These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

846 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21529848)

  • 1. On-pump versus off-pump surgical revascularization in patients with acute coronary syndromes: analysis from the Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage Strategy trial.
    Ben-Gal Y; Stone GW; Smith CR; Williams MR; Weisz G; Stewart AS; Takayama H; Genereux P; Argenziano M
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2011 Aug; 142(2):e33-9. PubMed ID: 21529848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Propensity case-matched analysis of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with atheromatous aortic disease.
    Sharony R; Grossi EA; Saunders PC; Galloway AC; Applebaum R; Ribakove GH; Culliford AT; Kanchuger M; Kronzon I; Colvin SB
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2004 Feb; 127(2):406-13. PubMed ID: 14762348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Early and long-term outcomes in the elderly: comparison between off-pump and on-pump techniques in 1191 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting.
    Li Y; Zheng Z; Hu S
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2008 Sep; 136(3):657-64. PubMed ID: 18805269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. On-pump beating-heart coronary artery bypass grafting after acute myocardial infarction has lower mortality and morbidity.
    Miyahara K; Matsuura A; Takemura H; Saito S; Sawaki S; Yoshioka T; Ito H
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2008 Mar; 135(3):521-6. PubMed ID: 18329463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. No major differences in 30-day outcomes in high-risk patients randomized to off-pump versus on-pump coronary bypass surgery: the best bypass surgery trial.
    Møller CH; Perko MJ; Lund JT; Andersen LW; Kelbaek H; Madsen JK; Winkel P; Gluud C; Steinbrüchel DA
    Circulation; 2010 Feb; 121(4):498-504. PubMed ID: 20083683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Propensity case-matched analysis of off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with atheromatous aorta.
    Mishra M; Malhotra R; Karlekar A; Mishra Y; Trehan N
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2006 Aug; 82(2):608-14. PubMed ID: 16863772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Is off-pump superior to conventional coronary artery bypass grafting in diabetic patients with multivessel disease?
    Emmert MY; Salzberg SP; Seifert B; Rodriguez H; Plass A; Hoerstrup SP; Grünenfelder J; Falk V
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2011 Jul; 40(1):233-9. PubMed ID: 21167727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. On-pump versus off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery in high-risk patients: operative results of a prospective randomized trial (on-off study).
    Lemma MG; Coscioni E; Tritto FP; Centofanti P; Fondacone C; Salica A; Rossi A; De Santo T; Di Benedetto G; Piazza L; Rinaldi M; Schinosa AL; De Paulis R; Contino M; Genoni M
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012 Mar; 143(3):625-31. PubMed ID: 22154798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of coronary bypass surgery with and without cardiopulmonary bypass in patients with multivessel disease.
    Mack MJ; Pfister A; Bachand D; Emery R; Magee MJ; Connolly M; Subramanian V
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2004 Jan; 127(1):167-73. PubMed ID: 14752427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Three-year follow-up in a subset of high-risk patients randomly assigned to off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: the Best Bypass Surgery trial.
    Møller CH; Perko MJ; Lund JT; Andersen LW; Kelbæk H; Madsen JK; Winkel P; Gluud C; Steinbrüchel DA
    Heart; 2011 Jun; 97(11):907-13. PubMed ID: 21415073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting provides complete revascularization with reduced myocardial injury, transfusion requirements, and length of stay: a prospective randomized comparison of two hundred unselected patients undergoing off-pump versus conventional coronary artery bypass grafting.
    Puskas JD; Williams WH; Duke PG; Staples JR; Glas KE; Marshall JJ; Leimbach M; Huber P; Garas S; Sammons BH; McCall SA; Petersen RJ; Bailey DE; Chu H; Mahoney EM; Weintraub WS; Guyton RA
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2003 Apr; 125(4):797-808. PubMed ID: 12698142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. On- and off-pump coronary surgery and perioperative myocardial infarction: an issue between incomplete and extensive revascularization.
    Alamanni F; Dainese L; Naliato M; Gregu S; Agrifoglio M; Polvani GL; Biglioli P; Parolari A;
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2008 Jul; 34(1):118-26. PubMed ID: 18450460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. On-pump versus off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in diabetic patients: a propensity score analysis.
    Srinivasan AK; Grayson AD; Fabri BM
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2004 Nov; 78(5):1604-9. PubMed ID: 15511441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Equivalent midterm outcomes after off-pump and on-pump coronary surgery.
    Sabik JF; Blackstone EH; Lytle BW; Houghtaling PL; Gillinov AM; Cosgrove DM
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2004 Jan; 127(1):142-8. PubMed ID: 14752424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical outcomes of nonelective coronary revascularization with and without cardiopulmonary bypass.
    Stamou SC; Hill PC; Haile E; Prince S; Mack MJ; Corso PJ
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2006 Jan; 131(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 16399291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Coronary Artery Revascularization (CARE) registry: an observational study of on-pump and off-pump coronary artery revascularization.
    Palmer G; Herbert MA; Prince SL; Williams JL; Magee MJ; Brown P; Katz M; Mack MJ
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2007 Mar; 83(3):986-91; discussion 991-2. PubMed ID: 17307446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reoperative coronary artery bypass grafting: analysis of early and late outcomes.
    Di Mauro M; Iacò AL; Contini M; Teodori G; Vitolla G; Pano M; Di Giammarco G; Calafiore AM
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2005 Jan; 79(1):81-7. PubMed ID: 15620920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Intraprocedural thrombotic events during percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes are associated with adverse outcomes: analysis from the ACUITY (Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage Strategy) trial.
    McEntegart MB; Kirtane AJ; Cristea E; Brener S; Mehran R; Fahy M; Moses JW; Stone GW
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2012 May; 59(20):1745-51. PubMed ID: 22575311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Optimal timing of coronary artery bypass after acute myocardial infarction: a review of California discharge data.
    Weiss ES; Chang DD; Joyce DL; Nwakanma LU; Yuh DD
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2008 Mar; 135(3):503-11, 511.e1-3. PubMed ID: 18329460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Surgical versus percutaneous revascularization for multivessel disease in patients with acute coronary syndromes: analysis from the ACUITY (Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage Strategy) trial.
    Ben-Gal Y; Moses JW; Mehran R; Lansky AJ; Weisz G; Nikolsky E; Argenziano M; Williams MR; Colombo A; Aylward PE; Stone GW
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2010 Oct; 3(10):1059-67. PubMed ID: 20965465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 43.