BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21524553)

  • 1. Differences among methods to validate genomic evaluations for dairy cattle.
    Olson KM; Vanraden PM; Tooker ME; Cooper TA
    J Dairy Sci; 2011 May; 94(5):2613-20. PubMed ID: 21524553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Multibreed genomic evaluations using purebred Holsteins, Jerseys, and Brown Swiss.
    Olson KM; VanRaden PM; Tooker ME
    J Dairy Sci; 2012 Sep; 95(9):5378-5383. PubMed ID: 22916944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Technical note: adjustment of traditional cow evaluations to improve accuracy of genomic predictions.
    Wiggans GR; Cooper TA; Vanraden PM; Cole JB
    J Dairy Sci; 2011 Dec; 94(12):6188-93. PubMed ID: 22118107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Predictive ability of direct genomic values for lifetime net merit of Holstein sires using selected subsets of single nucleotide polymorphism markers.
    Weigel KA; de los Campos G; González-Recio O; Naya H; Wu XL; Long N; Rosa GJ; Gianola D
    J Dairy Sci; 2009 Oct; 92(10):5248-57. PubMed ID: 19762843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The genomic evaluation system in the United States: past, present, future.
    Wiggans GR; Vanraden PM; Cooper TA
    J Dairy Sci; 2011 Jun; 94(6):3202-11. PubMed ID: 21605789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of methods for the implementation of genome-assisted evaluation of Spanish dairy cattle.
    Jiménez-Montero JA; González-Recio O; Alenda R
    J Dairy Sci; 2013 Jan; 96(1):625-34. PubMed ID: 23102955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Implications of avoiding overlap between training and testing data sets when evaluating genomic predictions of genetic merit.
    Amer PR; Banos G
    J Dairy Sci; 2010 Jul; 93(7):3320-30. PubMed ID: 20630248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accuracy of direct genomic values derived from imputed single nucleotide polymorphism genotypes in Jersey cattle.
    Weigel KA; de Los Campos G; Vazquez AI; Rosa GJ; Gianola D; Van Tassell CP
    J Dairy Sci; 2010 Nov; 93(11):5423-35. PubMed ID: 20965358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Technical note: adjustment of all cow evaluations for yield traits to be comparable with bull evaluations.
    Wiggans GR; Vanraden PM; Cooper TA
    J Dairy Sci; 2012 Jun; 95(6):3444-7. PubMed ID: 22612979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Multiple-trait genomic evaluation of linear type traits using genomic and phenotypic data in US Holsteins.
    Tsuruta S; Misztal I; Aguilar I; Lawlor TJ
    J Dairy Sci; 2011 Aug; 94(8):4198-204. PubMed ID: 21787955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Invited review: reliability of genomic predictions for North American Holstein bulls.
    VanRaden PM; Van Tassell CP; Wiggans GR; Sonstegard TS; Schnabel RD; Taylor JF; Schenkel FS
    J Dairy Sci; 2009 Jan; 92(1):16-24. PubMed ID: 19109259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Genetic markers for lactation persistency in primiparous Australian dairy cows.
    Pryce JE; Haile-Mariam M; Verbyla K; Bowman PJ; Goddard ME; Hayes BJ
    J Dairy Sci; 2010 May; 93(5):2202-14. PubMed ID: 20412936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of maturity rate of daughters on genetic ranking of Holstein bulls.
    Norman HD; Wright JR; Powell RL; Vanraden PM
    J Dairy Sci; 2005 Sep; 88(9):3337-45. PubMed ID: 16107424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Genomic inbreeding and relationships among Holsteins, Jerseys, and Brown Swiss.
    VanRaden PM; Olson KM; Wiggans GR; Cole JB; Tooker ME
    J Dairy Sci; 2011 Nov; 94(11):5673-82. PubMed ID: 22032391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prediction of most recent evaluations of Holstein bulls from first available pedigree information.
    Abdallah JM; McDaniel BT
    J Dairy Sci; 2002 Mar; 85(3):670-6. PubMed ID: 11949873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Hot topic: a unified approach to utilize phenotypic, full pedigree, and genomic information for genetic evaluation of Holstein final score.
    Aguilar I; Misztal I; Johnson DL; Legarra A; Tsuruta S; Lawlor TJ
    J Dairy Sci; 2010 Feb; 93(2):743-52. PubMed ID: 20105546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Methods for genomic evaluation of a relatively small genotyped dairy population and effect of genotyped cow information in multiparity analyses.
    Lourenco DA; Misztal I; Tsuruta S; Aguilar I; Ezra E; Ron M; Shirak A; Weller JI
    J Dairy Sci; 2014 Mar; 97(3):1742-52. PubMed ID: 24472123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accuracy and stability of national and international somatic cell score evaluations.
    Powell RL; Sanders AH; Norman HD
    J Dairy Sci; 2005 Jul; 88(7):2624-31. PubMed ID: 15956324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluating sire selection practices using lifetime net income functions.
    Cassell BG; Jobst SM; McGilliard ML; Pearson RE
    J Dairy Sci; 2002 Dec; 85(12):3492-502. PubMed ID: 12512623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of genomic selection on genetic improvement, inbreeding, and merit of young versus proven bulls.
    de Roos AP; Schrooten C; Veerkamp RF; van Arendonk JA
    J Dairy Sci; 2011 Mar; 94(3):1559-67. PubMed ID: 21338821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.