128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21515010)
1. Radiation dose of digital tomosynthesis for sinonasal examination: comparison with multi-detector CT.
Machida H; Yuhara T; Tamura M; Numano T; Abe S; Sabol JM; Suzuki S; Ueno E
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Jun; 81(6):1140-5. PubMed ID: 21515010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Radiation exposure during spiral-CT of the paranasal sinuses].
Dammann F; Momino-Traserra E; Remy C; Pereira PL; Baumann I; Koitschev A; Claussen CD
Rofo; 2000 Mar; 172(3):232-7. PubMed ID: 10778453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Ultra-low dose dual-source high-pitch computed tomography of the paranasal sinus: diagnostic sensitivity and radiation dose.
Schulz B; Potente S; Zangos S; Friedrichs I; Bauer RW; Kerl M; Vogl TJ; Mack MM
Acta Radiol; 2012 May; 53(4):435-40. PubMed ID: 22517983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Digital tomosynthesis in the detection of urolithiasis: Diagnostic performance and dosimetry compared with digital radiography with MDCT as the reference standard.
Mermuys K; De Geeter F; Bacher K; Van De Moortele K; Coenegrachts K; Steyaert L; Casselman JW
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Jul; 195(1):161-7. PubMed ID: 20566811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Radiation dose to the lens of eye and thyroid gland in paranasal sinus multislice CT.
Zammit-Maempel I; Chadwick CL; Willis SP
Br J Radiol; 2003 Jun; 76(906):418-20. PubMed ID: 12814929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Image quality in multidetector CT of paranasal sinuses: potential of dose reduction using an adaptive post-processing filter].
Kröpil P; Cohnen M; Andersen K; Heinen W; Stegmann V; Mödder U
Rofo; 2010 Nov; 182(11):973-8. PubMed ID: 20721848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparing subjective and objective image quality at two different radiation exposure ranges of the paranasal sinus CT examinations using a volumetric 320-row detector CT system.
Pirimoglu B; Sade R; Sakat MS; Ogul H; Eren S; Kantarci M
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2017 Dec; 46(8):20170212. PubMed ID: 28937286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Lens dose in routine head CT: comparison of different optimization methods with anthropomorphic phantoms.
Nikupaavo U; Kaasalainen T; Reijonen V; Ahonen SM; Kortesniemi M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Jan; 204(1):117-23. PubMed ID: 25539246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Radiation doses in examination of lower third molars with computed tomography and conventional radiography.
Ohman A; Kull L; Andersson J; Flygare L
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Dec; 37(8):445-52. PubMed ID: 19033429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reduction of absorbed doses in radiography of the facial skeleton.
Julin P; Kraepelien T
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1984 Nov; 143(5):1113-6. PubMed ID: 6333160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Digital tomosynthesis: a new technique for imaging nephrolithiasis. Specific organ doses and effective doses compared with renal stone protocol noncontrast computed tomography.
Neisius A; Astroza GM; Wang C; Nguyen G; Kuntz NJ; Januzis N; Ferrandino MN; Yoshizumi TT; Preminger GM; Lipkin ME
Urology; 2014 Feb; 83(2):282-7. PubMed ID: 24246323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Saving dose in triple-rule-out computed tomography examination using a high-pitch dual spiral technique.
Sommer WH; Schenzle JC; Becker CR; Nikolaou K; Graser A; Michalski G; Neumaier K; Reiser MF; Johnson TR
Invest Radiol; 2010 Feb; 45(2):64-71. PubMed ID: 20027121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of radiation dose for implant imaging using conventional spiral tomography, computed tomography, and cone-beam computed tomography.
Chau AC; Fung K
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Apr; 107(4):559-65. PubMed ID: 19168378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Low-dose protocol of the spiral CT in orthodontics: comparative evaluation of entrance skin dose with traditional X-ray techniques.
Cordasco G; Portelli M; Militi A; Nucera R; Lo Giudice A; Gatto E; Lucchese A
Prog Orthod; 2013 Sep; 14():24. PubMed ID: 24325970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. CHARACTERISATION OF TLDS-200 AND OSLDS AT LOW X-RAY ENERGIES AND DETERMINATION OF EYE LENS DOSE, THYROID DOSE AND MEAN GLANDULAR DOSE DURING STANDARD MAMMOGRAPHY AND TOMOSYNTHESIS.
Pirchio R; Stefanic A; Rojas RR
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2019 Dec; 186(4):469-478. PubMed ID: 31329992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Very low-dose coronary artery calcium scanning with high-pitch spiral acquisition mode: comparison between 120-kV and 100-kV tube voltage protocols.
Marwan M; Mettin C; Pflederer T; Seltmann M; Schuhbäck A; Muschiol G; Ropers D; Daniel WG; Achenbach S
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2013; 7(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 23333186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessment of scatter radiation dose and absorbed doses in eye lens and thyroid gland during digital breast tomosynthesis.
Chusin T; Matsubara K; Takemura A; Okubo R; Ogawa Y
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Jan; 20(1):340-347. PubMed ID: 30472811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Dosage measurements in spiral CT examinations of the head and neck region].
Cohnen M; Cohnen B; Ewen K; Teubert G; Mödder U
Rofo; 1998 May; 168(5):474-9. PubMed ID: 9617364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reducing the radiation dose for low-dose CT of the paranasal sinuses using iterative reconstruction: feasibility and image quality.
Bulla S; Blanke P; Hassepass F; Krauss T; Winterer JT; Breunig C; Langer M; Pache G
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Sep; 81(9):2246-50. PubMed ID: 21664084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Radiation exposure in perfusion CT of the brain.
Ringelstein A; Lechel U; Fahrendorf DM; Altenbernd JC; Forsting M; Schlamann M
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2014; 38(1):25-8. PubMed ID: 24378887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
