These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21514520)

  • 1. Radial force measurements in carotid stents: influence of stent design and length of the lesion.
    Voûte MT; Hendriks JM; van Laanen JH; Pattynama PM; Muhs BE; Poldermans D; Verhagen HJ
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2011 May; 22(5):661-6. PubMed ID: 21514520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Experimental investigation of modern and established carotid stents.
    Wissgott C; Schmidt W; Behrens P; Brandt C; Schmitz KP; Andresen R
    Rofo; 2014 Feb; 186(2):157-65. PubMed ID: 23996621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of stent type on hemodynamic depression after carotid artery stent placement.
    Diehm N; Katzen BT; Dick F; Kovacs M; Zemel G; Powell A; Samuels S; Benenati JF
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2008 Jan; 19(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 18192464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Initial Clinical Results and In Vitro Testing of the New CGuard MicroNet-Covered "One-Size-Fits-All" Carotid Stent.
    Wissgott C; Brandt-Wunderlich C; Kopetsch C; Schmidt W; Andresen R
    J Endovasc Ther; 2019 Aug; 26(4):578-582. PubMed ID: 31060430
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical Results and Mechanical Properties of the Carotid CGUARD Double-Layered Embolic Prevention Stent.
    Wissgott C; Schmidt W; Brandt-Wunderlich C; Behrens P; Andresen R
    J Endovasc Ther; 2017 Feb; 24(1):130-137. PubMed ID: 27733689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Simulated Bench Testing to Evaluate the Mechanical Performance of New Carotid Stents.
    Kumar GP; Kabinejadian F; Liu J; Ho P; Leo HL; Cui F
    Artif Organs; 2017 Mar; 41(3):267-272. PubMed ID: 27357068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. In vitro evaluation of the radial and axial force of self-expanding esophageal stents.
    Hirdes MM; Vleggaar FP; de Beule M; Siersema PD
    Endoscopy; 2013 Dec; 45(12):997-1005. PubMed ID: 24288220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Outcome of carotid artery stenting at 2 years follow-up: comparison of nitinol open cell versus stainless steel closed cell stent design.
    MALEUX G; MARRANNES J; HEYE S; DAENENS K; VERHAMME P; THIJS V
    J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino); 2009 Oct; 50(5):669-75. PubMed ID: 19455089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Carotid artery stenting: which stent for which lesion?
    Bosiers M; Deloose K; Verbist J; Peeters P
    Vascular; 2005; 13(4):205-10. PubMed ID: 16229793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Performance characteristics of self-expanding peripheral nitinol stents].
    Wissgott C; Schmidt W; Behrens P; Schmitz KP; Andresen R
    Rofo; 2009 Jun; 181(6):579-86. PubMed ID: 19353486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Preliminary Clinical Results and Mechanical Behavior of a New Double-Layer Carotid Stent.
    Wissgott C; Schmidt W; Brandt C; Behrens P; Andresen R
    J Endovasc Ther; 2015 Aug; 22(4):634-9. PubMed ID: 26187981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Impact of stent design on the outcome of intervention for carotid bifurcation stenosis.
    Hart JP; Bosiers M; Deloose K; Uflacker R; Schönholz CJ
    J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino); 2010 Dec; 51(6):799-806. PubMed ID: 21124276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. European carotid PROCAR Trial: prospective multicenter trial to evaluate the safety and performance of the ev3 Protégé stent in the treatment of carotid artery stenosis--1- and 6-month follow-up.
    Sugita J; Cremonesi A; Van Elst F; Stockx L; Mathias K; Schofer J; Suttorp MJ; Reul J; Lowens S; Sievert H
    J Interv Cardiol; 2006 Jun; 19(3):215-21. PubMed ID: 16724961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Conformity of carotid stents with vascular anatomy: evaluation in carotid models.
    Tanaka N; Martin JB; Tokunaga K; Abe T; Uchiyama Y; Hayabuchi N; Berkefeld J; Rüfenacht DA
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2004 Apr; 25(4):604-7. PubMed ID: 15090350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fracture of a nitinol carotid artery stent that caused restenosis.
    Surdell D; Shaibani A; Bendok B; Eskandari MK
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2007 Oct; 18(10):1297-9. PubMed ID: 17911521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Carotid artery stent type influences duplex ultrasonography derived peak systolic velocity: findings of an in-vitro model.
    Spies C; Doshi R; Spoon J; Snell RJ
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2007 Aug; 70(2):309-15. PubMed ID: 17630677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prevalence and clinical significance of stent fracture and deformation following carotid artery stenting.
    Chang CK; Huded CP; Nolan BW; Powell RJ
    J Vasc Surg; 2011 Sep; 54(3):685-90. PubMed ID: 21889703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. In-stent recurrent stenosis after carotid artery stenting: life table analysis and clinical relevance.
    Lal BK; Hobson RW; Goldstein J; Geohagan M; Chakhtoura E; Pappas PJ; Jamil Z; Haser PB; Varma S; Padberg FT; Cerveira JJ
    J Vasc Surg; 2003 Dec; 38(6):1162-8; discussion 1169. PubMed ID: 14681601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Role of stent selection in the incidence of persisting hemodynamic depression after carotid artery stenting.
    Csobay-Novák C; Bárány T; Zima E; Nemes B; Sótonyi P; Merkely B; Hüttl K
    J Endovasc Ther; 2015 Feb; 22(1):122-9. PubMed ID: 25775692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical relevance and treatment of carotid stent fractures.
    Sfyroeras GS; Koutsiaris A; Karathanos C; Giannakopoulos A; Giannoukas AD
    J Vasc Surg; 2010 May; 51(5):1280-5. PubMed ID: 20347546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.