227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21532515)
1. Crowding in children's visual acuity tests--effect of test design and age.
Norgett Y; Siderov J
Optom Vis Sci; 2011 Aug; 88(8):920-7. PubMed ID: 21532515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The logMAR Kay picture test and the logMAR acuity test: a comparative study.
Elliott MC; Firth AY
Eye (Lond); 2009 Jan; 23(1):85-8. PubMed ID: 17901881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Crowded letter and crowded picture logMAR acuity in children with amblyopia: a quantitative comparison.
O'Boyle C; Chen SI; Little JA
Br J Ophthalmol; 2017 Apr; 101(4):457-461. PubMed ID: 27388249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effects of blur and eccentric viewing on adult acuity for pediatric tests: implications for amblyopia detection.
Formankiewicz MA; Waugh SJ
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2013 Oct; 54(10):6934-43. PubMed ID: 24071956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Visual acuity assessment: a comparison of two tests for measuring children's vision.
Jones D; Westall C; Averbeck K; Abdolell M
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2003 Nov; 23(6):541-6. PubMed ID: 14622358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of colored crowding bars on the HOTV visual acuity test in amblyopic patients.
Ruttum MS; Covert DJ
J AAPOS; 2008 Aug; 12(4):361-4. PubMed ID: 18708008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mesopic visual acuity is less crowded.
Pluháček F; Siderov J
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2018 Sep; 256(9):1739-1746. PubMed ID: 29808376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Modified Allen pictures to assess amblyopia in young children.
Mayer DL; Gross RD
Ophthalmology; 1990 Jun; 97(6):827-32. PubMed ID: 2374689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The differing impact of induced astigmatic blur on crowded and uncrowded paediatric visual acuity chart results.
Little JA; Molloy J; Saunders KJ
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2012 Nov; 32(6):492-500. PubMed ID: 23009274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Validation of printed and computerised crowded Kay picture logMAR tests against gold standard ETDRS acuity test chart measurements in adult and amblyopic paediatric subjects.
Shah N; Laidlaw DA; Rashid S; Hysi P
Eye (Lond); 2012 Apr; 26(4):593-600. PubMed ID: 22193878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of simulated refractive error on adult visual acuity for paediatric tests.
Paudel N; Jacobs RJ; Sloan R; Denny S; Shea K; Thompson B; Anstice N
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2017 Jul; 37(4):521-530. PubMed ID: 28656671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of stimulus configuration on crowding in strabismic amblyopia.
Norgett Y; Siderov J
J Vis; 2017 Nov; 17(13):5. PubMed ID: 29114805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Development of visual line acuity in humans.
Hohmann A; Haase W
Ophthalmic Res; 1982; 14(2):107-12. PubMed ID: 7088495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of the HOTV and Lea symbols visual acuity tests in patients with amblyopia.
Ruttum MS; Dahlgren M
J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 2006; 43(3):157-60. PubMed ID: 16761636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Do picture-based charts overestimate visual acuity? Comparison of Kay Pictures, Lea Symbols, HOTV and Keeler logMAR charts with Sloan letters in adults and children.
Anstice NS; Jacobs RJ; Simkin SK; Thomson M; Thompson B; Collins AV
PLoS One; 2017; 12(2):e0170839. PubMed ID: 28152076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Using the KM visual acuity chart for more reliable evaluation of amblyopia compared to the HVOT method.
Moutakis K; Stigmar G; Hall-Lindberg J
Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2004 Oct; 82(5):547-51. PubMed ID: 15453851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of letter separation on computerised visual acuity measurements: comparison with the gold standard Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart.
Shah N; Laidlaw DA; Brown G; Robson C
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2010 Mar; 30(2):200-3. PubMed ID: 20444125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of visual acuity measurements via three different methods in preschool children: Lea symbols, crowded Lea symbols, Snellen E chart.
Inal A; Ocak OB; Aygit ED; Yilmaz I; Inal B; Taskapili M; Gokyigit B
Int Ophthalmol; 2018 Aug; 38(4):1385-1391. PubMed ID: 28639088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparing a traditional single optotype visual acuity test with a computer-based visual acuity test for childhood amblyopia vision screening: a pilot study.
Schlenker MB; Christakis TJ; Braga-Mele RM
Can J Ophthalmol; 2010 Aug; 45(4):368-74. PubMed ID: 20648081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of the amblyopia treatment study HOTV and electronic-early treatment of diabetic retinopathy study visual acuity protocols in children aged 5 to 12 years.
Rice ML; Leske DA; Holmes JM
Am J Ophthalmol; 2004 Feb; 137(2):278-82. PubMed ID: 14962417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
