BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

252 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2152432)

  • 1. Intrusion and apical resorption of mandibular incisors in Begg treatment: anchorage bend or curve?
    Lew K
    Aust Orthod J; 1990 Mar; 11(3):164-8. PubMed ID: 2152432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of accentuated and reversed curve of Spee on apical root resorption.
    Chiqueto K; Martins DR; Janson G
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Feb; 133(2):261-8; quiz 328.e2. PubMed ID: 18249293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Begg appliance management of a moderately crowded Angle Class 11 Division 2 malocclusion.
    Ho HC; Dreyer CW
    Aust Orthod J; 1999 Nov; 15(5):313-9. PubMed ID: 10806939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of changes in the vertical facial dimension with different anchorage systems in extraction and non-extraction subjects treated by Begg fixed appliances: a retrospective study.
    Alkumru P; Erdem D; Altug-Atac AT
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Oct; 29(5):508-16. PubMed ID: 17974541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Apical root resorption comparison between Fränkel and eruption guidance appliances.
    Janson G; Nakamura A; de Freitas MR; Henriques JF; Pinzan A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jun; 131(6):729-35. PubMed ID: 17561050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A radiographic comparison of apical root resorption after orthodontic treatment with the edgewise and Speed appliances.
    Blake M; Woodside DG; Pharoah MJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1995 Jul; 108(1):76-84. PubMed ID: 7598108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. External apical root resorption in Class II malocclusion: a retrospective review of 1- versus 2-phase treatment.
    Brin I; Tulloch JF; Koroluk L; Philips C
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Aug; 124(2):151-6. PubMed ID: 12923510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Skeletal and dental changes with nonextraction Begg mechanotherapy in patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusion.
    Reddy P; Kharbanda OP; Duggal R; Parkash H
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Dec; 118(6):641-8. PubMed ID: 11113799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Midpalatal implants vs headgear for orthodontic anchorage--a randomized clinical trial: cephalometric results.
    Benson PE; Tinsley D; O'Dwyer JJ; Majumdar A; Doyle P; Sandler PJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Nov; 132(5):606-15. PubMed ID: 18005834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An unusual case of invasive cervical resorption after piezosurgery-assisted en masse retraction.
    Tunçer Nİ; Köseoğlu-Seçgin C; Arman-Özçırpıcı A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2019 Jul; 156(1):137-147. PubMed ID: 31256827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Class II correction in patients treated with class II elastics and with fixed functional appliances: a comparative study.
    Nelson B; Hansen K; Hägg U
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Aug; 118(2):142-9. PubMed ID: 10935954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A radiographic comparison of apical root resorption after orthodontic treatment with 3 different fixed appliance techniques.
    Janson GR; De Luca Canto G; Martins DR; Henriques JF; De Freitas MR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Sep; 118(3):262-73. PubMed ID: 10982926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of the intrusion effects on the maxillary incisors between implant anchorage and J-hook headgear.
    Deguchi T; Murakami T; Kuroda S; Yabuuchi T; Kamioka H; Takano-Yamamoto T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 May; 133(5):654-60. PubMed ID: 18456138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. External root resorption in orthodontics: avoiding high risk teeth. A case report.
    de Mûelenaere KR
    SADJ; 1998 Mar; 53(3):121-8. PubMed ID: 9722412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Factors related to root resorption in edgewise practice.
    Kaley J; Phillips C
    Angle Orthod; 1991; 61(2):125-32. PubMed ID: 2064070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Efficiency of three mandibular anchorage forms in Herbst treatment: a cephalometric investigation.
    Weschler D; Pancherz H
    Angle Orthod; 2005 Jan; 75(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 15747811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Is mild dental invagination a risk factor for apical root resorption in orthodontic patients?
    Mavragani M; Apisariyakul J; Brudvik P; Selvig KA
    Eur J Orthod; 2006 Aug; 28(4):307-12. PubMed ID: 16763089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cephalometric comparison of maxillary second molar extraction and nonextraction treatments in patients with Class II malocclusions.
    Waters D; Harris EF
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Dec; 120(6):608-13; quiz 677. PubMed ID: 11742305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Class II Division 1 malocclusion with severe overbite: cephalometric evaluation of the effects of orthodontic treatment.
    Marques LS; Ramos-Jorge ML; Araujo MT; Bolognese AM
    World J Orthod; 2008; 9(4):319-28. PubMed ID: 19146013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Apical root resorption after orthodontic treatment -- a retrospective study.
    Apajalahti S; Peltola JS
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Aug; 29(4):408-12. PubMed ID: 17631606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.