BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

360 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21518674)

  • 1. First-in-man evaluation of intravascular optical frequency domain imaging (OFDI) of Terumo: a comparison with intravascular ultrasound and quantitative coronary angiography.
    Okamura T; Onuma Y; Garcia-Garcia HM; van Geuns RJ; Wykrzykowska JJ; Schultz C; van der Giessen WJ; Ligthart J; Regar E; Serruys PW
    EuroIntervention; 2011 Apr; 6(9):1037-45. PubMed ID: 21518674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Optical Frequency Domain Imaging Versus Intravascular Ultrasound in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (OPINION Trial): Results From the OPINION Imaging Study.
    Otake H; Kubo T; Takahashi H; Shinke T; Okamura T; Hibi K; Nakazawa G; Morino Y; Shite J; Fusazaki T; Kozuma K; Ioji T; Kaneda H; Akasaka T;
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 Jan; 11(1):111-123. PubMed ID: 28917678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Frequency-domain optical coherence tomography assessment of unprotected left main coronary artery disease-a comparison with intravascular ultrasound.
    Fujino Y; Bezerra HG; Attizzani GF; Wang W; Yamamoto H; Chamié D; Kanaya T; Mehanna E; Tahara S; Nakamura S; Costa MA
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Sep; 82(3):E173-83. PubMed ID: 23359350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Interstudy reproducibility of the second generation, Fourier domain optical coherence tomography in patients with coronary artery disease and comparison with intravascular ultrasound: a study applying automated contour detection.
    Jamil Z; Tearney G; Bruining N; Sihan K; van Soest G; Ligthart J; van Domburg R; Bouma B; Regar E
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Jan; 29(1):39-51. PubMed ID: 22639296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Discrepancy between frequency domain optical coherence tomography and intravascular ultrasound in human coronary arteries and in a phantom in vitro coronary model.
    Kim IC; Nam CW; Cho YK; Park HS; Yoon HJ; Kim H; Chung IS; Han S; Hur SH; Kim YN; Kim KB
    Int J Cardiol; 2016 Oct; 221():860-6. PubMed ID: 27434362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quantitative precision of optical frequency domain imaging: direct comparison with frequency domain optical coherence tomography and intravascular ultrasound.
    Kobayashi Y; Kitahara H; Tanaka S; Okada K; Kimura T; Ikeno F; Yock PG; Fitzgerald PJ; Honda Y
    Cardiovasc Interv Ther; 2016 Apr; 31(2):79-88. PubMed ID: 26271203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ex vivo assessment of vascular response to coronary stents by optical frequency domain imaging.
    Nakano M; Vorpahl M; Otsuka F; Taniwaki M; Yazdani SK; Finn AV; Ladich ER; Kolodgie FD; Virmani R
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Jan; 5(1):71-82. PubMed ID: 22239896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. OCT compared with IVUS in a coronary lesion assessment: the OPUS-CLASS study.
    Kubo T; Akasaka T; Shite J; Suzuki T; Uemura S; Yu B; Kozuma K; Kitabata H; Shinke T; Habara M; Saito Y; Hou J; Suzuki N; Zhang S
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Oct; 6(10):1095-1104. PubMed ID: 24011777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Segmental comparison between a dedicated bifurcation stent and balloon angioplasty using intravascular ultrasound and three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography: A subgroup analysis of the Tryton IDE randomized trial.
    Grundeken MJ; Garcia-Garcia HM; Kumsars I; Lesiak M; Kayaert P; Dens J; Stella PR; de Winter RJ; Laak LL; Généreux P; Kaplan AV; Leon MB; Wykrzykowska JJ; Onuma Y; Serruys PW
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Feb; 89(2):E53-E63. PubMed ID: 27083384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. High-speed intracoronary optical frequency domain imaging: implications for three-dimensional reconstruction and quantitative analysis.
    Okamura T; Onuma Y; Garcia-Garcia HM; Bruining N; Serruys PW
    EuroIntervention; 2012 Feb; 7(10):1216-26. PubMed ID: 22334321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fusion of 3D QCA and IVUS/OCT.
    Tu S; Holm NR; Koning G; Huang Z; Reiber JH
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2011 Feb; 27(2):197-207. PubMed ID: 21264684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Additive Value of Integrated Backscatter IVUS for Detection of Vulnerable Plaque by Optical Frequency Domain Imaging: An Ex Vivo Autopsy Study of Human Coronary Arteries.
    Nakano M; Yahagi K; Yamamoto H; Taniwaki M; Otsuka F; Ladich ER; Joner M; Virmani R
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Feb; 9(2):163-72. PubMed ID: 26777223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Three-dimensional coronary artery microscopy by intracoronary optical frequency domain imaging.
    Tearney GJ; Waxman S; Shishkov M; Vakoc BJ; Suter MJ; Freilich MI; Desjardins AE; Oh WY; Bartlett LA; Rosenberg M; Bouma BE
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2008 Nov; 1(6):752-61. PubMed ID: 19356512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of coronary arterial calcification - Ex-vivo assessment by optical frequency domain imaging.
    Ijichi T; Nakazawa G; Torii S; Nakano M; Yoshikawa A; Morino Y; Ikari Y
    Atherosclerosis; 2015 Nov; 243(1):242-7. PubMed ID: 26408928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Incidence, predictors, morphological characteristics, and clinical outcomes of stent edge dissections detected by optical coherence tomography.
    Chamié D; Bezerra HG; Attizzani GF; Yamamoto H; Kanaya T; Stefano GT; Fujino Y; Mehanna E; Wang W; Abdul-Aziz A; Dias M; Simon DI; Costa MA
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Aug; 6(8):800-13. PubMed ID: 23871510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A novel three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography system: In-vivo comparison with intravascular ultrasound for assessing arterial segment length.
    Tu S; Huang Z; Koning G; Cui K; Reiber JH
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2010 Aug; 76(2):291-8. PubMed ID: 20665880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of intravascular optical frequency domain imaging versus intravascular ultrasound during balloon pulmonary angioplasty in patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension.
    Ikeda N; Kubota S; Okazaki T; Hara H; Hiroi Y
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Jun; 87(7):E268-74. PubMed ID: 26991798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Early- and long-term intravascular ultrasound and angiographic findings after bioabsorbable magnesium stent implantation in human coronary arteries.
    Waksman R; Erbel R; Di Mario C; Bartunek J; de Bruyne B; Eberli FR; Erne P; Haude M; Horrigan M; Ilsley C; Böse D; Bonnier H; Koolen J; Lüscher TF; Weissman NJ;
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2009 Apr; 2(4):312-20. PubMed ID: 19463443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. In vivo validation of CAAS QCA-3D coronary reconstruction using fusion of angiography and intravascular ultrasound (ANGUS).
    Schuurbiers JC; Lopez NG; Ligthart J; Gijsen FJ; Dijkstra J; Serruys PW; Van der Steen AF; Wentzel JJ
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2009 Apr; 73(5):620-6. PubMed ID: 19309696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Optical frequency domain imaging vs. intravascular ultrasound in percutaneous coronary intervention (OPINION trial): one-year angiographic and clinical results.
    Kubo T; Shinke T; Okamura T; Hibi K; Nakazawa G; Morino Y; Shite J; Fusazaki T; Otake H; Kozuma K; Ioji T; Kaneda H; Serikawa T; Kataoka T; Okada H; Akasaka T;
    Eur Heart J; 2017 Nov; 38(42):3139-3147. PubMed ID: 29121226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.