These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21517219)

  • 21. When seeing doesn't matter: assessing the after-effects of tactile distractor processing in the blind and the sighted.
    Frings C; Amendt A; Spence C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Aug; 37(4):1174-81. PubMed ID: 21553991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Novel vibrotactile discrimination task for investigating the neural correlates of short-term learning with fMRI.
    Tang K; Staines WR; Black SE; McIlroy WE
    J Neurosci Methods; 2009 Mar; 178(1):65-74. PubMed ID: 19109997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. When visual transients impair tactile change detection: a novel case of crossmodal change blindness?
    Gallace A; Auvray M; Tan HZ; Spence C
    Neurosci Lett; 2006 May; 398(3):280-5. PubMed ID: 16480821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The informational constraints of behavioral distraction by unexpected sounds: the role of event information.
    Ljungberg JK; Parmentier FB; Leiva A; Vega N
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Sep; 38(5):1461-8. PubMed ID: 22563629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Spatial coordinate systems for tactile spatial attention depend on developmental vision: evidence from event-related potentials in sighted and congenitally blind adult humans.
    Röder B; Föcker J; Hötting K; Spence C
    Eur J Neurosci; 2008 Aug; 28(3):475-83. PubMed ID: 18702719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Distraction and facilitation--two faces of the same coin?
    Wetzel N; Widmann A; Schröger E
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Jun; 38(3):664-74. PubMed ID: 22022895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. When aging does not increase distraction: Evidence from pure auditory and visual oddball tasks.
    Leiva A; Andrés P; Parmentier FB
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Dec; 41(6):1612-22. PubMed ID: 26214503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Sound affects the speed of visual processing.
    Keetels M; Vroomen J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Jun; 37(3):699-708. PubMed ID: 20854000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The differential effect of vibrotactile and auditory cues on visual spatial attention.
    Ho C; Tan HZ; Spence C
    Ergonomics; 2006 Jun; 49(7):724-38. PubMed ID: 16720531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Feeling for space or for time: task-dependent modulation of the cortical representation of identical vibrotactile stimuli.
    Godde B; Diamond ME; Braun C
    Neurosci Lett; 2010 Aug; 480(2):143-7. PubMed ID: 20561566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. On the control of visual fixation durations in free viewing of complex images.
    Pannasch S; Schulz J; Velichkovsky BM
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 May; 73(4):1120-32. PubMed ID: 21271317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. 'What's in a name?' 'No more than when it's mine own'. Evidence from auditory oddball distraction.
    Ljungberg JK; Parmentier FB; Jones DM; Marsja E; Neely G
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Jul; 150():161-6. PubMed ID: 24880979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity.
    Muller-Gass A; Stelmack RM; Campbell KB
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1078(1):112-30. PubMed ID: 16497283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Tactile and visual distractors induce change blindness for tactile stimuli presented on the fingertips.
    Auvray M; Gallace A; Hartcher-O'Brien J; Tan HZ; Spence C
    Brain Res; 2008 Jun; 1213():111-9. PubMed ID: 18448084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Temporal aspects of the visuotactile congruency effect.
    Shore DI; Barnes ME; Spence C
    Neurosci Lett; 2006 Jan; 392(1-2):96-100. PubMed ID: 16213655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Distraction in a continuous-stimulation detection task.
    Horváth J; Winkler I
    Biol Psychol; 2010 Mar; 83(3):229-38. PubMed ID: 20064580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Implicit processing of tactile information: evidence from the tactile change detection paradigm.
    Pritchett D; Gallace A; Spence C
    Conscious Cogn; 2011 Sep; 20(3):534-46. PubMed ID: 21459622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Congenital blindness leads to enhanced vibrotactile perception.
    Wan CY; Wood AG; Reutens DC; Wilson SJ
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Jan; 48(2):631-5. PubMed ID: 19819246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Age-related differences in distraction and reorientation in an auditory task.
    Horváth J; Czigler I; Birkás E; Winkler I; Gervai J
    Neurobiol Aging; 2009 Jul; 30(7):1157-72. PubMed ID: 18023507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Interactions between exogenous auditory and visual spatial attention.
    Schmitt M; Postma A; De Haan E
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2000 Feb; 53(1):105-30. PubMed ID: 10718066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.