These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21515892)

  • 1. Modular socket system versus traditionally laminated socket: a cost analysis.
    Normann E; Olsson A; Brodtkorb TH
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2011 Mar; 35(1):76-80. PubMed ID: 21515892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pressure casting technique for transtibial prosthetic socket fit in developing countries.
    Lee PV; Lythgo N; Laing S; Lavranos J; Thanh NH
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2014; 51(1):101-10. PubMed ID: 24805897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of prosthetic costs and service between osseointegrated and conventional suspended transfemoral prostheses.
    Haggstrom EE; Hansson E; Hagberg K
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2013 Apr; 37(2):152-60. PubMed ID: 22907950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cost-effectiveness of bone-anchored prostheses using osseointegrated fixation: Myth or reality?
    Frossard LA; Merlo G; Burkett B; Quincey T; Berg D
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2018 Jun; 42(3):318-327. PubMed ID: 29119860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The modular socket system in a rural setting in Indonesia.
    Giesberts B; Ennion L; Hjelmstrom O; Karma A; Lechler K; Hekman E; Bergsma A
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2018 Jun; 42(3):336-343. PubMed ID: 29153044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A randomized controlled trial comparing functional outcome and cost efficiency of a total surface-bearing socket versus a conventional patellar tendon-bearing socket in transtibial amputees.
    Selles RW; Janssens PJ; Jongenengel CD; Bussmann JB
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2005 Jan; 86(1):154-61; quiz 180. PubMed ID: 15641007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The use of a direct manufacturing prosthetic socket system in a rural community in South Africa: A pilot study and lessons for future research.
    Ennion L; Johannesson A; Rhoda A
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2017 Oct; 41(5):455-462. PubMed ID: 28103760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fluctuating residual limb volume accommodated with an adjustable, modular socket design: A novel case report.
    Mitton K; Kulkarni J; Dunn KW; Ung AH
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2017 Oct; 41(5):527-531. PubMed ID: 27888261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Gait, cost and time implications for changing from PTB to ICEX sockets.
    Datta D; Harris I; Heller B; Howitt J; Martin R
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2004 Aug; 28(2):115-20. PubMed ID: 15382805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Case study: survey of patient satisfaction with prosthesis quality and design among below-knee prosthetic leg socket users.
    Mohd Hawari N; Jawaid M; Md Tahir P; Azmeer RA
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2017 Nov; 12(8):868-874. PubMed ID: 28068847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The development of a rapid prototyping prosthetic socket coated with a resin layer for transtibial amputees.
    Hsu LH; Huang GF; Lu CT; Hong DY; Liu SH
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2010 Mar; 34(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 19947824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of Test Socket on Pain, Prosthesis Satisfaction, and Functionality in Patients with Transfemoral and Transtibial Amputations.
    Aydın A; Çağlar Okur S
    Med Sci Monit; 2018 Jun; 24():4031-4037. PubMed ID: 29897893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cost of prostheses in patients with unilateral transtibial amputation for vascular disease. A population-based follow-up during 8 years of 112 patients.
    Hermodsson Y; Persson BM
    Acta Orthop Scand; 1998 Dec; 69(6):603-7. PubMed ID: 9930106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Lower extremity socket design and suspension.
    Carroll K
    Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am; 2006 Feb; 17(1):31-48. PubMed ID: 16517344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical evaluation of a prosthetic suspension system: Looped silicone liner.
    Abu Osman NA; Gholizadeh H; Eshraghi A; Wan Abas WAB
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2017 Oct; 41(5):476-483. PubMed ID: 28946824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A Prospective Assessment of an Adjustable, Immediate Fit, Transtibial Prosthesis.
    Dillingham T; Kenia J; Shofer F; Marschalek J
    PM R; 2019 Nov; 11(11):1210-1217. PubMed ID: 30734517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cost Analyses of Prosthetic Devices: A Systematic Review.
    Donnelley CA; Shirley C; von Kaeppler EP; Hetherington A; Albright PD; Morshed S; Shearer DW
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2021 Jul; 102(7):1404-1415.e2. PubMed ID: 33711275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Strength evaluation of prosthetic check sockets, copolymer sockets, and definitive laminated sockets.
    Gerschutz MJ; Haynes ML; Nixon D; Colvin JM
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2012; 49(3):405-26. PubMed ID: 22773200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The benefits of using a vacuum-assisted socket system to improve balance and gait in elderly transtibial amputees.
    Samitier CB; Guirao L; Costea M; Camós JM; Pleguezuelos E
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2016 Feb; 40(1):83-8. PubMed ID: 25261489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of an instrument-assisted dynamic prosthetic alignment technique for individuals with transtibial amputation.
    Chen CW; Heim W; Fairley K; Clement RJ; Biddiss E; Torres-Moreno R; Andrysek J
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2016 Aug; 40(4):475-83. PubMed ID: 25762611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.