These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21519571)

  • 1. Development of a self-adjusting magnetic attachment for implant overdentures.
    Maeda Y; Yang TC; Kinoshita Y
    Int J Prosthodont; 2011; 24(3):241-3. PubMed ID: 21519571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Attachment systems for implant overdenture: influence of implant inclination on retentive and lateral forces.
    Yang TC; Maeda Y; Gonda T; Kotecha S
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Nov; 22(11):1315-9. PubMed ID: 21426402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of retention and strain energies of stud attachments for implant overdentures.
    Petropoulos VC; Mante FK
    J Prosthodont; 2011 Jun; 20(4):286-93. PubMed ID: 21539646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Attachment systems for mandibular single-implant overdentures: an in vitro retention force investigation on different designs.
    Alsabeeha N; Atieh M; Swain MV; Payne AG
    Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(2):160-6. PubMed ID: 20305857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Biomechanical rationale for a single implant-retained mandibular overdenture: an in vitro study.
    Maeda Y; Horisaka M; Yagi K
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Mar; 19(3):271-5. PubMed ID: 18081872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Maximum dislodging forces of implant overdenture stud attachments.
    Petropoulos VC; Smith W
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(4):526-35. PubMed ID: 12182295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of magnetic attachment with stress breaker on lateral stress to abutment tooth under overdenture.
    Gonda T; Ikebe K; Ono T; Nokubi T
    J Oral Rehabil; 2004 Oct; 31(10):1001-6. PubMed ID: 15387841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In vitro study of a mandibular implant overdenture retained with ball, magnet, or bar attachments: comparison of load transfer and denture stability.
    Tokuhisa M; Matsushita Y; Koyano K
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(2):128-34. PubMed ID: 12737242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The influence of interimplant distance and attachment type on the retention characteristics of mandibular overdentures on 2 implants: initial retention values.
    Michelinakis G; Barclay CW; Smith PW
    Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(5):507-12. PubMed ID: 17323731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Three-dimensional force measurements with mandibular overdentures connected to implants by ball-shaped retentive anchors. A clinical study.
    Mericske-Stern R
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 9509778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparative in vitro study on the retention and stability of implant-supported overdentures.
    Sadig W
    Quintessence Int; 2009 Apr; 40(4):313-9. PubMed ID: 19417876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of attachment type on the mobility of implant-stabilized overdentures--an in vitro study.
    Setz JM; Wright PS; Ferman AM
    Int J Prosthodont; 2000; 13(6):494-9. PubMed ID: 11203675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of retention and release periods for implant overdenture attachments.
    Petropoulos VC; Smith W; Kousvelari E
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(2):176-85. PubMed ID: 9109267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparative study of four retentive anchor systems for implant supported overdentures--retention force changes.
    Bayer S; Steinheuser D; Grüner M; Keilig L; Enkling N; Stark H; Mues S
    Gerodontology; 2009 Dec; 26(4):268-72. PubMed ID: 19371390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Retention characteristics of attachment systems for implant overdentures.
    Chung KH; Chung CY; Cagna DR; Cronin RJ
    J Prosthodont; 2004 Dec; 13(4):221-6. PubMed ID: 15610542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Photoelastic stress analysis of various retention mechanisms on 3-implant-retained mandibular overdentures.
    Celik G; Uludag B
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Apr; 97(4):229-35. PubMed ID: 17499093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Implant overdentures: bar versus ball attachment for mandibular implant supported overdentures--a randomised clinical trial.
    SADJ; 2004 Feb; 59(1):28-9. PubMed ID: 15106482
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Attachment use for abutment supported prostheses.
    Mentag PJ; Kosinski TF
    Dent Today; 1990 Sep; 9(7):52-3. PubMed ID: 2132098
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Patient satisfaction with two designs of implant supported removable overdentures; ball attachment and magnets.
    Ellis JS; Burawi G; Walls A; Thomason JM
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Nov; 20(11):1293-8. PubMed ID: 19832769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Use of the integral implant for overdenture stabilization.
    Block MS; Kent JN; Finger IM
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1990; 5(2):140-7. PubMed ID: 2133339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.