These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. The face in the crowd effect: anger superiority when using real faces and multiple identities. Pinkham AE; Griffin M; Baron R; Sasson NJ; Gur RC Emotion; 2010 Feb; 10(1):141-6. PubMed ID: 20141311 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The time course of attentional disengagement from angry faces in social anxiety. Moriya J; Tanno Y J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry; 2011 Mar; 42(1):122-8. PubMed ID: 20797697 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Detection of emotional faces: salient physical features guide effective visual search. Calvo MG; Nummenmaa L J Exp Psychol Gen; 2008 Aug; 137(3):471-94. PubMed ID: 18729711 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. No effect of inversion on attentional and affective processing of facial expressions. Lipp OV; Price SM; Tellegen CL Emotion; 2009 Apr; 9(2):248-59. PubMed ID: 19348536 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Temporal processing of emotional stimuli: the capture and release of attention by angry faces. Maratos FA Emotion; 2011 Oct; 11(5):1242-7. PubMed ID: 21942702 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Just another face in the crowd: evidence for decreased detection of angry faces in children with Williams syndrome. Santos A; Silva C; Rosset D; Deruelle C Neuropsychologia; 2010 Mar; 48(4):1071-8. PubMed ID: 20005240 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mandatory processing of irrelevant fearful face features in visual search. Fenker DB; Heipertz D; Boehler CN; Schoenfeld MA; Noesselt T; Heinze HJ; Duezel E; Hopf JM J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Dec; 22(12):2926-38. PubMed ID: 19702468 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Binocular rivalry: a window into emotional processing in aging. Bannerman RL; Regener P; Sahraie A Psychol Aging; 2011 Jun; 26(2):372-80. PubMed ID: 21443353 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Gaze direction differentially affects avoidance tendencies to happy and angry faces in socially anxious individuals. Roelofs K; Putman P; Schouten S; Lange WG; Volman I; Rinck M Behav Res Ther; 2010 Apr; 48(4):290-4. PubMed ID: 19962692 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Attentional bias to angry faces using the dot-probe task? It depends when you look for it. Cooper RM; Langton SR Behav Res Ther; 2006 Sep; 44(9):1321-9. PubMed ID: 16321361 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Attentional capture by emotional faces is contingent on attentional control settings. Barratt D; Bundesen C Cogn Emot; 2012; 26(7):1223-37. PubMed ID: 22416914 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Attentional biases using the body in the crowd task: are angry body postures detected more rapidly? Gilbert T; Martin R; Coulson M Cogn Emot; 2011 Jun; 25(4):700-8. PubMed ID: 21547770 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Deficient inhibition of return for emotional faces in depression. Dai Q; Feng Z Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry; 2009 Aug; 33(6):921-32. PubMed ID: 19394388 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Do happy faces capture attention? The happiness superiority effect in attentional blink. Miyazawa S; Iwasaki S Emotion; 2010 Oct; 10(5):712-6. PubMed ID: 21038954 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The influence of working memory on visual search for emotional facial expressions. Moriya J; Koster EH; De Raedt R J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Oct; 40(5):1874-90. PubMed ID: 24999613 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]