265 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21532247)
1. [Assessment of cross-sectional area and diameter of carotid artery using time-of-flight MR angiography and CT angiography].
Yasuda E; Miyati T
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2011; 67(4):367-73. PubMed ID: 21532247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Highly accelerated time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography using spiral imaging improves conspicuity of intracranial arterial branches while reducing scan time.
Greve T; Sollmann N; Hock A; Hey S; Gnanaprakasam V; Nijenhuis M; Zimmer C; Kirschke JS
Eur Radiol; 2020 Feb; 30(2):855-865. PubMed ID: 31664504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Contrast-enhanced MR angiography is not more accurate than unenhanced 2D time-of-flight MR angiography for determining > or = 70% internal carotid artery stenosis.
Babiarz LS; Romero JM; Murphy EK; Brobeck B; Schaefer PW; González RG; Lev MH
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2009 Apr; 30(4):761-8. PubMed ID: 19164440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. 3 T contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography for evaluation of the intracranial arteries: comparison with time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography and multislice computed tomography angiography.
Villablanca JP; Nael K; Habibi R; Nael A; Laub G; Finn JP
Invest Radiol; 2006 Nov; 41(11):799-805. PubMed ID: 17035870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Improved carotid lumen delineation on non-contrast MR angiography using SNAP (Simultaneous Non-Contrast Angiography and Intraplaque Hemorrhage) imaging.
Liu H; Sun J; Hippe DS; Wu W; Chu B; Balu N; Hatsukami T; Yuan C
Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Oct; 62():87-93. PubMed ID: 31247251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prospective evaluation of extracranial carotid stenosis: MR angiography with maximum-intensity projections and multiplanar reformation compared with conventional angiography.
De Marco JK; Nesbit GM; Wesbey GE; Richardson D
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Nov; 163(5):1205-12. PubMed ID: 7976902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. MR angiography at 3 Tesla to assess proximal internal carotid artery stenoses: contrast-enhanced or 3D time-of-flight MR angiography?
Weber J; Veith P; Jung B; Ihorst G; Moske-Eick O; Meckel S; Urbach H; Taschner CA
Clin Neuroradiol; 2015 Mar; 25(1):41-8. PubMed ID: 24384680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Dual-energy CT angiography for evaluation of internal carotid artery stenosis and occlusion].
Chen Y; Xue HD; Jin ZY; Liu W; Sun H; Wang X; Zhao WM; Wang Y; Mu WB
Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 2009 Apr; 31(2):215-20. PubMed ID: 19507603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Detection of Symptomatic Carotid Plaque Using Source Data from MR and CT Angiography: A Correlative Study.
Gupta A; Baradaran H; Mtui EE; Kamel H; Pandya A; Giambrone A; Iadecola C; Sanelli PC
Cerebrovasc Dis; 2015; 39(3-4):151-61. PubMed ID: 25721945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Bone subtraction CTA for transcranial arteries: intra-individual comparison with standard CTA without bone subtraction and TOF-MRA.
Buerke B; Puesken M; Wittkamp G; Stehling C; Ditt H; Seidensticker P; Wessling J; Heindel W; Kloska SP
Clin Radiol; 2010 Jun; 65(6):440-6. PubMed ID: 20451010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Diagnostic accuracy of colour Doppler ultrasonography, CT angiography and blood-pool-enhanced MR angiography in assessing carotid stenosis: a comparative study with DSA in 170 patients.
Anzidei M; Napoli A; Zaccagna F; Di Paolo P; Saba L; Cavallo Marincola B; Zini C; Cartocci G; Di Mare L; Catalano C; Passariello R
Radiol Med; 2012 Feb; 117(1):54-71. PubMed ID: 21424318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fluoroscopically triggered contrast-enhanced 3D MR DSA and 3D time-of-flight turbo MRA of the carotid arteries: first clinical experiences in correlation with ultrasound, x-ray angiography, and endarterectomy findings.
Fellner FA; Fellner C; Wutke R; Lang W; Laub G; Schmidt M; Janka R; Denzel C; Bautz W
Magn Reson Imaging; 2000 Jun; 18(5):575-85. PubMed ID: 10913719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of carotid artery stenosis with multisection CT and MR imaging: influence of imaging modality and postprocessing.
Lell M; Fellner C; Baum U; Hothorn T; Steiner R; Lang W; Bautz W; Fellner FA
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2007 Jan; 28(1):104-10. PubMed ID: 17213434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dual-energy CTA with bone removal for transcranial arteries: intraindividual comparison with standard CTA without bone removal and TOF-MRA.
Buerke B; Wittkamp G; Seifarth H; Heindel W; Kloska SP
Acad Radiol; 2009 Nov; 16(11):1348-55. PubMed ID: 19608437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Agreement of multislice CT angiography and MR angiography in assessing the degree of carotid artery stenosis in consideration of different methods of postprocessing.
Hackländer T; Wegner H; Hoppe S; Danckworth A; Kempkes U; Fischer M; Mertens H; Caldwell JH
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2006; 30(3):433-42. PubMed ID: 16778618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An international multicenter comparison of time-SLIP unenhanced MR angiography and contrast-enhanced CT angiography for assessing renal artery stenosis: the renal artery contrast-free trial.
Albert TS; Akahane M; Parienty I; Yellin N; Catalá V; Alomar X; Prot A; Tomizawa N; Xue H; Katabathina VS; Lopera JE; Jin Z
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Jan; 204(1):182-8. PubMed ID: 25539255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical usefulness of and problems with three-dimensional CT angiography for the evaluation of arteriosclerotic stenosis of the carotid artery: comparison with conventional angiography, MRA, and ultrasound sonography.
Sameshima T; Futami S; Morita Y; Yokogami K; Miyahara S; Sameshima Y; Goya T; Wakisaka S
Surg Neurol; 1999 Mar; 51(3):301-8; discussion 308-9. PubMed ID: 10086495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. CT versus MR Techniques in the Detection of Cervical Artery Dissection.
Hanning U; Sporns PB; Schmiedel M; Ringelstein EB; Heindel W; Wiendl H; Niederstadt T; Dittrich R
J Neuroimaging; 2017 Nov; 27(6):607-612. PubMed ID: 28574627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. CT angiography of the common carotid artery bifurcation: comparison between two techniques and conventional angiography.
Castillo M; Wilson JD
Neuroradiology; 1994 Nov; 36(8):602-4. PubMed ID: 7862273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of multidetector CT angiography and MR imaging of cervical artery dissection.
Vertinsky AT; Schwartz NE; Fischbein NJ; Rosenberg J; Albers GW; Zaharchuk G
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2008 Oct; 29(9):1753-60. PubMed ID: 18635617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
