110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21513805)
1. Manual, semi-automated, and automated delineation of chronic brain lesions: a comparison of methods.
Wilke M; de Haan B; Juenger H; Karnath HO
Neuroimage; 2011 Jun; 56(4):2038-46. PubMed ID: 21513805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of different automated methods for the detection of white matter lesions in MRI data.
Klöppel S; Abdulkadir A; Hadjidemetriou S; Issleib S; Frings L; Thanh TN; Mader I; Teipel SJ; Hüll M; Ronneberger O
Neuroimage; 2011 Jul; 57(2):416-22. PubMed ID: 21569857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fast semi-automated lesion demarcation in stroke.
de Haan B; Clas P; Juenger H; Wilke M; Karnath HO
Neuroimage Clin; 2015; 9():69-74. PubMed ID: 26413473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Manual validation of FreeSurfer's automated hippocampal segmentation in normal aging, mild cognitive impairment, and Alzheimer Disease subjects.
Sánchez-Benavides G; Gómez-Ansón B; Sainz A; Vives Y; Delfino M; Peña-Casanova J
Psychiatry Res; 2010 Mar; 181(3):219-25. PubMed ID: 20153146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of accuracy in MS lesion volumetry using realistic lesion phantoms.
Rexilius J; Hahn HK; Schlüter M; Bourquain H; Peitgen HO
Acad Radiol; 2005 Jan; 12(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 15691722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Voxel-based Gaussian naïve Bayes classification of ischemic stroke lesions in individual T1-weighted MRI scans.
Griffis JC; Allendorfer JB; Szaflarski JP
J Neurosci Methods; 2016 Jan; 257():97-108. PubMed ID: 26432931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Can voxel based morphometry, manual segmentation and automated segmentation equally detect hippocampal volume differences in acute depression?
Bergouignan L; Chupin M; Czechowska Y; Kinkingnéhun S; Lemogne C; Le Bastard G; Lepage M; Garnero L; Colliot O; Fossati P
Neuroimage; 2009 Mar; 45(1):29-37. PubMed ID: 19071222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of manual direct and automated indirect measurement of hippocampus using magnetic resonance imaging.
Giesel FL; Thomann PA; Hahn HK; Politi M; Stieltjes B; Weber MA; Pantel J; Wilkinson ID; Griffiths PD; Schröder J; Essig M
Eur J Radiol; 2008 May; 66(2):268-73. PubMed ID: 17643890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A novel method for automatic determination of different stages of multiple sclerosis lesions in brain MR FLAIR images.
Khayati R; Vafadust M; Towhidkhah F; Nabavi SM
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2008 Mar; 32(2):124-33. PubMed ID: 18055174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An evaluation of four automatic methods of segmenting the subcortical structures in the brain.
Babalola KO; Patenaude B; Aljabar P; Schnabel J; Kennedy D; Crum W; Smith S; Cootes T; Jenkinson M; Rueckert D
Neuroimage; 2009 Oct; 47(4):1435-47. PubMed ID: 19463960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fully automatic segmentation of multiple sclerosis lesions in brain MR FLAIR images using adaptive mixtures method and Markov random field model.
Khayati R; Vafadust M; Towhidkhah F; Nabavi M
Comput Biol Med; 2008 Mar; 38(3):379-90. PubMed ID: 18262511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Automated perfusion-weighted MRI using localized arterial input functions.
Lorenz C; Benner T; Chen PJ; Lopez CJ; Ay H; Zhu MW; Menezes NM; Aronen H; Karonen J; Liu Y; Nuutinen J; Sorensen AG
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Nov; 24(5):1133-9. PubMed ID: 16969793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Unsupervised fully automated inline analysis of global left ventricular function in CINE MR imaging.
Theisen D; Sandner TA; Bauner K; Hayes C; Rist C; Reiser MF; Wintersperger BJ
Invest Radiol; 2009 Aug; 44(8):463-8. PubMed ID: 19561514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The average pathlength map: a diffusion MRI tractography-derived index for studying brain pathology.
Pannek K; Mathias JL; Bigler ED; Brown G; Taylor JD; Rose SE
Neuroimage; 2011 Mar; 55(1):133-41. PubMed ID: 21147236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Automatic segmentation of different-sized white matter lesions by voxel probability estimation.
Anbeek P; Vincken KL; van Osch MJ; Bisschops RH; van der Grond J
Med Image Anal; 2004 Sep; 8(3):205-15. PubMed ID: 15450216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Lesion location alters brain activation in chronically impaired stroke survivors.
Luft AR; Waller S; Forrester L; Smith GV; Whitall J; Macko RF; Schulz JB; Hanley DF
Neuroimage; 2004 Mar; 21(3):924-35. PubMed ID: 15006659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Approaches to segment multiple-sclerosis lesions on conventional brain MRI].
Souplet JC; Lebrun C; Chanalet S; Ayache N; Malandain G
Rev Neurol (Paris); 2009 Jan; 165(1):7-14. PubMed ID: 18808780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy and reproducibility of manual and semiautomated quantification of MS lesions by MRI.
Ashton EA; Takahashi C; Berg MJ; Goodman A; Totterman S; Ekholm S
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2003 Mar; 17(3):300-8. PubMed ID: 12594719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Measurement of brain atrophy in subcortical vascular disease: a comparison of different approaches and the impact of ischaemic lesions.
O'Sullivan M; Jouvent E; Saemann PG; Mangin JF; Viswanathan A; Gschwendtner A; Bracoud L; Pachai C; Chabriat H; Dichgans M
Neuroimage; 2008 Nov; 43(2):312-20. PubMed ID: 18722537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Enhancing lesions of the brain: intraindividual crossover comparison of contrast enhancement after gadobenate dimeglumine versus established gadolinium comparators.
Essig M; Tartaro A; Tartaglione T; Pirovano G; Kirchin MA; Spinazzi A
Acad Radiol; 2006 Jun; 13(6):744-51. PubMed ID: 16679277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
