These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21523488)

  • 21. Quantifying errors without random sampling.
    Phillips CV; LaPole LM
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2003 Jun; 3():9. PubMed ID: 12892568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Using atmospheric tracers to reduce uncertainty in groundwater recharge areas.
    Starn JJ; Bagtzoglou AC; Robbins GA
    Ground Water; 2010; 48(6):858-68. PubMed ID: 21416662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Sensitivity analysis of uncertainty in model prediction.
    Russi T; Packard A; Feeley R; Frenklach M
    J Phys Chem A; 2008 Mar; 112(12):2579-88. PubMed ID: 18303866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. An interval-based possibilistic programming method for waste management with cost minimization and environmental-impact abatement under uncertainty.
    Li YP; Huang GH
    Sci Total Environ; 2010 Sep; 408(20):4296-308. PubMed ID: 20591470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The use of uncertainty analysis as a food waste estimation tool.
    Langley J; Yoxall A; Manson G; Lewis W; Waterhouse A; Thelwall D; Thelwall S; Parry A; Leech B
    Waste Manag Res; 2009 May; 27(3):199-206. PubMed ID: 19423580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Experimental design for parameter estimation through sensitivity analysis.
    Schlosser PM
    J Toxicol Environ Health; 1994 Dec; 43(4):495-530. PubMed ID: 7990173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. On parameter estimation for biaxial mechanical behavior of arteries.
    Zeinali-Davarani S; Choi J; Baek S
    J Biomech; 2009 Mar; 42(4):524-30. PubMed ID: 19159887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The number needed to treat (NNT) can be adjusted for bias when the outcome is measured with error.
    Marschner IC; Emberson J; Irwig L; Walter SD
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2004 Dec; 57(12):1244-52. PubMed ID: 15617950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Uncertainty in urban flood damage assessment due to urban drainage modelling and depth-damage curve estimation.
    Freni G; La Loggia G; Notaro V
    Water Sci Technol; 2010; 61(12):2979-93. PubMed ID: 20555194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A frequency/consequence-based technique for visualizing and communicating uncertainty and perception of risk.
    Slavin D; Troy Tucker W; Ferson S
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2008 Apr; 1128():63-77. PubMed ID: 18469215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Probabilistic mechanisms in sensorimotor control.
    Körding KP; Wolpert DM
    Novartis Found Symp; 2006; 270():191-8; discussion 198-202, 232-7. PubMed ID: 16649715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Uncertainty assessment of input parameters for economic evaluation: Gauss's error propagation, an alternative to established methods.
    Stollenwerk B; Stock S; Siebert U; Lauterbach KW; Holle R
    Med Decis Making; 2010; 30(3):304-13. PubMed ID: 19815659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Using probabilistic terrorism risk modeling for regulatory benefit-cost analysis: application to the Western hemisphere travel initiative in the land environment.
    Willis HH; LaTourrette T
    Risk Anal; 2008 Apr; 28(2):325-39. PubMed ID: 18419652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.
    Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
    Eur J Health Econ; 2008 Nov; 9 Suppl 1():5-29. PubMed ID: 18987905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Parameter Estimation for Groundwater Models under Uncertain Irrigation Data.
    Demissie Y; Valocchi A; Cai X; Brozovic N; Senay G; Gebremichael M
    Ground Water; 2015; 53(4):614-25. PubMed ID: 25040235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Combining quantitative and qualitative measures of uncertainty in model-based environmental assessment: the NUSAP system.
    van der Sluijs JP; Craye M; Funtowicz S; Kloprogge P; Ravetz J; Risbey J
    Risk Anal; 2005 Apr; 25(2):481-92. PubMed ID: 15876219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. On the potential of measurement error to induce differential bias on odds ratio estimates: an example from radon epidemiology.
    Heid IM; Küchenhoff H; Wellmann J; Gerken M; Kreienbrock L; Wichmann HE
    Stat Med; 2002 Nov; 21(21):3261-78. PubMed ID: 12375303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Uncertainty quantification for radiation measurements: Bottom-up error variance estimation using calibration information.
    Burr T; Croft S; Krieger T; Martin K; Norman C; Walsh S
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2016 Feb; 108():49-57. PubMed ID: 26698221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Patient-specific parameter estimation in single-ventricle lumped circulation models under uncertainty.
    Schiavazzi DE; Baretta A; Pennati G; Hsia TY; Marsden AL
    Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2017 Mar; 33(3):. PubMed ID: 27155892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. JuPOETs: a constrained multiobjective optimization approach to estimate biochemical model ensembles in the Julia programming language.
    Bassen DM; Vilkhovoy M; Minot M; Butcher JT; Varner JD
    BMC Syst Biol; 2017 Jan; 11(1):10. PubMed ID: 28122561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.