These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21532515)

  • 21. Crowding and visual acuity measured in adults using paediatric test letters, pictures and symbols.
    Lalor SJH; Formankiewicz MA; Waugh SJ
    Vision Res; 2016 Apr; 121():31-38. PubMed ID: 26878696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Preschool vision screening: negative predictive value for amblyopia.
    Newman DK; East MM
    Br J Ophthalmol; 1999 Jun; 83(6):676-9. PubMed ID: 10340974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Improving the reliability of visual acuity measures in young children.
    McGraw PV; Winn B; Gray LS; Elliott DB
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2000 May; 20(3):173-84. PubMed ID: 10897339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Screening for amblyopia: a comparison of paediatric letter tests.
    Simmers AJ; Gray LS; Spowart K
    Br J Ophthalmol; 1997 Jun; 81(6):465-9. PubMed ID: 9274410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Method for identifying amblyopes whose reduced line acuity is caused by defective selection and/or control of gaze.
    Regan D; Giaschi DE; Kraft SP; Kothe AC
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1992 Oct; 12(4):425-32. PubMed ID: 1293529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Foveal crowding differs in children and adults.
    Norgett Y; Siderov J
    J Vis; 2014 Oct; 14(12):. PubMed ID: 25342540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Preliminary report: examination of young children with Lea symbols.
    Becker RH; Hübsch SH; Gräf MH; Kaufmann H
    Strabismus; 2000 Sep; 8(3):209-13. PubMed ID: 11035563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Clinical usefulness of the teller acuity cards test in preliterate children and its correlation with optotype test: A retrospective study.
    Joo HJ; Yi HC; Choi DG
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(6):e0235290. PubMed ID: 32598392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Combination of 2 test methods, single-picture optotype visual acuity chart and spot™ vision screener, in the eye health screening program for 3-year-old children in Tokyo: A retrospective, observational study.
    Kumanomido T; Murasugi H; Miyaji A; Sunohara D; Suzuki M; Uno S; Watanabe H
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2024 Jun; 103(25):e38488. PubMed ID: 38905427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Is the Cardiff Acuity Test effective in detecting refractive errors in children?
    Howard C; Firth AY
    Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Aug; 83(8):577-81. PubMed ID: 16909076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Assessment of Visual Acuity in Children Using Crowded Lea Symbol Charts.
    Sailoganathan A; Rou LX; Buja KA; Siderov J
    Optom Vis Sci; 2018 Aug; 95(8):643-647. PubMed ID: 30063661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Preliminary clinical validation of a new picture-based visual acuity test in children with amblyopia: a comparison of The Auckland Optotypes and crowded logMAR letters.
    McVeigh EM; Ludden SM; Mohamed S; Shah N; Mulholland PJ; Dahlmann-Noor A
    Eye (Lond); 2022 Dec; 36(12):2341-2345. PubMed ID: 34987195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Visual acuity testing of young children with the Cambridge Crowding Cards at 3 and 6 m.
    Atkinson J; Anker S; Evans C; Hall R; Pimm-Smith E
    Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh); 1988 Oct; 66(5):505-8. PubMed ID: 3218472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Crowding in central vision in normally sighted and visually impaired [corrected] children aged 4 to 8 years: the influence of age and test design.
    Huurneman B; Boonstra FN; Cillessen AH; van Rens G; Cox RF
    Strabismus; 2012 Jun; 20(2):55-62. PubMed ID: 22612353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effect of scoring and termination rules on test-retest variability of a novel high-pass letter acuity chart.
    Shah N; Dakin SC; Whitaker HL; Anderson RS
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2014 Mar; 55(3):1386-92. PubMed ID: 24519424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Use of log-scaled crowded visual acuity charts in clinical studies regarding amblyopia.
    Mataftsi A; Kappos N; Riga P; Kokkali S; Malamaki P; Brazitikos P; Haidich AB
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2019 Mar; 257(3):639-644. PubMed ID: 30675642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Should tumbling E go out of date in amblyopia screening? Evidence from a population-based sample normative in children aged 3-4 years.
    Guimaraes S; Fernandes T; Costa P; Silva E
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2018 Jun; 102(6):761-766. PubMed ID: 28988161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Assessment of visual acuity in children aged 1 1/2-6 years, with normal and subnormal vision.
    Rydberg A; Ericson B; Lennerstrand G; Jacobson L; Lindstedt E
    Strabismus; 1999 Mar; 7(1):1-24. PubMed ID: 10401500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The Sonksen logMAR test of visual acuity: II. Age norms from 2 years 9 months to 8 years.
    Sonksen PM; Wade AM; Proffitt R; Heavens S; Salt AT
    J AAPOS; 2008 Feb; 12(1):18-22. PubMed ID: 17651997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Comparison of visual acuity measured using Landolt-C and ETDRS charts in healthy subjects and patients with various eye diseases].
    Becker R; Teichler G; Gräf M
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2011 Oct; 228(10):864-7. PubMed ID: 21997822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.