These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21519281)

  • 21. Day-to-day discrepancy in Bravo pH monitoring is related to the degree of deterioration of the lower esophageal sphincter and severity of reflux disease.
    Ayazi S; Hagen JA; Zehetner J; Banki F; Augustin F; Ayazi A; DeMeester SR; Oh DS; Sohn HJ; Lipham JC; DeMeester TR
    Surg Endosc; 2011 Jul; 25(7):2219-23. PubMed ID: 21359906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Two years' experience of using the Bravo wireless oesophageal pH monitoring system at a single UK tertiary centre.
    Rao NM; Campbell DI; Rao P
    Acta Paediatr; 2017 Feb; 106(2):312-315. PubMed ID: 27862298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Bravo catheter-free pH monitoring: normal values, concordance, optimal diagnostic thresholds, and accuracy.
    Ayazi S; Lipham JC; Portale G; Peyre CG; Streets CG; Leers JM; Demeester SR; Banki F; Chan LS; Hagen JA; Demeester TR
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2009 Jan; 7(1):60-7. PubMed ID: 18976965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Use and utility of the Bravo pH capsule.
    Pandolfino JE; Kwiatek MA
    J Clin Gastroenterol; 2008; 42(5):571-8. PubMed ID: 18364590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Bravo capsule placement in the gastric cardia: a novel method for analysis of proximal stomach acid environment.
    Pandolfino JE; Schreiner MA; Lee TJ; Zhang Q; Kahrilas PJ
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2005 Aug; 100(8):1721-7. PubMed ID: 16086707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Impact of measurement of esophageal acid exposure close to the gastroesophageal junction on diagnostic accuracy and event-symptom correlation: a prospective study using wireless dual pH monitoring.
    Bansal A; Wani S; Rastogi A; Rastogi K; Goyal A; Hall S; Singh V; Higbee A; Sharma P
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2009 Dec; 104(12):2918-25. PubMed ID: 19755975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The Bravo pH capsule system.
    Kwiatek MA; Pandolfino JE
    Dig Liver Dis; 2008 Mar; 40(3):156-60. PubMed ID: 18096447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Wireless pH testing as an adjunct to unsedated transnasal esophagoscopy: the safety and efficacy of transnasal telemetry capsule placement.
    Belafsky PC; Allen K; Castro-Del Rosario L; Roseman D
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2004 Jul; 131(1):26-8. PubMed ID: 15243553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Interference with daily activities and major adverse events during esophageal pH monitoring with bravo wireless capsule versus conventional intranasal catheter: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.
    Iluyomade A; Olowoyeye A; Fadahunsi O; Thomas L; Libend CN; Ragunathan K; Fenster J; Vignesh S
    Dis Esophagus; 2017 Feb; 30(3):1-9. PubMed ID: 26952638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Cold and hot snare endoscopic techniques for removal of the Bravo pH monitoring capsule.
    de Hoyos A; Esparza EA; Loredo ML
    Digestion; 2009; 79(1):14-6. PubMed ID: 19169030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Outpatient monitoring of oesophageal pH with a catheter-free pH-meter (Bravo System). A Study of tolerance, safety and efficacy].
    MartĂ­nez de Haro LF; Munitiz V; Ortiz A; Ruiz de Angulo D; Navarro MD; Parrilla P
    Cir Esp; 2008 Oct; 84(4):201-9. PubMed ID: 18928770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Wireless pH capsule--yield in clinical practice.
    Roman S; Mion F; Zerbib F; Benamouzig R; Letard JC; Bruley des Varannes S
    Endoscopy; 2012 Mar; 44(3):270-6. PubMed ID: 22275050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Continuous 48-Hour Wireless Esophageal pH Monitoring in Children: Comparison Between Days 1 and 2.
    Ravi A; Gunasekaran T; Berman J
    J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr; 2016 Jan; 62(1):87-9. PubMed ID: 26196198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Review article: oesophageal pH monitoring--technologies, interpretation and correlation with clinical outcomes.
    Kahrilas PJ; Pandolfino JE
    Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2005 Dec; 22 Suppl 3():2-9. PubMed ID: 16303031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Impact of prolonged 48-h wireless capsule esophageal pH monitoring on diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease and evaluation of the relationship between symptoms and reflux episodes.
    Domingues GR; Moraes-Filho JP; Domingues AG
    Arq Gastroenterol; 2011; 48(1):24-9. PubMed ID: 21537538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Placement of the Bravo wireless pH monitoring capsule onto the gastric wall under endoscopic guidance.
    Yamaguchi T; Seza A; Odaka T; Shishido T; Ai M; Gen S; Kouzu T; Saisho H
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2006 Jun; 63(7):1046-50. PubMed ID: 16733123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Subcardial 24-h wireless pH monitoring in gastroesophageal reflux disease patients with and without hiatal hernia compared with healthy subjects.
    Grigolon A; CantĂș P; Bravi I; Caparello C; Penagini R
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2009 Nov; 104(11):2714-20. PubMed ID: 19638965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Technical problems produced by the Bravo pH test in nonerosive reflux disease patients.
    de Hoyos A; Esparza EA
    World J Gastroenterol; 2010 Jul; 16(25):3183-6. PubMed ID: 20593504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. 48-Hour pH monitoring increases the risk of false positive studies when the capsule is prematurely passed.
    Iqbal A; Lee YK; Vitamvas M; Oleynikov D
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2007 May; 11(5):638-41. PubMed ID: 17468923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Patients with functional heartburn are more likely to report retrosternal discomfort during wireless pH monitoring.
    Lee YC; Wang HP; Chiu HM; Huang SP; Tu CH; Wu MS; Lin JT
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2005 Dec; 62(6):834-41. PubMed ID: 16301022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.