These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21532415)

  • 1. Interval cranioplasty: comparison of current standards.
    Sultan SM; Davidson EH; Butala P; Schachar JS; Witek L; Szpalski C; Ricci JL; Saadeh PB; Warren SM
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2011 May; 127(5):1855-1864. PubMed ID: 21532415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Autologous Bone Cranioplasty: A Retrospective Comparative Analysis of Frozen and Subcutaneous Bone Flap Storage Methods.
    Rosinski CL; Chaker AN; Zakrzewski J; Geever B; Patel S; Chiu RG; Rosenberg DM; Parola R; Shah K; Behbahani M; Mehta AI
    World Neurosurg; 2019 Nov; 131():e312-e320. PubMed ID: 31351936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cranioplasty with subcutaneously preserved autologous bone grafts.
    Movassaghi K; Ver Halen J; Ganchi P; Amin-Hanjani S; Mesa J; Yaremchuk MJ
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2006 Jan; 117(1):202-6. PubMed ID: 16404268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Autogenous skull cranioplasty: fresh and preserved (frozen), with consideration of the cellular response.
    Prolo DJ; Burres KP; McLaughlin WT; Christensen AH
    Neurosurgery; 1979 Jan; 4(1):18-29. PubMed ID: 450211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Composite autogeneic human cranioplasty: frozen skull supplemented with fresh iliac corticocancellous bone.
    Prolo DJ; Oklund SA
    Neurosurgery; 1984 Dec; 15(6):846-51. PubMed ID: 6514157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cranioplasty: why throw the bone flap out?
    Flannery T; McConnell RS
    Br J Neurosurg; 2001 Dec; 15(6):518-20. PubMed ID: 11814006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Does difference in the storage method of bone flaps after decompressive craniectomy affect the incidence of surgical site infection after cranioplasty? Comparison between subcutaneous pocket and cryopreservation.
    Inamasu J; Kuramae T; Nakatsukasa M
    J Trauma; 2010 Jan; 68(1):183-7; discussion 187. PubMed ID: 20065773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cranioplasty with a frozen and autoclaved bone flap.
    Osawa M; Hara H; Ichinose Y; Koyama T; Kobayashi S; Sugita Y
    Acta Neurochir (Wien); 1990; 102(1-2):38-41. PubMed ID: 2305650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Characterization of matrix-induced osteogenesis in rat calvarial bone defects: I. Differences in the cellular response to demineralized bone matrix implanted in calvarial defects and in subcutaneous sites.
    Wang J; Glimcher MJ
    Calcif Tissue Int; 1999 Aug; 65(2):156-65. PubMed ID: 10430651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cranioplasty With Autogenous Frozen and Autoclaved Bone: Management and Treatment Outcomes.
    Sahoo NK; Thakral A; Janjani L
    J Craniofac Surg; 2019 Oct; 30(7):2069-2072. PubMed ID: 31490439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of bone dust with other types of bone grafts for cranioplasty.
    Karamese M; Toksoz MR; Selimoglu MN; Akdağ O; Toy H; Tosun Z
    J Craniofac Surg; 2014 Jul; 25(4):1155-8. PubMed ID: 25006886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Repair of experimental mandibular defects in rats with autogenous, demineralised, frozen and fresh bone.
    Redondo LM; Verrier Hernández A; García Cantera JM; Torres Nieto MA; Vaquero Puerta C
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1997 Jun; 35(3):166-9. PubMed ID: 9212291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of freezing on bone graft incorporation biomechanical evaluations in rats.
    Reikerås O
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2010 Feb; 25(2):177-80. PubMed ID: 19931957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [New tissue preservation method for bone flaps following decompressive craniotomy].
    Häuptli J; Segantini P
    Helv Chir Acta; 1980 Jun; 47(1-2):121-4. PubMed ID: 6449487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of calvarial burring on resorption of onlay cranial bone graft.
    Hassanein AH; Clune JE; Mulliken JB; Arany PR; Rogers GF; Kulungowski AM; Greene AK
    J Craniofac Surg; 2012 Sep; 23(5):1495-8. PubMed ID: 22976644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The use of bone grafts and alloplastic materials in cranioplasty.
    Prolo DJ; Oklund SA
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1991 Jul; (268):270-8. PubMed ID: 2060219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fresh, frozen, or decalcified bone grafts: a study of early vascularisation and mineralisation of allogeneic and syngeneic bone grafts in rats.
    Kirkeby OJ; Pinholt E; Larsen TB
    Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg; 1992; 26(2):141-5. PubMed ID: 1384116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reconstruction of skull defects in children and adolescents by the use of fixed cranial bone grafts: long-term results.
    Posnick JC; Goldstein JA; Armstrong D; Rutka JT
    Neurosurgery; 1993 May; 32(5):785-91; discussion 791. PubMed ID: 8492853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cryopreservation of mature teeth before replantation in monkeys (I). Effect of different cryoprotective agents and freezing devices.
    Schwartz O; Andreasen JO
    Int J Oral Surg; 1983 Dec; 12(6):425-36. PubMed ID: 6425233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The long-term fate of fresh and frozen orthotopic bone allografts in genetically defined rats.
    Bos GD; Goldberg VM; Gordon NH; Dollinger BM; Zika JM; Powell AE; Heiple KG
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1985; (197):245-54. PubMed ID: 3893828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.