123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2152980)
1. Focal hepatic lesions: comparative MR imaging at 0.5 and 1.5 T.
Steinberg HV; Alarcon JJ; Bernardino ME
Radiology; 1990 Jan; 174(1):153-6. PubMed ID: 2152980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Evaluation of rapid gradient-echo and turbo-spin-echo sequences in MRT of focal liver lesions using 0.5 tesla].
Kreft B; Layer G; Spiller L; Träber F; Wolff M; Gieseke J; Steudel A
Rofo; 1994 Dec; 161(6):512-8. PubMed ID: 7803774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fast multiplanar spoiled gradient-recalled imaging of the liver: pulse sequence optimization and comparison with spin-echo MR imaging.
Low RN; Francis IR; Herfkens RJ; Jeffrey RB; Glazer GM; Foo TK; Shimakawa A; Pelc NJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Mar; 160(3):501-9. PubMed ID: 8381572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Phased array breath-hold versus non-breath-hold MR imaging of focal liver lesions: a prospective comparative study.
Yamashita Y; Yamamoto H; Namimoto T; Abe Y; Takahashi M
J Magn Reson Imaging; 1997; 7(2):292-7. PubMed ID: 9090580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Can a multiphasic contrast-enhanced three-dimensional fast spoiled gradient-recalled echo sequence be sufficient for liver MR imaging?
Coulam CH; Chan FP; Li KC
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Feb; 178(2):335-41. PubMed ID: 11804888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Focal nodular hyperplasia of the liver: MR findings in 35 proved cases.
Lee MJ; Saini S; Hamm B; Taupitz M; Hahn PF; Seneterre E; Ferrucci JT
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1991 Feb; 156(2):317-20. PubMed ID: 1898806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Hepatocellular carcinoma in the cirrhotic liver: gadolinium-enhanced 3D T1-weighted MR imaging as a stand-alone sequence for diagnosis.
Hecht EM; Holland AE; Israel GM; Hahn WY; Kim DC; West AB; Babb JS; Taouli B; Lee VS; Krinsky GA
Radiology; 2006 May; 239(2):438-47. PubMed ID: 16641353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Multisection FLASH: method for breath-hold MR imaging of the entire liver.
Taupitz M; Hamm B; Speidel A; Deimling M; Branding G; Wolf KJ
Radiology; 1992 Apr; 183(1):73-9. PubMed ID: 1312734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. T2-weighted MR imaging in the assessment of cirrhotic liver.
Hussain HK; Syed I; Nghiem HV; Johnson TD; Carlos RC; Weadock WJ; Francis IR
Radiology; 2004 Mar; 230(3):637-44. PubMed ID: 14739306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Proton spectroscopic imaging (Dixon method) of the liver: clinical utility.
Schertz LD; Lee JK; Heiken JP; Molina PL; Totty WG
Radiology; 1989 Nov; 173(2):401-5. PubMed ID: 2552499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Liver masses: replacement of conventional T2-weighted spin-echo MR imaging with breath-hold MR imaging.
Gaa J; Hatabu H; Jenkins RL; Finn JP; Edelman RR
Radiology; 1996 Aug; 200(2):459-64. PubMed ID: 8685342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fast MR imaging of the liver: quantitative comparison of techniques.
Siewert B; Müller MF; Foley M; Wielopolski PA; Finn JP
Radiology; 1994 Oct; 193(1):37-42. PubMed ID: 8090918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of inversion-recovery gradient- and spin-echo and fast spin-echo techniques in the detection and characterization of liver lesions.
Pijl ME; Wasser MN; van Persijn van Meerten EL; Gratama JW; van de Velde CJ; Hermans J; Elevelt A; Bloem JL
Radiology; 1998 Nov; 209(2):427-34. PubMed ID: 9807569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Magnetic resonance imaging of musculoskeletal lesions: comparison of three fat-saturation pulse sequences.
Pui MH; Goh PS; Choo HF; Fok EC
Australas Radiol; 1997 May; 41(2):99-102. PubMed ID: 9153802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Focal liver lesions: characterization with conventional spin-echo versus fast spin-echo T2-weighted MR imaging.
Schima W; Saini S; Echeverri JA; Hahn PF; Harisinghani M; Mueller PR
Radiology; 1997 Feb; 202(2):389-93. PubMed ID: 9015063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. MR imaging of hepatic masses: diagnostic significance of wedge-shaped areas of increased signal intensity surrounding the lesion.
Giovagnoni A; Terilli F; Ercolani P; Paci E; Piga A
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Nov; 163(5):1093-7. PubMed ID: 7976881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Role of magnetic resonance in the follow-up o hepatocarcinoma treated with percutaneous ethanol injection (PEI) or transarterial chemoembolization (TACE)].
De Cobelli F; Castrucci M; Sironi S; Livraghi T; Venturini M; Salvioni M; Del Maschio A
Radiol Med; 1994 Dec; 88(6):806-17. PubMed ID: 7878241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Comparison of fast turbo-spin-echo and gradient- and spin-echo sequences as well as echo planar imaging with conventional spin-echo sequences in MRI of focal liver lesions at 1.0 tesla].
Jung G; Krahe T; Kugel H; Gieseke J; Walter C; Fischbach R; Landwehr P
Rofo; 1996 Aug; 165(2):137-43. PubMed ID: 8924665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Short TI inversion-recovery imaging of the liver: pulse-sequence optimization and comparison with spin-echo imaging.
Dousset M; Weissleder R; Hendrick RE; Stark DD; Fretz CJ; Elizondo G; Hahn PF; Saini S; Ferrucci JT
Radiology; 1989 May; 171(2):327-33. PubMed ID: 2704797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Focal liver lesions: MR imaging with Mn-DPDP--initial clinical results in 40 patients.
Hamm B; Vogl TJ; Branding G; Schnell B; Taupitz M; Wolf KJ; Lissner J
Radiology; 1992 Jan; 182(1):167-74. PubMed ID: 1309218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
