BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21523488)

  • 1. State estimation bias induced by optimization under uncertainty and error cost asymmetry is likely reflected in perception.
    Shimansky YP
    Biol Cybern; 2011 May; 104(4-5):225-33. PubMed ID: 21523488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cost optimization of DNAPL source and plume remediation under uncertainty using a semi-analytic model.
    Cardiff M; Liu X; Kitanidis PK; Parker J; Kim U
    J Contam Hydrol; 2010 Apr; 113(1-4):25-43. PubMed ID: 20185203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Guided adaptive optimal decision making approach for uncertainty based watershed scale load reduction.
    Liu Y; Zou R; Riverson J; Yang P; Guo H
    Water Res; 2011 Oct; 45(16):4885-95. PubMed ID: 21783223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [The analysis of physicians' work: announcing the end of attempts at in vitro fertilization].
    Santiago-Delefosse M; Cahen F; Coeffin-Driol C
    Encephale; 2003; 29(4 Pt 1):293-305. PubMed ID: 14615699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A stochastic optimization model under modeling uncertainty and parameter certainty for groundwater remediation design--part I. Model development.
    He L; Huang GH; Lu HW
    J Hazard Mater; 2010 Apr; 176(1-3):521-6. PubMed ID: 20006432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bias in error estimation when using cross-validation for model selection.
    Varma S; Simon R
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2006 Feb; 7():91. PubMed ID: 16504092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Identifying key parameters in cost-effectiveness analysis using value of information: a comparison of methods.
    Groot Koerkamp B; Myriam Hunink MG; Stijnen T; Weinstein MC
    Health Econ; 2006 Apr; 15(4):383-92. PubMed ID: 16389669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reflections on uncertainty in risk assessment and risk management by the Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC) precautionary principle workgroup.
    Sanderson H; Stahl CH; Irwin R; Rogers MD
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 52(6):73-9. PubMed ID: 16304937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impact of model, methodological, and parameter uncertainty in the economic analysis of vaccination programs.
    Brisson M; Edmunds WJ
    Med Decis Making; 2006; 26(5):434-46. PubMed ID: 16997923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Parameter uncertainty analysis of the non-point source pollution in the Daning River watershed of the Three Gorges Reservoir Region, China.
    Shen Z; Hong Q; Yu H; Liu R
    Sci Total Environ; 2008 Nov; 405(1-3):195-205. PubMed ID: 18639918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quantifying and reporting uncertainty from systematic errors.
    Phillips CV
    Epidemiology; 2003 Jul; 14(4):459-66. PubMed ID: 12843772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A complementary modelling approach to manage uncertainty of computationally expensive models.
    Vojinovic Z
    Water Sci Technol; 2007; 56(8):1-9. PubMed ID: 17978427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A stochastic optimization model under modeling uncertainty and parameter certainty for groundwater remediation design: part II. Model application.
    He L; Huang GH; Lu HW
    J Hazard Mater; 2010 Apr; 176(1-3):527-34. PubMed ID: 20006433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.
    Jardine C; Hrudey S; Shortreed J; Craig L; Krewski D; Furgal C; McColl S
    J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2003; 6(6):569-720. PubMed ID: 14698953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Biases and optimality of sensory-motor and cognitive decisions.
    Trommershäuser J
    Prog Brain Res; 2009; 174():267-78. PubMed ID: 19477345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accounting for both random errors and systematic errors in uncertainty propagation analysis of computer models involving experimental measurements with Monte Carlo methods.
    Vasquez VR; Whiting WB
    Risk Anal; 2005 Dec; 25(6):1669-81. PubMed ID: 16506991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. IFRP: a hybrid interval-parameter fuzzy robust programming approach for waste management planning under uncertainty.
    Nie XH; Huang GH; Li YP; Liu L
    J Environ Manage; 2007 Jul; 84(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 16854517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The meaning of the bias uncertainty measure.
    Bartley DL
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2008 Aug; 52(6):519-25. PubMed ID: 18535088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An interval-parameter stochastic robust optimization model for supporting municipal solid waste management under uncertainty.
    Xu Y; Huang GH; Qin XS; Cao MF; Sun Y
    Waste Manag; 2010 Feb; 30(2):316-27. PubMed ID: 19900798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Uncertainty reduction in intensity modulated proton therapy by inverse Monte Carlo treatment planning.
    Morávek Z; Rickhey M; Hartmann M; Bogner L
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Aug; 54(15):4803-19. PubMed ID: 19622848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.