122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21519117)
1. Improving a consensus approach for protein structure selection by removing redundancy.
Wang Q; Shang Y; Xu D
IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2011; 8(6):1708-15. PubMed ID: 21519117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. NEW MDS AND CLUSTERING BASED ALGORITHMS FOR PROTEIN MODEL QUALITY ASSESSMENT AND SELECTION.
Wang Q; Shang C; Xu D; Shang Y
Int J Artif Intell Tools; 2013 Oct; 22(5):1360006. PubMed ID: 24808625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. SELECTpro: effective protein model selection using a structure-based energy function resistant to BLUNDERs.
Randall A; Baldi P
BMC Struct Biol; 2008 Dec; 8():52. PubMed ID: 19055744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. QMEANclust: estimation of protein model quality by combining a composite scoring function with structural density information.
Benkert P; Schwede T; Tosatto SC
BMC Struct Biol; 2009 May; 9():35. PubMed ID: 19457232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. MUFOLD-WQA: A new selective consensus method for quality assessment in protein structure prediction.
Wang Q; Vantasin K; Xu D; Shang Y
Proteins; 2011; 79 Suppl 10(Suppl 10):185-95. PubMed ID: 21997748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Improving predicted protein loop structure ranking using a Pareto-optimality consensus method.
Li Y; Rata I; Chiu SW; Jakobsson E
BMC Struct Biol; 2010 Jul; 10():22. PubMed ID: 20642859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Protein structural model selection by combining consensus and single scoring methods.
He Z; Alazmi M; Zhang J; Xu D
PLoS One; 2013; 8(9):e74006. PubMed ID: 24023923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A multilayer evaluation approach for protein structure prediction and model quality assessment.
Zhang J; Wang Q; Vantasin K; Zhang J; He Z; Kosztin I; Shang Y; Xu D
Proteins; 2011; 79 Suppl 10(Suppl 10):172-84. PubMed ID: 21997706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Improved model quality assessment using ProQ2.
Ray A; Lindahl E; Wallner B
BMC Bioinformatics; 2012 Sep; 13():224. PubMed ID: 22963006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. United3D: a protein model quality assessment program that uses two consensus based methods.
Terashi G; Oosawa M; Nakamura Y; Kanou K; Takeda-Shitaka M
Chem Pharm Bull (Tokyo); 2012; 60(11):1359-65. PubMed ID: 23124558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prediction of global and local quality of CASP8 models by MULTICOM series.
Cheng J; Wang Z; Tegge AN; Eickholt J
Proteins; 2009; 77 Suppl 9():181-4. PubMed ID: 19544564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The other 90% of the protein: assessment beyond the Calphas for CASP8 template-based and high-accuracy models.
Keedy DA; Williams CJ; Headd JJ; Arendall WB; Chen VB; Kapral GJ; Gillespie RA; Block JN; Zemla A; Richardson DC; Richardson JS
Proteins; 2009; 77 Suppl 9(Suppl 9):29-49. PubMed ID: 19731372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Introducing a Clustering Step in a Consensus Approach for the Scoring of Protein-Protein Docking Models.
Chermak E; De Donato R; Lensink MF; Petta A; Serra L; Scarano V; Cavallo L; Oliva R
PLoS One; 2016; 11(11):e0166460. PubMed ID: 27846259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Global and local model quality estimation at CASP8 using the scoring functions QMEAN and QMEANclust.
Benkert P; Tosatto SC; Schwede T
Proteins; 2009; 77 Suppl 9():173-80. PubMed ID: 19705484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. On-line hierarchy of general linear models for selecting and ranking the best predicted protein structures.
Girgis HZ; Corso JJ; Fischer D
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2009; 2009():4949-53. PubMed ID: 19963875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Refined template selection and combination algorithm significantly improves template-based modeling accuracy.
Runthala A; Chowdhury S
J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2019 Apr; 17(2):1950006. PubMed ID: 31057073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Finding nearly optimal GDT scores.
Li SC; Bu D; Xu J; Li M
J Comput Biol; 2011 May; 18(5):693-704. PubMed ID: 21554017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The CASP13-CAPRI targets as case studies to illustrate a novel scoring pipeline integrating CONSRANK with clustering and interface analyses.
Barradas-Bautista D; Cao Z; Cavallo L; Oliva R
BMC Bioinformatics; 2020 Sep; 21(Suppl 8):262. PubMed ID: 32938371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A library of protein surface patches discriminates between native structures and decoys generated by structure prediction servers.
Gamliel R; Kedem K; Kolodny R; Keasar C
BMC Struct Biol; 2011 May; 11(1):20. PubMed ID: 21542935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A sampling-based method for ranking protein structural models by integrating multiple scores and features.
Shi X; Zhang J; He Z; Shang Y; Xu D
Curr Protein Pept Sci; 2011 Sep; 12(6):540-8. PubMed ID: 21787308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
