These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Automation in clinical bacteriology: what system to choose? Greub G; Prod'hom G Clin Microbiol Infect; 2011 May; 17(5):655-60. PubMed ID: 21521409 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The way forward for fast microbiology. Mulatero F; Bonnardel V; Micolaud C Clin Microbiol Infect; 2011 May; 17(5):661-7. PubMed ID: 21521410 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Total Laboratory Automation: What Is Gained, What Is Lost, and Who Can Afford It? Thomson RB; McElvania E Clin Lab Med; 2019 Sep; 39(3):371-389. PubMed ID: 31383263 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Present and future automation in bacteriology. Dumitrescu O; Dauwalder O; Lina G Clin Microbiol Infect; 2011 May; 17(5):649-50. PubMed ID: 21521407 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Total laboratory automation: Do stat tests still matter? Dolci A; Giavarina D; Pasqualetti S; Szőke D; Panteghini M Clin Biochem; 2017 Jul; 50(10-11):605-611. PubMed ID: 28390779 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Anaerobes and laboratory automation: Like oil and water? Gajdács M Anaerobe; 2019 Oct; 59():112-114. PubMed ID: 31228670 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [The future of automation in bacteriology]. Mascart G; Martiny D; Miendje Y; Tummers G; Mahadeb B; Vandenberg O; Hallin M Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 2018 Aug; 76(4):365-372. PubMed ID: 30078775 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Laboratory automation in clinical bacteriology: what system to choose? Croxatto A; Prod'hom G; Faverjon F; Rochais Y; Greub G Clin Microbiol Infect; 2016 Mar; 22(3):217-35. PubMed ID: 26806135 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Advantages and limitations of total laboratory automation: a personal overview. Lippi G; Da Rin G Clin Chem Lab Med; 2019 May; 57(6):802-811. PubMed ID: 30710480 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Simoa HD-1 Analyzer: A Novel Fully Automated Digital Immunoassay Analyzer with Single-Molecule Sensitivity and Multiplexing. Wilson DH; Rissin DM; Kan CW; Fournier DR; Piech T; Campbell TG; Meyer RE; Fishburn MW; Cabrera C; Patel PP; Frew E; Chen Y; Chang L; Ferrell EP; von Einem V; McGuigan W; Reinhardt M; Sayer H; Vielsack C; Duffy DC J Lab Autom; 2016 Aug; 21(4):533-47. PubMed ID: 26077162 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [The current potentials for clinical laboratory analysis (a lecture)]. Men'shikov VV Klin Lab Diagn; 2000 Mar; (3):25-38. PubMed ID: 10878929 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Development and evaluation of an artificial intelligence for bacterial growth monitoring in clinical bacteriology. Jacot D; Gizha S; Orny C; Fernandes M; Tricoli C; Marcelpoil R; Prod'hom G; Volle J-M; Greub G; Croxatto A J Clin Microbiol; 2024 May; 62(5):e0165123. PubMed ID: 38572970 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Perspective technologies and researches in the areaof medical laboratory diagnostics]. Ivanov AM; Zhdanov KV; Krivoruchko AA; Ivoĭlov OO Voen Med Zh; 2013 Jun; 334(6):54-7. PubMed ID: 24000640 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The changing face of hemostasis testing in modern laboratories: consolidation, automation, and beyond. Lippi G; Plebani M; Favaloro EJ Semin Thromb Hemost; 2015 Apr; 41(3):294-9. PubMed ID: 25703516 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of the Risk of Laboratory Microbial Contamination during Routine Testing in Automated Clinical Chemistry and Microbiology Laboratories. Farnsworth CW; Wallace MA; Liu A; Gronowski AM; Burnham CD; Yarbrough ML Clin Chem; 2020 Sep; 66(9):1190-1199. PubMed ID: 32870987 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]