541 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21524789)
1. Influence of surface roughness on streptococcal adhesion forces to composite resins.
Mei L; Busscher HJ; van der Mei HC; Ren Y
Dent Mater; 2011 Aug; 27(8):770-8. PubMed ID: 21524789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Oral bacterial adhesion forces to biomaterial surfaces constituting the bracket-adhesive-enamel junction in orthodontic treatment.
Mei L; Busscher HJ; van der Mei HC; Chen Y; de Vries J; Ren Y
Eur J Oral Sci; 2009 Aug; 117(4):419-26. PubMed ID: 19627354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Surface characteristics of orthodontic materials and their effects on adhesion of mutans streptococci.
Lee SP; Lee SJ; Lim BS; Ahn SJ
Angle Orthod; 2009 Mar; 79(2):353-60. PubMed ID: 19216592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Streptococcus mutans biofilm adhesion on composite resin surfaces after different finishing and polishing techniques.
Pereira CA; Eskelson E; Cavalli V; Liporoni PC; Jorge AO; do Rego MA
Oper Dent; 2011; 36(3):311-7. PubMed ID: 21740238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Influence of surface roughness on oral streptococcal adhesion forces to dental filling materials].
Sainan Z; Li J; Lei Z; Liying H; Lu Y; Wei L
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2016 Oct; 34(5):448-453. PubMed ID: 28326699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Surface characteristics of orthodontic adhesives and effects on streptococcal adhesion.
Ahn SJ; Lim BS; Lee SJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Apr; 137(4):489-95; discussion 13A. PubMed ID: 20362908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Bacterial adhesion of Streptococcus mutans to provisional fixed prosthodontic material.
Buergers R; Rosentritt M; Handel G
J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Dec; 98(6):461-9. PubMed ID: 18061740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Adherence of Streptococcus mutans to uncoated and saliva-coated glass-ceramics and composites.
Kantorski KZ; Scotti R; Valandro LF; Bottino MA; Koga-Ito CY; Jorge AO
Gen Dent; 2008; 56(7):740-7; quiz 748-9, 768. PubMed ID: 19014037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effect of two polishing pastes on the surface roughness of bis-acryl composite and methacrylate-based resins.
Sen D; Göller G; Işsever H
J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Nov; 88(5):527-32. PubMed ID: 12474004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Streptococcal adhesion to novel low-shrink silorane-based restorative.
Buergers R; Schneider-Brachert W; Hahnel S; Rosentritt M; Handel G
Dent Mater; 2009 Feb; 25(2):269-75. PubMed ID: 18768217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Streptococcus mutans biofilm changes surface-topography of resin composites.
Beyth N; Bahir R; Matalon S; Domb AJ; Weiss EI
Dent Mater; 2008 Jun; 24(6):732-6. PubMed ID: 17897707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Immediate repair bond strengths of microhybrid, nanohybrid and nanofilled composites after different surface treatments.
Rinastiti M; Ozcan M; Siswomihardjo W; Busscher HJ
J Dent; 2010 Jan; 38(1):29-38. PubMed ID: 19735692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biofilm-induced changes to the composite surface.
Nedeljkovic I; De Munck J; Ungureanu AA; Slomka V; Bartic C; Vananroye A; Clasen C; Teughels W; Van Meerbeek B; Van Landuyt KL
J Dent; 2017 Aug; 63():36-43. PubMed ID: 28554609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of different finishing techniques for restorative materials on surface roughness and bacterial adhesion.
Aykent F; Yondem I; Ozyesil AG; Gunal SK; Avunduk MC; Ozkan S
J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Apr; 103(4):221-7. PubMed ID: 20362765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effects of surface roughness of composite resin on biofilm formation of Streptococcus mutans in the presence of saliva.
Park JW; Song CW; Jung JH; Ahn SJ; Ferracane JL
Oper Dent; 2012; 37(5):532-9. PubMed ID: 22339385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In situ evaluation of a new silorane-based composite resin's bioadhesion properties.
Claro-Pereira D; Sampaio-Maia B; Ferreira C; Rodrigues A; Melo LF; Vasconcelos MR
Dent Mater; 2011 Dec; 27(12):1238-45. PubMed ID: 22005004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Conventional polishing techniques versus a nanofilled surface sealer: preliminary findings regarding surface roughness changes and analysis.
Jefferies SR; Boston DW
J Clin Dent; 2010; 21(1):20-3. PubMed ID: 20527508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Surface roughness of enamel and four resin composites.
Botta AC; Duarte S; Paulin Filho PI; Gheno SM; Powers JM
Am J Dent; 2009 Oct; 22(5):252-4. PubMed ID: 20225464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Bacterial adhesion on smooth and rough titanium surfaces after treatment with different instruments.
Duarte PM; Reis AF; de Freitas PM; Ota-Tsuzuki C
J Periodontol; 2009 Nov; 80(11):1824-32. PubMed ID: 19905952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of a desensitizing paste containing 8% arginine and calcium carbonate on the surface roughness of dental materials and human dental enamel.
Garcia-Godoy F; Garcia-Godoy A; Garcia-Godoy C
Am J Dent; 2009 Mar; 22 Spec No A():21A-24A. PubMed ID: 19472558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
