236 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21525684)
1. Comparative evaluation of frictional characteristics of coated low friction ligatures - Super Slick Ties with conventional uncoated ligatures.
Leander D; Kumar JK
Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(1):90-4. PubMed ID: 21525684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Frictional resistances using Teflon-coated ligatures with various bracket-archwire combinations.
De Franco DJ; Spiller RE; von Fraunhofer JA
Angle Orthod; 1995; 65(1):63-72; discussion 73-4. PubMed ID: 7726464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Frictional characteristics of the newer orthodontic elastomeric ligatures.
Arun AV; Vaz AC
Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(1):95-9. PubMed ID: 21525685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Efficacy of Super Slick elastomeric modules in reducing friction during sliding: a comparative in vitro study.
Pattan SK; Peddu R; Bandaru SK; Lanka D; Mallavarapu K; Pathan AB
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2014 Sep; 15(5):543-51. PubMed ID: 25707823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An in vitro Evaluation of Friction Characteristics of Conventional Stainless Steel and Self-ligating Stainless Steel Brackets with different Dimensions of Archwires in Various Bracket-archwire Combination.
Sridharan K; Sandbhor S; Rajasekaran UB; Sam G; Ramees MM; Abraham EA
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Aug; 18(8):660-664. PubMed ID: 28816185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An in vitro study into the efficacy of complex tooth alignment with conventional and self-ligating brackets.
Montasser MA; Keilig L; Bourauel C
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2015 Feb; 18(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 25264808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative Evaluation of Frictional Resistance Between Different Types of Ceramic Brackets and Stainless Steel Brackets With Teflon-Coated Stainless Steel and Stainless Steel Archwires: An In-Vitro Study.
Bhat KRR; Ahmed N; Joseph R; Younus A A
Cureus; 2022 Apr; 14(4):e24161. PubMed ID: 35586355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An in vitro investigation of the influence of self-ligating brackets, low friction ligatures, and archwire on frictional resistance.
Tecco S; Di Iorio D; Cordasco G; Verrocchi I; Festa F
Eur J Orthod; 2007 Aug; 29(4):390-7. PubMed ID: 17702800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Friction behavior of ceramic injection-molded (CIM) brackets.
Reimann S; Bourauel C; Weber A; Dirk C; Lietz T
J Orofac Orthop; 2016 Jul; 77(4):262-71. PubMed ID: 27142040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of the friction forces delivered by different elastomeric patterns and metal ligature on conventional metal brackets with a NiTi arch wire versus a self-ligating system: An in vitro study.
Pieroni M; Ferraz Facury AGB; Santamaria-Jr M; Correr AB; Correr-Sobrinho L; Vedovello Filho M; Costa AR; Neves JG
Int Orthod; 2022 Jun; 20(2):100633. PubMed ID: 35339407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of Frictional Forces Generated by a New Ceramic Bracket with the Conventional Brackets using Unconventional and Conventional Ligation System and the Self-ligating Brackets: An In Vitro Study.
Pasha A; Vishwakarma S; Narayan A; Vinay K; Shetty SV; Roy PP
J Int Oral Health; 2015 Sep; 7(9):108-13. PubMed ID: 26435628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of archwire cross-section changes on force levels during complex tooth alignment with conventional and self-ligating brackets.
Montasser MA; Keilig L; El-Bialy T; Reimann S; Jäger A; Bourauel C
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Apr; 147(4 Suppl):S101-8. PubMed ID: 25836341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Force levels in complex tooth alignment with conventional and self-ligating brackets.
Montasser MA; El-Bialy T; Keilig L; Reimann S; Jäger A; Bourauel C
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Apr; 143(4):507-14. PubMed ID: 23561412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Friction behavior of self-ligating and conventional brackets with different ligature systems.
Szczupakowski A; Reimann S; Dirk C; Keilig L; Weber A; Jäger A; Bourauel C
J Orofac Orthop; 2016 Jul; 77(4):287-95. PubMed ID: 27220902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Resistance to sliding with 3 types of elastomeric modules.
Griffiths HS; Sherriff M; Ireland AJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Jun; 127(6):670-5; quiz 754. PubMed ID: 15953891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of different ligation methods on friction.
Hain M; Dhopatkar A; Rock P
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Nov; 130(5):666-70. PubMed ID: 17110266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparison of the forces required to produce tooth movement in vitro using two self-ligating brackets and a pre-adjusted bracket employing two types of ligation.
Sims AP; Waters NE; Birnie DJ; Pethybridge RJ
Eur J Orthod; 1993 Oct; 15(5):377-85. PubMed ID: 8223972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Frictional resistance between orthodontic brackets and archwires in the buccal segments.
Taylor NG; Ison K
Angle Orthod; 1996; 66(3):215-22. PubMed ID: 8805917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effect of Teflon coating on the resistance to sliding of orthodontic archwires.
Farronato G; Maijer R; Carìa MP; Esposito L; Alberzoni D; Cacciatore G
Eur J Orthod; 2012 Aug; 34(4):410-7. PubMed ID: 21478301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effect of ligation method on friction in sliding mechanics.
Hain M; Dhopatkar A; Rock P
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Apr; 123(4):416-22. PubMed ID: 12695769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
