142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21517217)
1. Attentional limits in memory retrieval-revisited.
Green C; Johnston JC; Ruthruff E
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Aug; 37(4):1083-98. PubMed ID: 21517217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. On the locus of dual-task interference: Is there a bottleneck at the stimulus classification stage?
Johnston JC; McCann RS
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Apr; 59(4):694-719. PubMed ID: 16707358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fractionation of the component processes underlying successful episodic encoding: a combined fMRI and divided-attention study.
Uncapher MR; Rugg MD
J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Feb; 20(2):240-54. PubMed ID: 18275332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Viewer perspective affects central bottleneck requirements in spatial translation tasks.
Franz EA; Sebastian A; Hust C; Norris T
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Apr; 34(2):398-412. PubMed ID: 18377178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. When underadditivity of factor effects in the Psychological Refractory Period paradigm implies a bottleneck: evidence from psycholinguistics.
Besner D; Reynolds M; O'Malley S
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Nov; 62(11):2222-34. PubMed ID: 19370482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An information-processing model of three cortical regions: evidence in episodic memory retrieval.
Sohn MH; Goode A; Stenger VA; Jung KJ; Carter CS; Anderson JR
Neuroimage; 2005 Mar; 25(1):21-33. PubMed ID: 15734340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Operation compatibility: a neglected contribution to dual-task costs.
Pannebakker MM; Band GP; Ridderinkhof KR
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Apr; 35(2):447-60. PubMed ID: 19331500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The source of execution-related dual-task interference: motor bottleneck or response monitoring?
Bratzke D; Rolke B; Ulrich R
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Oct; 35(5):1413-26. PubMed ID: 19803646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Top-down and bottom-up attention to memory: a hypothesis (AtoM) on the role of the posterior parietal cortex in memory retrieval.
Ciaramelli E; Grady CL; Moscovitch M
Neuropsychologia; 2008; 46(7):1828-51. PubMed ID: 18471837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Attentional limits in memory retrieval.
Carrier LM; Pashler H
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1995 Sep; 21(5):1339-48. PubMed ID: 8744967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Recognition memory for valenced and arousing materials under conditions of divided attention.
Clark-Foos A; Marsh RL
Memory; 2008; 16(5):530-7. PubMed ID: 18569681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Response activation in overlapping tasks and the response-selection bottleneck.
Schubert T; Fischer R; Stelzel C
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Apr; 34(2):376-97. PubMed ID: 18377177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Parallel memory retrieval in dual-task situations: II. Episodic memory.
Logan GD; Delheimer JA
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 May; 27(3):668-85. PubMed ID: 11394673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Adapting to changing memory retrieval demands: evidence from event-related potentials.
Benoit RG; Werkle-Bergner M; Mecklinger A; Kray J
Brain Cogn; 2009 Jun; 70(1):123-35. PubMed ID: 19254820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mixed-handedness advantages in episodic memory obtained under conditions of intentional learning extend to incidental learning.
Christman SD; Butler M
Brain Cogn; 2011 Oct; 77(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 21807450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Electrophysiological correlates of retrieval processing: effects of consistent versus inconsistent retrieval demands.
Johnson JD; Rugg MD
J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Sep; 18(9):1531-44. PubMed ID: 16989553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Interfering with remembering and knowing: effects of divided attention at retrieval.
Skinner EI; Fernandes MA
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Feb; 127(2):211-21. PubMed ID: 17599796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Parallel response selection in dual-task situations via automatic category-to-response translation.
Thomson SJ; Watter S; Finkelshtein A
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Oct; 72(7):1791-802. PubMed ID: 20952778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Encoding modality can affect memory accuracy via retrieval orientation.
Pierce BH; Gallo DA
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Mar; 37(2):516-21. PubMed ID: 21261425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Laboratory-based and autobiographical retrieval tasks differ substantially in their neural substrates.
McDermott KB; Szpunar KK; Christ SE
Neuropsychologia; 2009 Sep; 47(11):2290-8. PubMed ID: 19159634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
