These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2152431)

  • 1. The bond strength of a glass polyalkenoate cement to enamel and stainless steel.
    Fricker JP; Kameda A
    Aust Orthod J; 1990 Mar; 11(3):161-3. PubMed ID: 2152431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Shear resistance of silver- and stainless steel-reinforced glass-ionomer cements bonded to enamel and dentin.
    Kerby RE
    Int J Prosthodont; 1992; 5(5):469-74. PubMed ID: 1290578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bond strength for orthodontic brackets contaminated by blood: composite versus resin-modified glass ionomer cements.
    Reddy L; Marker VA; Ellis E
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2003 Feb; 61(2):206-13. PubMed ID: 12618999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of the shear bond strength of a so-called 'dual-cured glass-ionomer cement' and a conventional resin composite used in orthodontic bonding.
    Phijaisanit P; Tyas MJ
    Aust Orthod J; 1997 Oct; 15(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 9528399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Orthodontic bracket bonding with a plasma-arc light and resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement.
    Ishikawa H; Komori A; Kojima I; Ando F
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Jul; 120(1):58-63. PubMed ID: 11455379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of in-vitro bond strengths between resin-modified glass ionomer, polyacid-modified composite resin, and giomer adhesive systems.
    Chitnis D; Dunn WJ; Gonzales DA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Mar; 129(3):330.e11-6. PubMed ID: 16527626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Retention of orthodontic bands with three different cements.
    Kocadereli I; Ciger S
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1995; 19(2):127-30. PubMed ID: 7577731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A new multipurpose dental adhesive for orthodontic use: an in vitro bond-strength study.
    Harari D; Aunni E; Gillis I; Redlich M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Sep; 118(3):307-10. PubMed ID: 10982932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The influence of dynamic fatigue loading on the separate components of the bracket-cement-enamel system.
    Algera TJ; Kleverlaan CJ; Prahl-Andersen B; Feilzer AJ
    Am J Dent; 2008 Aug; 21(4):239-43. PubMed ID: 18795520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Shear bond strength of glass ionomer cement for orthodontic bracket bonding].
    Hu W; Fu M; Sun Z
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2000 May; 35(3):227-9. PubMed ID: 11780232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Shear/peel bond strength of orthodontic attachments to moist and dry enamel.
    Nemeth BR; Wiltshire WA; Lavelle CL
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Mar; 129(3):396-401. PubMed ID: 16527636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. In vitro comparison of the shear bond strength of amalgam to tooth structure using two bonding agents--lutting glass ionomer and 4-META.
    Sheela K; Sudeep PT; Hegde V; Francis RF; Bhat KS
    Indian J Dent Res; 1998; 9(1):5-11. PubMed ID: 10530186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Biomechanical evaluation of bonding with glass ionomer cement.
    Ravindranath VK; Kapoor DN; Sharma VP
    J Pierre Fauchard Acad; 1993 Mar; 7(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 9791242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bond strength of brackets cemented with light-cured glass-ionomer cements to contaminated enamel.
    Itoh T; Fukushima T; Inoue Y; Matsuo N; Matsumoto M
    Am J Dent; 2000 Aug; 13(4):181-6. PubMed ID: 11763927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An in vitro comparison of four surface preparation techniques for veneering a compomer to stainless steel.
    Salama FS; el-Mallakh BF
    Pediatr Dent; 1997; 19(4):267-72. PubMed ID: 9200199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Strength of attachment between band and glass ionomer cement.
    Dastjerdie EV; Zarnegar H; Behnaz M; Seifi M
    Aust Orthod J; 2010 Nov; 26(2):149-52. PubMed ID: 21175024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bond strength evaluation of ceramic and stainless steel bracket bases subjected to cyclic tensile loading.
    Soderquist SA; Drummond JL; Evans CA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Feb; 129(2):175.e7-175.e12. PubMed ID: 16473707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison between the shear bond strength of brackets bonded to glazed and deglazed porcelain surfaces with resin-reinforced glass-ionomer cement and a bis-GMA resin adhesive.
    Lifshitz AB; Cárdenas M
    World J Orthod; 2006; 7(2):134-7. PubMed ID: 16779971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of pulpal fluid flow on tensile bond strength of a glass-ionomer cement: an in vivo and in vitro comparison.
    Tyler MW; Fitzgerald M; Dennison JB; Heys DR
    Oper Dent; 1994; 19(3):116-20. PubMed ID: 9028251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of temporary materials on bond strength of resin-modified glass-ionomer luting cements to teeth.
    Terata R; Nakashima K; Kubota M
    Am J Dent; 2000 Aug; 13(4):209-11. PubMed ID: 11763933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.