Bevanda D; Bogut A; Bevanda M; Bevanda Glibo D; Pravdić D
Psychiatr Danub; 2019 Dec; 31(Suppl 5):821-825. PubMed ID: 32160178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Plateletapheresis with a next generation blood cell separator.
Burgstaler EA; Pineda AA; Potter BM; Brown R
J Clin Apher; 1997; 12(2):55-62. PubMed ID: 9263111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prospective comparison of plateletapheresis using four apheresis systems on the same donors.
Burgstaler EA; Pineda AA; Bryant SC
J Clin Apher; 1999; 14(4):163-70. PubMed ID: 10611625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Platelet collection with the Amicus and the AS.TEC 204 blood cell separators.
Moog R; Müller N; Goergens D
Transfusion; 1998 Mar; 38(3):285-9. PubMed ID: 9563409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of plateletpheresis on three continuous flow cell separators.
Tendulkar A; Rajadhyaksha SB
Asian J Transfus Sci; 2009 Jul; 3(2):73-7. PubMed ID: 20808650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prospective, paired crossover comparison of multiple, single-needle plateletpheresis procedures with the Amicus and Trima Accel cell separators.
Fontana S; Mordasini L; Keller P; Taleghani BM
Transfusion; 2006 Nov; 46(11):2004-10. PubMed ID: 17076857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cost effectiveness of quality assurance in plateletpheresis.
Moog R; Müller N
Transfus Sci; 1999 Oct; 21(2):141-5. PubMed ID: 10747522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Frequently used plateletpheresis techniques result in variable target yields and platelet recruitment of donors.
Strasser EF; Schuster M; Egler K; Bauer J; Weisbach V; Ringwald J; Zimmermann R; Zingsem J; Eckstein R
Transfusion; 2005 May; 45(5):788-97. PubMed ID: 15847670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of a new apheresis system for the collection of leukoreduced single-donor platelets.
Zingsem J; Strasser E; Ringwald J; Zimmermann R; Weisbach V; Eckstein R
Transfusion; 2007 Jun; 47(6):987-94. PubMed ID: 17524087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. First comparative evaluation of a new leukapheresis technology in non-cytokine-stimulated donors.
Steininger PA; Strasser EF; Weiss D; Achenbach S; Zimmermann R; Eckstein R
Vox Sang; 2014 Apr; 106(3):248-55. PubMed ID: 24152115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Apheresis technology correlates with bacterial contamination of platelets and reported septic transfusion reactions.
Eder AF; Dy BA; DeMerse B; Wagner SJ; Stramer SL; O'Neill EM; Herron RM
Transfusion; 2017 Dec; 57(12):2969-2976. PubMed ID: 28880363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of the in vitro storage properties of Amicus apheresis platelets collected using single- and double-needle procedures from the same donors.
Wagner SJ; Seetharaman S; Kurtz J
Transfusion; 2012 Mar; 52(3):524-8. PubMed ID: 21880047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Severe CD4+ T-cell lymphopenia is not observed in frequent plateletpheresis donors collected on the Fenwal Amicus.
Gansner JM; Papari M; Goldstein J; Gaufberg RA; Neuberg D; Makar RS; Kaufman RM
Transfusion; 2019 Sep; 59(9):2783-2787. PubMed ID: 31271458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Plateletapheresis: comparison of processing times, platelet yields, and white blood cell content with several commonly used systems.
Burgstaler EA; Pineda AA; Wollan P
J Clin Apher; 1997; 12(4):170-8. PubMed ID: 9483178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. White cell reduction during plateletpheresis: a comparison of three blood cell separators.
Moog R; Müller N
Transfusion; 1999 Jun; 39(6):572-7. PubMed ID: 10378836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
