These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
69 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2151835)
1. Lessons learned from large-scale clinical trials. Deykin D Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc; 1991; 102():96-104; discussion 104-5. PubMed ID: 2151835 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Bias in meta-analysis and funnel plot asymmetry. Biljana M; Jelena M; Branislav J; Milorad R Stud Health Technol Inform; 1999; 68():323-8. PubMed ID: 10724898 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Meta-analysis combining parallel and cross-over clinical trials. III: The issue of carry-over. Curtin F; Elbourne D; Altman DG Stat Med; 2002 Aug; 21(15):2161-73. PubMed ID: 12210631 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Critical reading of the meta-analysis of clinical trials. Nony P; Cucherat M; Haugh MC; Boissel JP Therapie; 1995; 50(4):339-51. PubMed ID: 7482388 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Five easy pieces on evidence-based medicine (4). Kalso E; Edwards J; McQuay HJ; Moore RA Eur J Pain; 2002; 6(1):89-93. PubMed ID: 11888232 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Changes in clinical trials mandated by the advent of meta-analysis. Chalmers TC; Lau J Stat Med; 1996 Jun; 15(12):1263-8; discussion 1269-72. PubMed ID: 8817800 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quo vadis meta-analysis? A potentially dangerous tool if used without adequate rules. Michels KB Important Adv Oncol; 1992; ():243-8. PubMed ID: 1582676 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Publication bias was not a good reason to discourage trials with low power. Borm GF; den Heijer M; Zielhuis GA J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Jan; 62(1):47.e1-10. PubMed ID: 18620841 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Clinical trials: find the bias!]. Bouvenot G; Vray M Rev Rhum Ed Fr; 1993 Jun; 60(6):412-5. PubMed ID: 8124273 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Bayesian random effects meta-analysis of trials with binary outcomes: methods for the absolute risk difference and relative risk scales. Warn DE; Thompson SG; Spiegelhalter DJ Stat Med; 2002 Jun; 21(11):1601-23. PubMed ID: 12111922 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Collective equipoise, disappointment, and the therapeutic misconception: on the consequences of selection for clinical research. Byrne MM; Thompson P Med Decis Making; 2006; 26(5):467-79. PubMed ID: 16997925 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An exploratory test for an excess of significant findings. Ioannidis JP; Trikalinos TA Clin Trials; 2007; 4(3):245-53. PubMed ID: 17715249 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Lessons from TGN1412 and TARGET: implications for observational studies and meta-analysis. Senn S Pharm Stat; 2008; 7(4):294-301. PubMed ID: 18381774 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Trials and tribulations: obstacles to clinical trial recruitment. Reed N; Siddiqui N Br J Cancer; 2003 Sep; 89(6):957-8. PubMed ID: 12966407 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]