272 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21515655)
1. The IRB process needs to be reexamined.
Esaki R; Macario A; Harrison TK; Brock-Utne JG
Anesth Analg; 2011 May; 112(5):1249-50. PubMed ID: 21515655
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Commercial tissue repositories: HIPAA raises sponsors' fears.
Allen MD
IRB; 2004; 26(5):9-11. PubMed ID: 15658012
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. HIPAA and what institutional review boards (IRBs) do not have to review.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2003 Dec; 18(12):1-2. PubMed ID: 15027429
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The use and disclosure of protected health information for research under the HIPAA privacy rule: unrealized patient autonomy and burdensome government regulation.
Tovino SA
S D Law Rev; 2004; 49(3):447-502. PubMed ID: 16493842
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. And you thought the consent document was long enough already.
Teresi ME
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003); 2003; 43(5):552-4. PubMed ID: 14626744
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Institutional review boards and the new privacy rule.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2001 Sep; 16(9):1-3. PubMed ID: 11833565
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. What should IRBs consider when applying the privacy rule to research?
Gerlach JW
Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 2002 Sep; 12(3):299-303. PubMed ID: 12472082
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Analysis of the Nature of IRB Contingencies Required for Informed Consent Document Approval.
Blackwood RA; Maio RF; Mrdjenovich AJ; VandenBosch TM; Gordon PS; Shipman EL; Hamilton TA
Account Res; 2015; 22(4):237-45. PubMed ID: 25897768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Practice brief. Regulations governing research.
Burrington-Brown J; Wagg DG;
J AHIMA; 2003 Mar; 74(3):suppl 56A-56D. PubMed ID: 12914353
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Registry research and medical privacy.
Ingelfinger JR; Drazen JM
N Engl J Med; 2004 Apr; 350(14):1452-3. PubMed ID: 15070797
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The effect of the new federal medical-privacy rule on research.
Kulynych J; Korn D
N Engl J Med; 2002 Jan; 346(3):201-4. PubMed ID: 11796857
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. In other words ... clearing a path ... helping patients understand medical-legal information. Interview by Helen Osborne.
Hochhauser M
Prairie Rose; 2006; 75(2):15-6. PubMed ID: 19264080
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical research 2: legal and ethical issues in research.
Endacott R
Intensive Crit Care Nurs; 2004 Oct; 20(5):313-5. PubMed ID: 15450620
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The Common Rule, Updated.
Menikoff J; Kaneshiro J; Pritchard I
N Engl J Med; 2017 Feb; 376(7):613-615. PubMed ID: 28103146
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Patient privacy. Rule to protect records may doom long-term heart study.
Kaiser J
Science; 2006 Mar; 311(5767):1547-8. PubMed ID: 16543432
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. So what are we going to do about research using clinical information and samples?
Clayton EW
IRB; 2004; 26(6):14-5. PubMed ID: 15658018
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Regulatory and ethical considerations for linking clinical and administrative databases.
Dokholyan RS; Muhlbaier LH; Falletta JM; Jacobs JP; Shahian D; Haan CK; Peterson ED
Am Heart J; 2009 Jun; 157(6):971-82. PubMed ID: 19464406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Institutional review boards and the privacy of human research subjects.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2002 Aug; 17(8):1-2. PubMed ID: 12731492
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Bioethical malpractice: risk and responsibilities in human research.
Noah BA
J Health Care Law Policy; 2004; 7(2):175-241. PubMed ID: 15573441
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. "Exempt" research after the privacy rule.
Barnes M; Gallin KE
IRB; 2003; 25(4):5-6. PubMed ID: 14649247
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
