212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21520838)
21. Cardiac CT: are we underestimating the dose? A radiation dose study utilizing the 2007 ICRP tissue weighting factors and a cardiac specific scan volume.
Gosling O; Loader R; Venables P; Rowles N; Morgan-Hughes G; Roobottom C
Clin Radiol; 2010 Dec; 65(12):1013-7. PubMed ID: 21070906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Relationships between physical dose quantities and patient dose in CT.
Hidajat N; Mäurer J; Schröder RJ; Nunnemann A; Wolf M; Pauli K; Felix R
Br J Radiol; 1999 Jun; 72(858):556-61. PubMed ID: 10560337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. 2007 recommendations of the ICRP change basis for estimation of the effective dose: what is the impact on radiation dose assessment of patient and personnel?
Boetticher Hv; Lachmund J; Looe HK; Hoffmann W; Poppe B
Rofo; 2008 May; 180(5):391-5. PubMed ID: 18438741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Towards dose reduction in CT: patient radiation dose assessment for CT examinations at university health center in Canada and comparison with national diagnostic reference levels.
Héliou R; Normandeau L; Beaudoin G
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 Jan; 148(2):202-10. PubMed ID: 21406432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Radiation exposure to patients in a multicenter coronary angiography trial (CORE 64).
Geleijns J; Joemai RM; Dewey M; de Roos A; Zankl M; Cantera AC; Artells MS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 May; 196(5):1126-32. PubMed ID: 21512080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Estimating cancer risks to adults undergoing body CT examinations.
Huda W; He W
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 Jun; 150(2):168-79. PubMed ID: 21926419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Influence of z overscanning on normalized effective doses calculated for pediatric patients undergoing multidetector CT examinations.
Tzedakis A; Damilakis J; Perisinakis K; Karantanas A; Karabekios S; Gourtsoyiannis N
Med Phys; 2007 Apr; 34(4):1163-75. PubMed ID: 17500447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Patient size and radiation exposure in thoracic, pelvic, and abdominal CT examinations performed with automatic exposure control.
Israel GM; Cicchiello L; Brink J; Huda W
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Dec; 195(6):1342-6. PubMed ID: 21098193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Changing radiation dose from diagnostic computed tomography examinations in Saskatchewan.
Dumaine CS; Leswick DA; Fladeland DA; Lim HJ; Toews LJ
Can Assoc Radiol J; 2012 Aug; 63(3):183-91. PubMed ID: 22054699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Effective doses to patients from CT acquisitions on the GE Infinia Hawkeye: a comparison of calculation methods.
Sawyer LJ; Starritt HC; Hiscock SC; Evans MJ
Nucl Med Commun; 2008 Feb; 29(2):144-9. PubMed ID: 18094636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The effect of z overscanning on patient effective dose from multidetector helical computed tomography examinations.
Tzedakis A; Damilakis J; Perisinakis K; Stratakis J; Gourtsoyiannis N
Med Phys; 2005 Jun; 32(6):1621-9. PubMed ID: 16013721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Estimation and comparison of effective dose (E) in standard chest CT by organ dose measurements and dose-length-product methods and assessment of the influence of CT tube potential (energy dependency) on effective dose in a dual-source CT.
Paul J; Banckwitz R; Krauss B; Vogl TJ; Maentele W; Bauer RW
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Apr; 81(4):e507-12. PubMed ID: 21703793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The ratio of ICRP103 to ICRP60 calculated effective doses from CT: Monte Carlo calculations with the ADELAIDE voxel paediatric model and comparisons with published values.
Caon M
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2013 Sep; 36(3):355-62. PubMed ID: 23860741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Radiation doses during computed tomography scan imaging in Hassan II Hospital, Agadir, Morocco.
Semghouli S; Amaoui B; Wakrim S
Pan Afr Med J; 2022; 41():290. PubMed ID: 35855039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Use of Multiphase CT Protocols in 18 Countries: Appropriateness and Radiation Doses.
Rastogi S; Singh R; Borse R; Valkovic Zujic P; Segota D; Diklic A; Jurkovic S; Ali A; Mohammed Kharita H; Al-Naemi HM; Alkalbani J; Al-Rasbi A; Gershan V; Galic S; Yusuf M; Avramova-Cholakova S; Zulkipli IMBH; Shein N; Teferi S; Rehani MM; Vassileva J; Kalra MK
Can Assoc Radiol J; 2021 Aug; 72(3):381-387. PubMed ID: 32063009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Results of the Austrian CT dose study 2010: typical effective doses of the most frequent CT examinations].
Homolka P; Leithner R; Billinger J; Gruber M
Z Med Phys; 2014 Sep; 24(3):224-30. PubMed ID: 24440650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Estimated radiation dose associated with low-dose chest CT of average-size participants in the National Lung Screening Trial.
Larke FJ; Kruger RL; Cagnon CH; Flynn MJ; McNitt-Gray MM; Wu X; Judy PF; Cody DD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Nov; 197(5):1165-9. PubMed ID: 22021510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Towards establishment of the national reference dose levels from computed tomography examinations in Tanzania.
Ngaile JE; Msaki P; Kazema R
J Radiol Prot; 2006 Jun; 26(2):213-25. PubMed ID: 16738417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Survey of pediatric MDCT radiation dose from university hospitals in Thailand: a preliminary for national dose survey.
Kritsaneepaiboon S; Trinavarat P; Visrutaratna P
Acta Radiol; 2012 Sep; 53(7):820-6. PubMed ID: 22821958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. On the use of Monte Carlo-derived dosimetric data in the estimation of patient dose from CT examinations.
Perisinakis K; Tzedakis A; Damilakis J
Med Phys; 2008 May; 35(5):2018-28. PubMed ID: 18561678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
