These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

358 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21518674)

  • 1. First-in-man evaluation of intravascular optical frequency domain imaging (OFDI) of Terumo: a comparison with intravascular ultrasound and quantitative coronary angiography.
    Okamura T; Onuma Y; Garcia-Garcia HM; van Geuns RJ; Wykrzykowska JJ; Schultz C; van der Giessen WJ; Ligthart J; Regar E; Serruys PW
    EuroIntervention; 2011 Apr; 6(9):1037-45. PubMed ID: 21518674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Optical Frequency Domain Imaging Versus Intravascular Ultrasound in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (OPINION Trial): Results From the OPINION Imaging Study.
    Otake H; Kubo T; Takahashi H; Shinke T; Okamura T; Hibi K; Nakazawa G; Morino Y; Shite J; Fusazaki T; Kozuma K; Ioji T; Kaneda H; Akasaka T;
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 Jan; 11(1):111-123. PubMed ID: 28917678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Frequency-domain optical coherence tomography assessment of unprotected left main coronary artery disease-a comparison with intravascular ultrasound.
    Fujino Y; Bezerra HG; Attizzani GF; Wang W; Yamamoto H; Chamié D; Kanaya T; Mehanna E; Tahara S; Nakamura S; Costa MA
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Sep; 82(3):E173-83. PubMed ID: 23359350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Interstudy reproducibility of the second generation, Fourier domain optical coherence tomography in patients with coronary artery disease and comparison with intravascular ultrasound: a study applying automated contour detection.
    Jamil Z; Tearney G; Bruining N; Sihan K; van Soest G; Ligthart J; van Domburg R; Bouma B; Regar E
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Jan; 29(1):39-51. PubMed ID: 22639296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Discrepancy between frequency domain optical coherence tomography and intravascular ultrasound in human coronary arteries and in a phantom in vitro coronary model.
    Kim IC; Nam CW; Cho YK; Park HS; Yoon HJ; Kim H; Chung IS; Han S; Hur SH; Kim YN; Kim KB
    Int J Cardiol; 2016 Oct; 221():860-6. PubMed ID: 27434362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quantitative precision of optical frequency domain imaging: direct comparison with frequency domain optical coherence tomography and intravascular ultrasound.
    Kobayashi Y; Kitahara H; Tanaka S; Okada K; Kimura T; Ikeno F; Yock PG; Fitzgerald PJ; Honda Y
    Cardiovasc Interv Ther; 2016 Apr; 31(2):79-88. PubMed ID: 26271203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ex vivo assessment of vascular response to coronary stents by optical frequency domain imaging.
    Nakano M; Vorpahl M; Otsuka F; Taniwaki M; Yazdani SK; Finn AV; Ladich ER; Kolodgie FD; Virmani R
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Jan; 5(1):71-82. PubMed ID: 22239896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. OCT compared with IVUS in a coronary lesion assessment: the OPUS-CLASS study.
    Kubo T; Akasaka T; Shite J; Suzuki T; Uemura S; Yu B; Kozuma K; Kitabata H; Shinke T; Habara M; Saito Y; Hou J; Suzuki N; Zhang S
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Oct; 6(10):1095-1104. PubMed ID: 24011777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Segmental comparison between a dedicated bifurcation stent and balloon angioplasty using intravascular ultrasound and three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography: A subgroup analysis of the Tryton IDE randomized trial.
    Grundeken MJ; Garcia-Garcia HM; Kumsars I; Lesiak M; Kayaert P; Dens J; Stella PR; de Winter RJ; Laak LL; Généreux P; Kaplan AV; Leon MB; Wykrzykowska JJ; Onuma Y; Serruys PW
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Feb; 89(2):E53-E63. PubMed ID: 27083384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. High-speed intracoronary optical frequency domain imaging: implications for three-dimensional reconstruction and quantitative analysis.
    Okamura T; Onuma Y; Garcia-Garcia HM; Bruining N; Serruys PW
    EuroIntervention; 2012 Feb; 7(10):1216-26. PubMed ID: 22334321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fusion of 3D QCA and IVUS/OCT.
    Tu S; Holm NR; Koning G; Huang Z; Reiber JH
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2011 Feb; 27(2):197-207. PubMed ID: 21264684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Additive Value of Integrated Backscatter IVUS for Detection of Vulnerable Plaque by Optical Frequency Domain Imaging: An Ex Vivo Autopsy Study of Human Coronary Arteries.
    Nakano M; Yahagi K; Yamamoto H; Taniwaki M; Otsuka F; Ladich ER; Joner M; Virmani R
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Feb; 9(2):163-72. PubMed ID: 26777223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Three-dimensional coronary artery microscopy by intracoronary optical frequency domain imaging.
    Tearney GJ; Waxman S; Shishkov M; Vakoc BJ; Suter MJ; Freilich MI; Desjardins AE; Oh WY; Bartlett LA; Rosenberg M; Bouma BE
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2008 Nov; 1(6):752-61. PubMed ID: 19356512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of coronary arterial calcification - Ex-vivo assessment by optical frequency domain imaging.
    Ijichi T; Nakazawa G; Torii S; Nakano M; Yoshikawa A; Morino Y; Ikari Y
    Atherosclerosis; 2015 Nov; 243(1):242-7. PubMed ID: 26408928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Incidence, predictors, morphological characteristics, and clinical outcomes of stent edge dissections detected by optical coherence tomography.
    Chamié D; Bezerra HG; Attizzani GF; Yamamoto H; Kanaya T; Stefano GT; Fujino Y; Mehanna E; Wang W; Abdul-Aziz A; Dias M; Simon DI; Costa MA
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Aug; 6(8):800-13. PubMed ID: 23871510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A novel three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography system: In-vivo comparison with intravascular ultrasound for assessing arterial segment length.
    Tu S; Huang Z; Koning G; Cui K; Reiber JH
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2010 Aug; 76(2):291-8. PubMed ID: 20665880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of intravascular optical frequency domain imaging versus intravascular ultrasound during balloon pulmonary angioplasty in patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension.
    Ikeda N; Kubota S; Okazaki T; Hara H; Hiroi Y
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Jun; 87(7):E268-74. PubMed ID: 26991798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Early- and long-term intravascular ultrasound and angiographic findings after bioabsorbable magnesium stent implantation in human coronary arteries.
    Waksman R; Erbel R; Di Mario C; Bartunek J; de Bruyne B; Eberli FR; Erne P; Haude M; Horrigan M; Ilsley C; Böse D; Bonnier H; Koolen J; Lüscher TF; Weissman NJ;
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2009 Apr; 2(4):312-20. PubMed ID: 19463443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. In vivo validation of CAAS QCA-3D coronary reconstruction using fusion of angiography and intravascular ultrasound (ANGUS).
    Schuurbiers JC; Lopez NG; Ligthart J; Gijsen FJ; Dijkstra J; Serruys PW; Van der Steen AF; Wentzel JJ
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2009 Apr; 73(5):620-6. PubMed ID: 19309696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Optical frequency domain imaging vs. intravascular ultrasound in percutaneous coronary intervention (OPINION trial): one-year angiographic and clinical results.
    Kubo T; Shinke T; Okamura T; Hibi K; Nakazawa G; Morino Y; Shite J; Fusazaki T; Otake H; Kozuma K; Ioji T; Kaneda H; Serikawa T; Kataoka T; Okada H; Akasaka T;
    Eur Heart J; 2017 Nov; 38(42):3139-3147. PubMed ID: 29121226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.