These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21521251)

  • 1. The need for systematic reviews of reasons.
    Sofaer N; Strech D
    Bioethics; 2012 Jul; 26(6):315-28. PubMed ID: 21521251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
    Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
    Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. How to write a systematic review of reasons.
    Strech D; Sofaer N
    J Med Ethics; 2012 Feb; 38(2):121-6. PubMed ID: 22080465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Systematic reviews in bioethics: types, challenges, and value.
    McDougall R
    J Med Philos; 2014 Feb; 39(1):89-97. PubMed ID: 24334289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Systematic reviews of empirical bioethics.
    Strech D; Synofzik M; Marckmann G
    J Med Ethics; 2008 Jun; 34(6):472-7. PubMed ID: 18511623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Do evidence summaries increase policy-makers' use of evidence from systematic reviews: A systematic review protocol.
    Petkovic J; Welch V; Tugwell P
    Syst Rev; 2015 Sep; 4():122. PubMed ID: 26411423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Current state of ethics literature synthesis: a systematic review of reviews.
    Mertz M; Kahrass H; Strech D
    BMC Med; 2016 Oct; 14(1):152. PubMed ID: 27716264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. What are the best methodologies for rapid reviews of the research evidence for evidence-informed decision making in health policy and practice: a rapid review.
    Haby MM; Chapman E; Clark R; Barreto J; Reveiz L; Lavis JN
    Health Res Policy Syst; 2016 Nov; 14(1):83. PubMed ID: 27884208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Systematic reviews: synthesis of best evidence for clinical decisions.
    Cook DJ; Mulrow CD; Haynes RB
    Ann Intern Med; 1997 Mar; 126(5):376-80. PubMed ID: 9054282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ethical decision-making models: a review of the literature.
    Cottone RR; Claus RE
    J Couns Dev; 2000; 78(3):275-83. PubMed ID: 14626235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Understanding systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Drug Ther Bull; 2013 Oct; 51(10):117-20. PubMed ID: 24113147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.
    MacKinnon K; Marcellus L; Rivers J; Gordon C; Ryan M; Butcher D
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 Jan; 13(1):14-26. PubMed ID: 26447004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Examining the suitability of the principle of subsidiarity for bioethics.
    Kotalik J
    Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 2010 Dec; 20(4):371-90. PubMed ID: 21338030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.
    Osborne SR; Alston LV; Bolton KA; Whelan J; Reeve E; Wong Shee A; Browne J; Walker T; Versace VL; Allender S; Nichols M; Backholer K; Goodwin N; Lewis S; Dalton H; Prael G; Curtin M; Brooks R; Verdon S; Crockett J; Hodgins G; Walsh S; Lyle DM; Thompson SC; Browne LJ; Knight S; Pit SW; Jones M; Gillam MH; Leach MJ; Gonzalez-Chica DA; Muyambi K; Eshetie T; Tran K; May E; Lieschke G; Parker V; Smith A; Hayes C; Dunlop AJ; Rajappa H; White R; Oakley P; Holliday S
    Med J Aust; 2020 Dec; 213 Suppl 11():S3-S32.e1. PubMed ID: 33314144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. What is the role of empirical research in bioethical reflection and decision-making? An ethical analysis.
    Borry P; Schotsmans P; Dierickx K
    Med Health Care Philos; 2004; 7(1):41-53. PubMed ID: 15139254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The use of economic evaluations in NHS decision-making: a review and empirical investigation.
    Williams I; McIver S; Moore D; Bryan S
    Health Technol Assess; 2008 Apr; 12(7):iii, ix-x, 1-175. PubMed ID: 18373906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Between reason and coercion: ethically permissible influence in health care and health policy contexts.
    Blumenthal-Barby JS
    Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 2012 Dec; 22(4):345-66. PubMed ID: 23420941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Gain-of-Function Research: Ethical Analysis.
    Selgelid MJ
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2016 Aug; 22(4):923-964. PubMed ID: 27502512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Systematic reviews and meta-analysis.
    Askie L; Offringa M
    Semin Fetal Neonatal Med; 2015 Dec; 20(6):403-9. PubMed ID: 26515266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Respect for cultural diversity in bioethics is an ethical imperative.
    Chattopadhyay S; De Vries R
    Med Health Care Philos; 2013 Nov; 16(4):639-45. PubMed ID: 22955969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.