These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21517217)

  • 41. Impairment of source memory in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder: equivalent current dipole analysis.
    Kim YY; Roh AY; Yoo SY; Kang DH; Kwon JS
    Psychiatry Res; 2009 Jan; 165(1-2):47-59. PubMed ID: 19027963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Prefrontal activity and diagnostic monitoring of memory retrieval: FMRI of the criterial recollection task.
    Gallo DA; Kensinger EA; Schacter DL
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Jan; 18(1):135-48. PubMed ID: 16417689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Parietal cortex and episodic memory retrieval in schizophrenia.
    Lepage M; Pelletier M; Achim A; Montoya A; Menear M; Lal S
    Psychiatry Res; 2010 Jun; 182(3):191-9. PubMed ID: 20488673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. ERP correlates of intentional forgetting.
    Mecklinger A; Parra M; Waldhauser GT
    Brain Res; 2009 Feb; 1255():132-47. PubMed ID: 19103178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Brain regions associated with successful and unsuccessful retrieval of verbal episodic memory as revealed by divided attention.
    Fernandes MA; Moscovitch M; Ziegler M; Grady C
    Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(8):1115-27. PubMed ID: 15817169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Dissociating the "retrieval success" regions of the brain: effects of retrieval delay.
    Huijbers W; Pennartz CM; Daselaar SM
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Jan; 48(2):491-7. PubMed ID: 19835893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Visual similarity at encoding and retrieval in an item recognition task.
    Mate J; Baqués J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Jul; 62(7):1277-84. PubMed ID: 19235099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Models of attention and dual-task performance as explanatory constructs in aphasia.
    Hula WD; McNeil MR
    Semin Speech Lang; 2008 Aug; 29(3):169-87; quiz C 3-4. PubMed ID: 18720315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Selective attention meets spontaneous recognition memory: Evidence for effects at retrieval.
    Moen KC; Miller JK; Lloyd ME
    Conscious Cogn; 2017 Mar; 49():181-189. PubMed ID: 28214768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Evidence for parallel semantic memory retrieval in dual tasks.
    Fischer R; Miller J; Shubert T
    Mem Cognit; 2007 Oct; 35(7):1685-99. PubMed ID: 18062546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Stopping while going! Response inhibition does not suffer dual-task interference.
    Yamaguchi M; Logan GD; Bissett PG
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Feb; 38(1):123-34. PubMed ID: 21574740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. The source of dual-task limitations: serial or parallel processing of multiple response selections?
    Han SW; Marois R
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Oct; 75(7):1395-405. PubMed ID: 23864266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. The role of central attention in retrieval from visual short-term memory.
    Magen H
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Apr; 24(2):423-430. PubMed ID: 27352900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Concurrent task effects on memory retrieval.
    Rohrer D; Pashler HE
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2003 Mar; 10(1):96-103. PubMed ID: 12747495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Effects of divided attention at encoding and retrieval: Further data.
    Craik FIM; Eftekhari E; Binns MA
    Mem Cognit; 2018 Nov; 46(8):1263-1277. PubMed ID: 29934748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. The levels of processing effect under nitrogen narcosis.
    Kneller W; Hobbs M
    Undersea Hyperb Med; 2013; 40(3):239-45. PubMed ID: 23789559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Valence processing bypassing the response selection bottleneck? Evidence from the psychological refractory period paradigm.
    Fischer R; Schubert T
    Exp Psychol; 2008; 55(3):203-11. PubMed ID: 18549168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. The central locus of self-prioritisation.
    Janczyk M; Humphreys GW; Sui J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 May; 72(5):1068-1083. PubMed ID: 29747554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. General cognitive ability and the psychological refractory period: individual differences in the mind's bottleneck.
    Lee JJ; Chabris CF
    Psychol Sci; 2013 Jul; 24(7):1226-33. PubMed ID: 23744874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Electrophysiological examination of response-related interference while dual-tasking: is it motoric or attentional?
    Jung KH; Martin T; Ruthruff E
    Psychol Res; 2021 Mar; 85(2):660-678. PubMed ID: 32020364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.