These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21517222)

  • 1. Event-based plausibility immediately influences on-line language comprehension.
    Matsuki K; Chow T; Hare M; Elman JL; Scheepers C; McRae K
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Jul; 37(4):913-34. PubMed ID: 21517222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. In search of on-line locality effects in sentence comprehension.
    Bartek B; Lewis RL; Vasishth S; Smith MR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Sep; 37(5):1178-98. PubMed ID: 21707210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The influence of event-related knowledge on verb-argument processing in aphasia.
    Dickey MW; Warren T
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Jan; 67():63-81. PubMed ID: 25484306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of world knowledge on the prediction of upcoming verbs: an eye-tracking study.
    Vela-Candelas J; Català N; Demestre J
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2022 Dec; 51(6):1335-1345. PubMed ID: 35790654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Phonological typicality does not influence fixation durations in normal reading.
    Staub A; Grant M; Clifton C; Rayner K
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 May; 35(3):806-14. PubMed ID: 19379050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The thematic hierarchy in sentence comprehension: A study on the interaction between verb class and word order in Spanish.
    Gattei CA; Dickey MW; Wainselboim AJ; París L
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(10):1981-2007. PubMed ID: 25529525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of context on eye movements when reading about possible and impossible events.
    Warren T; McConnell K; Rayner K
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Jul; 34(4):1001-10. PubMed ID: 18605885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Interplay between syntax and semantics during sentence comprehension: ERP effects of combining syntactic and semantic violations.
    Hagoort P
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Aug; 15(6):883-99. PubMed ID: 14511541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Lexical predictability exerts robust effects on fixation duration, but not on initial landing position during reading.
    Vainio S; Hyönä J; Pajunen A
    Exp Psychol; 2009; 56(1):66-74. PubMed ID: 19261580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Phonological typicality and sentence processing.
    Tanenhaus MK; Hare M
    Trends Cogn Sci; 2007 Mar; 11(3):93-5. PubMed ID: 17207653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Anticipating syntax during reading: Evidence from the boundary change paradigm.
    Brothers T; Traxler MJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Dec; 42(12):1894-1906. PubMed ID: 27123753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Misinterpretations in agreement and agreement attraction.
    Patson ND; Husband EM
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(5):950-71. PubMed ID: 25624171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Distinguishing the time course of lexical and discourse processes through context, coreference, and quantified expressions.
    Huang YT; Gordon PC
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Jul; 37(4):966-78. PubMed ID: 21480750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Eye movements when reading implausible sentences: investigating potential structural influences on semantic integration.
    Patson ND; Warren T
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Aug; 63(8):1516-32. PubMed ID: 19941198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The time-course of lexical and structural processes in sentence comprehension.
    Tily H; Fedorenko E; Gibson E
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 May; 63(5):910-27. PubMed ID: 19746299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The role of executive control in resolving grammatical number conflict in sentence comprehension.
    Vandierendonck A; Loncke M; Hartsuiker RJ; Desmet T
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Mar; 71(3):759-778. PubMed ID: 28056625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. World knowledge affects prediction as quickly as selectional restrictions: Evidence from the visual world paradigm.
    Milburn E; Warren T; Dickey MW
    Lang Cogn Neurosci; 2016; 31(4):536-548. PubMed ID: 27148555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Event processing in the visual world: Projected motion paths during spoken sentence comprehension.
    Kamide Y; Lindsay S; Scheepers C; Kukona A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 May; 42(5):804-12. PubMed ID: 26478958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Semantic integration processes at different levels of syntactic hierarchy during sentence comprehension: an ERP study.
    Zhou X; Jiang X; Ye Z; Zhang Y; Lou K; Zhan W
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 May; 48(6):1551-62. PubMed ID: 20138898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Syntactic priming during sentence comprehension: evidence for the lexical boost.
    Traxler MJ; Tooley KM; Pickering MJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Jul; 40(4):905-18. PubMed ID: 24707789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.