These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21530381)
21. A mixed methods systematic review of the effects of patient online self-diagnosing in the 'smart-phone society' on the healthcare professional-patient relationship and medical authority. Farnood A; Johnston B; Mair FS BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2020 Oct; 20(1):253. PubMed ID: 33023577 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Patient perspectives on online health information and communication with doctors: a qualitative study of patients 50 years old and over. Silver MP J Med Internet Res; 2015 Jan; 17(1):e19. PubMed ID: 25586865 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. What factors influence the treatment decisions of women with breast cancer? Does residential location play a role? Youl P; Morris B; Jenny A; Morstyn L Rural Remote Health; 2019 May; 19(2):4497. PubMed ID: 31129973 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The Effect of Screen-to-Screen Versus Face-to-Face Consultation on Doctor-Patient Communication: An Experimental Study with Simulated Patients. Tates K; Antheunis ML; Kanters S; Nieboer TE; Gerritse MB J Med Internet Res; 2017 Dec; 19(12):e421. PubMed ID: 29263017 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Self-reported differences in empowerment between lurkers and posters in online patient support groups. van Uden-Kraan CF; Drossaert CH; Taal E; Seydel ER; van de Laar MA J Med Internet Res; 2008 Jun; 10(2):e18. PubMed ID: 18653442 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Factors Associated with Use of Interactive Cancer Communication System: An Application of the Comprehensive Model of Information Seeking. Han JY; Wise M; Kim E; Pingree R; Hawkins RP; Pingree S; McTavish F; Gustafson DH J Comput Mediat Commun; 2010 Apr; 15(3):367-388. PubMed ID: 21760702 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. How cancer survivors provide support on cancer-related Internet mailing lists. Meier A; Lyons EJ; Frydman G; Forlenza M; Rimer BK J Med Internet Res; 2007 May; 9(2):e12. PubMed ID: 17513283 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Effectiveness of Interactive Tools in Online Health Care Communities: Social Exchange Theory Perspective. Ren D; Ma B J Med Internet Res; 2021 Mar; 23(3):e21892. PubMed ID: 33709940 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Follow-up care after breast cancer treatment: experiences and perceptions of service provision and provider interactions in rural Australian women. Lawler S; Spathonis K; Masters J; Adams J; Eakin E Support Care Cancer; 2011 Dec; 19(12):1975-82. PubMed ID: 21080202 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Communicating about self and others within an online support group for women with breast cancer and subsequent outcomes. Shaw BR; Jeong Yeob Han ; Hawkins RP; McTavish FM; Gustafson DH J Health Psychol; 2008 Oct; 13(7):930-9. PubMed ID: 18809644 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol. Newell S; Jordan Z JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 Jan; 13(1):76-87. PubMed ID: 26447009 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Cognitive and affective determinants of decisions to attend a group psychosocial support program for women with breast cancer. Cameron LD; Booth RJ; Schlatter M; Ziginskas D; Harman JE; Benson SR Psychosom Med; 2005; 67(4):584-9. PubMed ID: 16046371 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The health and well-being of caregivers of children with cerebral palsy. Raina P; O'Donnell M; Rosenbaum P; Brehaut J; Walter SD; Russell D; Swinton M; Zhu B; Wood E Pediatrics; 2005 Jun; 115(6):e626-36. PubMed ID: 15930188 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Consumer participation in the development of psychosocial clinical practice guidelines: opinions of women with breast cancer. Rankin N; Newell S; Sanson-Fisher R; Girgis A Eur J Cancer Care (Engl); 2000 Jun; 9(2):97-104. PubMed ID: 11261017 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Exploring the black box of a decision aid: what information do patients select from an interactive Cd-Rom on treatment options in breast cancer? Molenaar S; Sprangers M; Oort F; Rutgers E; Luiten E; Mulder J; van Meeteren M; de Haes H Patient Educ Couns; 2007 Jan; 65(1):122-30. PubMed ID: 16945498 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Online information and support needs of women with advanced breast cancer: a qualitative analysis. Kemp E; Koczwara B; Butow P; Turner J; Girgis A; Schofield P; Hulbert-Williams N; Levesque J; Spence D; Vatandoust S; Kichenadasse G; Roy A; Sukumaran S; Karapetis CS; Richards C; Fitzgerald M; Beatty L Support Care Cancer; 2018 Oct; 26(10):3489-3496. PubMed ID: 29693203 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The effect of interactive factors on online health consultation review deviation: An empirical investigation. He Y; Guo X; Wu T; Vogel D Int J Med Inform; 2022 Jul; 163():104781. PubMed ID: 35512623 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Patient-physician interactions during early breast-cancer treatment: results from an international online survey. Lansdown M; Martin L; Fallowfield L Curr Med Res Opin; 2008 Jul; 24(7):1891-904. PubMed ID: 18507893 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Engagement in an Interactive App for Symptom Self-Management during Treatment in Patients With Breast or Prostate Cancer: Mixed Methods Study. Crafoord MT; Fjell M; Sundberg K; Nilsson M; Langius-Eklöf A J Med Internet Res; 2020 Aug; 22(8):e17058. PubMed ID: 32663140 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]