These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21523735)

  • 1. Update on mammography trends: comparisons of rates in 2000, 2005, and 2008.
    Breen N; Gentleman JF; Schiller JS
    Cancer; 2011 May; 117(10):2209-18. PubMed ID: 21523735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Trends in mammography over time for women with and without chronic disability.
    Iezzoni LI; Kurtz SG; Rao SR
    J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2015 Jul; 24(7):593-601. PubMed ID: 26083235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Progress in cancer screening practices in the United States: results from the 2000 National Health Interview Survey.
    Swan J; Breen N; Coates RJ; Rimer BK; Lee NC
    Cancer; 2003 Mar; 97(6):1528-40. PubMed ID: 12627518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reported drop in mammography : is this cause for concern?
    Breen N; A Cronin K; Meissner HI; Taplin SH; Tangka FK; Tiro JA; McNeel TS
    Cancer; 2007 Jun; 109(12):2405-9. PubMed ID: 17503429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Was the drop in mammography rates in 2005 associated with the drop in hormone therapy use?
    Breen N; Cronin KA; Tiro JA; Meissner HI; McNeel TS; Sabatino SA; Tangka FK; Taplin SH
    Cancer; 2011 Dec; 117(24):5450-60. PubMed ID: 21861265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Trends in breast cancer screening in Missouri from 1987 to 1995, and predictions for the years 2000 and 2010.
    Sarr M; Simoes EJ; Murayi T; Figgs LT; Brownson RC
    Mo Med; 1998 Dec; 95(12):663-9. PubMed ID: 9863343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Trends in breast cancer by race and ethnicity: update 2006.
    Smigal C; Jemal A; Ward E; Cokkinides V; Smith R; Howe HL; Thun M
    CA Cancer J Clin; 2006; 56(3):168-83. PubMed ID: 16737949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Trends in mammography screening rates after publication of the 2009 US Preventive Services Task Force recommendations.
    Pace LE; He Y; Keating NL
    Cancer; 2013 Jul; 119(14):2518-23. PubMed ID: 23605683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Non-normal Screening Mammography Results, Lumpectomies, and Breast Cancer Reported by California Women, 2001-2009.
    Irvin VL; Breen N; Meissner HI; Liu B; Kaplan RM
    Womens Health Issues; 2015; 25(4):331-40. PubMed ID: 26070253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The recent decline in mammography rates is limited to low- to average-risk women.
    Slomiany BA; McMasters KM; Chagpar AB
    Am J Surg; 2008 Dec; 196(6):821-6; discussion 826. PubMed ID: 19095095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Breast Cancer Screening Among Women by Nativity, Birthplace, and Length of Time in the United States.
    Clarke TC; Endeshaw M; Duran D; Saraiya M
    Natl Health Stat Report; 2019 Oct; (129):1-15. PubMed ID: 31751203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Which women aren't getting mammograms and why? (United States).
    Meissner HI; Breen N; Taubman ML; Vernon SW; Graubard BI
    Cancer Causes Control; 2007 Feb; 18(1):61-70. PubMed ID: 17186422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Utilization of Screening Mammography in Women Before 50: Cross-Sectional Survey Results from the National Health Interview Survey.
    Vengalasetti YV; Narayan AK; Brown CA; Boakye-Ansa N; Strigel RM; Elezaby MA; Martin MD; Woods RW; Flores EJ; Miles RC
    Acad Radiol; 2023 Jun; 30(6):1101-1106. PubMed ID: 35965156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Trends in surgical treatment for breast cancer in Germany after the implementation of the mammography screening program.
    Trocchi P; Kuss O; Kääb-Sanyal V; Heidinger O; Stang A
    Eur J Epidemiol; 2019 Dec; 34(12):1143-1150. PubMed ID: 31650416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Breast cancer screening: recent trends in the use of mammography in Nebraska.
    Rettig B; Nelson N; Faulk R
    Nebr Med J; 1994 May; 79(5):136-8; discussion 139. PubMed ID: 8047188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Lack of Impact of the 2009 USPSTF Guidelines on Rates of Mammography Screening.
    Brown C; Nevola A; Martin BC
    J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2018 Jul; 27(7):875-884. PubMed ID: 29583065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Changes in access to screening mammography, 2008-2011.
    Elkin EB; Paige Nobles J; Pinheiro LC; Atoria CL; Schrag D
    Cancer Causes Control; 2013 May; 24(5):1057-9. PubMed ID: 23468282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Breast cancer incidence, 1980-2006: combined roles of menopausal hormone therapy, screening mammography, and estrogen receptor status.
    Glass AG; Lacey JV; Carreon JD; Hoover RN
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2007 Aug; 99(15):1152-61. PubMed ID: 17652280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. National Trends and Disparities in Mammography Among Commercially Insured Women, 2001-2010.
    Wharam JF; Landon BE; Xu X; Zhang F; Ross-Degnan D
    J Public Health Manag Pract; 2015; 21(5):426-32. PubMed ID: 26214535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Disparities in screening mammography. Current status, interventions and implications.
    Peek ME; Han JH
    J Gen Intern Med; 2004 Feb; 19(2):184-94. PubMed ID: 15009798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.