BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

83 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21515617)

  • 1. CT dosimetry computer codes: their influence on radiation dose estimates and the necessity for their revision under new ICRP radiation protection standards.
    Kim KP; Lee J; Bolch WE
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Jul; 146(1-3):252-5. PubMed ID: 21515617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. 2007 recommendations of the ICRP change basis for estimation of the effective dose: what is the impact on radiation dose assessment of patient and personnel?
    Boetticher Hv; Lachmund J; Looe HK; Hoffmann W; Poppe B
    Rofo; 2008 May; 180(5):391-5. PubMed ID: 18438741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The deviation of liver dose in real patients for thoracic computed tomography scans: a new approach to individual dosimetry with methods of radiotherapy treatment planning.
    von Boetticher H; Lüllau T; Lammers M; Kamau EN; Poppe B
    Health Phys; 2011 Jul; 101(1):79-83. PubMed ID: 21617394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Estimating radiation doses from multidetector CT using Monte Carlo simulations: effects of different size voxelized patient models on magnitudes of organ and effective dose.
    DeMarco JJ; Cagnon CH; Cody DD; Stevens DM; McCollough CH; Zankl M; Angel E; McNitt-Gray MF
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 May; 52(9):2583-97. PubMed ID: 17440254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impact on 141Ce, 144Ce, 95Zr, and 90Sr beta emitter dose coefficients of photon and electron SAFs calculated with ICRP/ICRU reference adult voxel computational phantoms.
    Li WB; Zankl M; Schlattl H; Petoussi-Henss N; Eckerman KF; Bolch WE; Oeh U; Hoeschen C
    Health Phys; 2010 Oct; 99(4):503-10. PubMed ID: 20838091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Application of the ICRP/ICRU reference computational phantoms to internal dosimetry: calculation of specific absorbed fractions of energy for photons and electrons.
    Hadid L; Desbrée A; Schlattl H; Franck D; Blanchardon E; Zankl M
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Jul; 55(13):3631-41. PubMed ID: 20526035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of head and body organ doses in CT.
    Huda W; Ogden KM
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Jan; 53(2):N9-N14. PubMed ID: 18184987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of dose metrics and radiation risk models when optimizing CT x-ray tube voltage.
    Huda W; Ogden KM; Khorasani MR
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Sep; 53(17):4719-32. PubMed ID: 18695298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Canine anatomic phantom for preclinical dosimetry in internal emitter therapy.
    Padilla L; Lee C; Milner R; Shahlaee A; Bolch WE
    J Nucl Med; 2008 Mar; 49(3):446-52. PubMed ID: 18287264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A Monte Carlo based method to estimate radiation dose from multidetector CT (MDCT): cylindrical and anthropomorphic phantoms.
    DeMarco JJ; Cagnon CH; Cody DD; Stevens DM; McCollough CH; O'Daniel J; McNitt-Gray MF
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Sep; 50(17):3989-4004. PubMed ID: 16177525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comprehensive dose reconstruction methodology for former rocketdyne/atomics international radiation workers.
    Boice JD; Leggett RW; Ellis ED; Wallace PW; Mumma M; Cohen SS; Brill AB; Chadda B; Boecker BB; Yoder RC; Eckerman KF
    Health Phys; 2006 May; 90(5):409-30. PubMed ID: 16607174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Organ and effective dose evaluation in diagnostic radiology based on in-phantom dose measurements with novel photodiode-dosemeters.
    Kawaura C; Aoyama T; Koyama S; Achiwa M; Mori M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 118(4):421-30. PubMed ID: 16439515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Radiation doses and risks from internal emitters.
    Harrison J; Day P
    J Radiol Prot; 2008 Jun; 28(2):137-59. PubMed ID: 18495991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Determination of the effective dose for CT examinations and influence of the setup parameters].
    Koller F; Roth J
    Rofo; 2007 Jan; 179(1):38-45. PubMed ID: 17203442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of two types of adult phantoms in terms of organ doses from diagnostic CT procedures.
    Liu H; Gu J; Caracappa PF; Xu XG
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Mar; 55(5):1441-51. PubMed ID: 20150686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Development of Monte Carlo simulations to provide scanner-specific organ dose coefficients for contemporary CT.
    Jansen JT; Shrimpton PC
    Phys Med Biol; 2016 Jul; 61(14):5356-77. PubMed ID: 27362736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A review of voxel model development and radiation protection applications at ENEA.
    Gualdrini G; Ferrari P
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010 Aug; 140(4):383-90. PubMed ID: 20385543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effectiveness of protective patient equipment for CT: an anthropomorphic phantom study.
    Ott B; Stüssi A; Mini R
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010 Dec; 142(2-4):213-21. PubMed ID: 20829205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The ICRP protection quantities, equivalent and effective dose: their basis and application.
    Harrison JD; Streffer C
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 127(1-4):12-8. PubMed ID: 18003712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Applicability and limitations of the Adam mathematical phantom with respect to radiological protection.
    Smiljanic I; Schultz FW
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 111(1):89-92. PubMed ID: 15367775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.