152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21517219)
1. A behavioral study of distraction by vibrotactile novelty.
Parmentier FB; Ljungberg JK; Elsley JV; Lindkvist M
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Aug; 37(4):1134-9. PubMed ID: 21517219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The cognitive locus of distraction by acoustic novelty in the cross-modal oddball task.
Parmentier FB; Elford G; Escera C; Andrés P; San Miguel I
Cognition; 2008 Jan; 106(1):408-32. PubMed ID: 17445791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Behavioral distraction by auditory novelty is not only about novelty: the role of the distracter's informational value.
Parmentier FB; Elsley JV; Ljungberg JK
Cognition; 2010 Jun; 115(3):504-11. PubMed ID: 20338553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The involuntary capture of attention by sound: novelty and postnovelty distraction in young and older adults.
Parmentier FB; Andrés P
Exp Psychol; 2010; 57(1):68-76. PubMed ID: 20178965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cross-modal distraction by deviance: functional similarities between the auditory and tactile modalities.
Ljungberg JK; Parmentier FB
Exp Psychol; 2012; 59(6):355-63. PubMed ID: 22750743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Why are auditory novels distracting? Contrasting the roles of novelty, violation of expectation and stimulus change.
Parmentier FB; Elsley JV; Andrés P; Barceló F
Cognition; 2011 Jun; 119(3):374-80. PubMed ID: 21382615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessing the influence of schematic drawings of body parts on tactile discrimination performance using the crossmodal congruency task.
Igarashi Y; Kitagawa N; Spence C; Ichihara S
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2007 Feb; 124(2):190-208. PubMed ID: 16759624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Towards a cognitive model of distraction by auditory novelty: the role of involuntary attention capture and semantic processing.
Parmentier FB
Cognition; 2008 Dec; 109(3):345-62. PubMed ID: 19007926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Auditory, tactile, and multisensory cues facilitate search for dynamic visual stimuli.
Ngo MK; Spence C
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Aug; 72(6):1654-65. PubMed ID: 20675808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Now you see it, now you don't: evidence for age-dependent and age-independent cross-modal distraction.
Guerreiro MJ; Van Gerven PW
Psychol Aging; 2011 Jun; 26(2):415-26. PubMed ID: 21443358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The involuntary capture of attention by novel feature pairings: a study of voice-location integration in auditory sensory memory.
Parmentier FB; Maybery MT; Elsley J
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Feb; 72(2):279-84. PubMed ID: 20139445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Lost in the move? Secondary task performance impairs tactile change detection on the body.
Gallace A; Zeeden S; Röder B; Spence C
Conscious Cogn; 2010 Mar; 19(1):215-29. PubMed ID: 19647451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The tactile continuity illusion.
Kitagawa N; Igarashi Y; Kashino M
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Dec; 35(6):1784-90. PubMed ID: 19968435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Nonconcurrently presented auditory tones reduce distraction.
Dittrich K; Stahl C
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Apr; 73(3):714-9. PubMed ID: 21264700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Behavioral and electrophysiological effects of distractor variation on auditory selective attention.
Tong Y; Melara RD
Brain Res; 2007 Aug; 1166():110-23. PubMed ID: 17669371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. When loading working memory reduces distraction: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence from an auditory-visual distraction paradigm.
SanMiguel I; Corral MJ; Escera C
J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Jul; 20(7):1131-45. PubMed ID: 18284343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Two separate mechanisms underlie auditory change detection and involuntary control of attention.
Rinne T; Särkkä A; Degerman A; Schröger E; Alho K
Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1077(1):135-43. PubMed ID: 16487946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Steady-state signatures of visual perceptual load, multimodal distractor filtering, and neural competition.
Parks NA; Hilimire MR; Corballis PM
J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 May; 23(5):1113-24. PubMed ID: 20146614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Disentangling effects of auditory distraction and of stimulus-response sequence.
Roeber U; Berti S; Müller D; Widmann A; Schröger E
Psychophysiology; 2009 Mar; 46(2):425-38. PubMed ID: 19207193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Regularity extraction and application in dynamic auditory stimulus sequences.
Bendixen A; Roeber U; Schröger E
J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 Oct; 19(10):1664-77. PubMed ID: 18271740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
