These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

51 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21514556)

  • 1. A dose-finding study of oral misoprostol for labor augmentation.
    Villano KS; Lo JY; Alexander JM; McIntire DD; Leveno KJ
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Jun; 204(6):560.e1-5. PubMed ID: 21514556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Rectal versus oral misoprostol for active management of third stage of labor: a randomized controlled trial.
    Mansouri HA; Alsahly N
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2011 May; 283(5):935-9. PubMed ID: 20422423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of oral and vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor at term: a randomized controlled trial.
    Paungmora N; Herabutya Y; O-Prasertsawat P; Punyavachira P
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2004 Oct; 30(5):358-62. PubMed ID: 15327448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison between single dose of 50 microg oral misoprostol and 25 microg vaginal misoprostol for labor induction.
    Paisarntantiwong R; Getgan M
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2005 Oct; 88 Suppl 2():S56-62. PubMed ID: 17722318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Low-dose oral misoprostol for induction of labor: a systematic review.
    Kundodyiwa TW; Alfirevic Z; Weeks AD
    Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Feb; 113(2 Pt 1):374-83. PubMed ID: 19155909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Oral administration of misoprostol for labor induction: a randomized controlled trial.
    Sanchez-Ramos L; Kaunitz AM
    Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Jul; 90(1):153-4. PubMed ID: 9207832
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Misoprostol for term labor induction: a randomized controlled trial.
    Saeed GA; Fakhar S; Nisar N; Alam AY
    Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Mar; 50(1):15-9. PubMed ID: 21482368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Induction of labor with oral misoprostol in nulliparous mothers of twins.
    Simões T; Condeço P; Dias E; Ventura P; Matos C; Blickstein I
    J Perinat Med; 2006; 34(2):111-4. PubMed ID: 16519614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A randomized clinical trial comparing vaginal misoprostol versus cervical Foley plus oral misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Hill JB; Thigpen BD; Bofill JA; Magann E; Moore LE; Martin JN
    Am J Perinatol; 2009 Jan; 26(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 18850516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Oral versus vaginal administration of misoprostol for labor induction.
    Bower DJ; Meurer LN
    J Fam Pract; 1999 Jan; 48(1):9-10. PubMed ID: 9934371
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pilot study of labor induction with titrated oral misoprostol.
    Cheng SY; Chen TC
    Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Sep; 45(3):225-9. PubMed ID: 17175468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Titrated oral compared with vaginal misoprostol for labor induction: a randomized controlled trial.
    Nassar AH; Abdallah R; Usta IM
    Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Jun; 111(6):1444-5; author reply 1445. PubMed ID: 18515531
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Titrated oral compared with vaginal misoprostol for labor induction: a randomized controlled trial.
    Cheng SY; Ming H; Lee JC
    Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Jan; 111(1):119-25. PubMed ID: 18165400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A prospective double blind study using oral versus vaginal misoprostol for labour induction.
    Mehrotra S; Singh U; Gupta HP
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2010; 30(5):461-4. PubMed ID: 20604647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Titrated low-dose vaginal and/or oral misoprostol to induce labour for prelabour membrane rupture: a randomised trial.
    Bricker L; Peden H; Tomlinson AJ; Al-Hussaini TK; Idama T; Candelier C; Luckas M; Furniss H; Davies A; Kumar B; Roberts J; Alfirevic Z
    BJOG; 2008 Nov; 115(12):1503-11. PubMed ID: 18752586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of oral misoprostol tablets and vaginal prostaglandin E2 pessary in induction of labour at term.
    Hassan AA
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2005 May; 15(5):284-7. PubMed ID: 15907239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Safety and efficacy of oral versus vaginal misoprostol use for induction of labour at term.
    Abbassi RM; Sirichand P; Rizvi S
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2008 Oct; 18(10):625-9. PubMed ID: 18940120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of orally administered misoprostol to intravenous oxytocin for labor induction in women with favorable cervical examinations.
    Wing DA; Fassett MJ; Guberman C; Tran S; Parrish A; Guinn D
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jun; 190(6):1689-94; discussion 1694-6. PubMed ID: 15284771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Oral administration of misoprostol for labor induction: a randomized controlled trial.
    Windrim R; Bennett K; Mundle W; Young DC
    Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Mar; 89(3):392-7. PubMed ID: 9052592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sublingual versus oral misoprostol for induction of labour in prelabour rupture of membranes at term.
    Malik HZ; Khawaja NP; Zahid B; Rehman R
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2010 Apr; 20(4):242-5. PubMed ID: 20392399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.