These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21524241)

  • 1. A comparison of traditional and computer-aided bracket placement methods.
    Israel M; Kusnoto B; Evans CA; Begole E
    Angle Orthod; 2011 Sep; 81(5):828-35. PubMed ID: 21524241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Force levels in complex tooth alignment with conventional and self-ligating brackets.
    Montasser MA; El-Bialy T; Keilig L; Reimann S; Jäger A; Bourauel C
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Apr; 143(4):507-14. PubMed ID: 23561412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Archwire diameter effect on tooth alignment with different bracket-archwire combinations.
    Montasser MA; Keilig L; Bourauel C
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Jan; 149(1):76-83. PubMed ID: 26718381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Porcelain brackets during initial alignment: are self-ligating cosmetic brackets more efficient?
    Miles P; Weyant R
    Aust Orthod J; 2010 May; 26(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 20575195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Forces released by nonconventional bracket or ligature systems during alignment of buccally displaced teeth.
    Franchi L; Baccetti T; Camporesi M; Giuntini V
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Sep; 136(3):316.e1-6; discussion 316-7. PubMed ID: 19732660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of maxillary arch dimensional changes with passive and active self-ligation and conventional brackets in the permanent dentition: a multicenter, randomized controlled trial.
    Fleming PS; Lee RT; Marinho V; Johal A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Aug; 144(2):185-93. PubMed ID: 23910199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of the kinetic frictional force between conventional plastic brackets with thermoplastic low-friction module ligation and self-ligating brackets.
    Yanase Y; Ioi H; Uehara M; Hara A; Nakata S; Nakasima A; Counts AL
    World J Orthod; 2009; 10(3):220-3. PubMed ID: 19885424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of mandibular arch changes during alignment and leveling with 2 preadjusted edgewise appliances.
    Fleming PS; DiBiase AT; Sarri G; Lee RT
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Sep; 136(3):340-7. PubMed ID: 19732667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An in vitro study into the efficacy of complex tooth alignment with conventional and self-ligating brackets.
    Montasser MA; Keilig L; Bourauel C
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2015 Feb; 18(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 25264808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Forces in the presence of ceramic versus stainless steel brackets with unconventional vs conventional ligatures.
    Baccetti T; Franchi L; Camporesi M
    Angle Orthod; 2008 Jan; 78(1):120-4. PubMed ID: 18193950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Three-dimensional analysis of the tooth movement and arch dimension changes in Class I malocclusions treated with first premolar extractions: a guideline for virtual treatment planning.
    Cho MY; Choi JH; Lee SP; Baek SH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Dec; 138(6):747-57. PubMed ID: 21130334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The clinical and laboratory effects of bracket type during canine distalization with sliding mechanics.
    Oz AA; Arici N; Arici S
    Angle Orthod; 2012 Mar; 82(2):326-32. PubMed ID: 21875316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of dental arch convexity and type of archwire on frictional forces.
    Fourie Z; Ozcan M; Sandham A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):14.e1-7; discussion 14-5. PubMed ID: 19577138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Numeric simulations of en-masse space closure with sliding mechanics.
    Kojima Y; Fukui H
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Dec; 138(6):702.e1-6; discussion 702-4. PubMed ID: 21130318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of archwire cross-section changes on force levels during complex tooth alignment with conventional and self-ligating brackets.
    Montasser MA; Keilig L; El-Bialy T; Reimann S; Jäger A; Bourauel C
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Apr; 147(4 Suppl):S101-8. PubMed ID: 25836341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The timing of significant arch dimensional changes with fixed orthodontic appliances: data from a multicenter randomised controlled trial.
    Fleming PS; Lee RT; Mcdonald T; Pandis N; Johal A
    J Dent; 2014 Jan; 42(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 24269833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accuracy of indirect bonding trays - a measurement algorithm.
    Koch PJ; Albrecht M; Lin WC; Jost-Brinkmann PG
    Int J Comput Dent; 2022 Sep; 25(3):295-302. PubMed ID: 35072417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Modification of the bidimensional system.
    Rinchuse DJ; Rinchuse DJ
    Orthodontics (Chic.); 2011; 12(1):10-21. PubMed ID: 21789286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Finishing effectiveness of different archwires using SmartClip™ self-ligating brackets: a clinical study.
    Ferrari S; Bellincampi M; Sfondrini MF; Caprioglio A; Gandini P
    Int Orthod; 2014 Mar; 12(1):125-38. PubMed ID: 24456630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mandibular dental arch changes associated with treatment of crowding using self-ligating and conventional brackets.
    Pandis N; Polychronopoulou A; Makou M; Eliades T
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Jun; 32(3):248-53. PubMed ID: 19959610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.