These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21532691)

  • 1. Error propagation: a comparison of Shack-Hartmann and curvature sensors.
    Kellerer AN; Kellerer AM
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2011 May; 28(5):801-7. PubMed ID: 21532691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Revisiting the comparison between the Shack-Hartmann and the pyramid wavefront sensors via the Fisher information matrix.
    Plantet C; Meimon S; Conan JM; Fusco T
    Opt Express; 2015 Nov; 23(22):28619-33. PubMed ID: 26561131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Tomographic wavefront error using multi-LGS constellation sensed with Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensors.
    Robert C; Conan JM; Gratadour D; Schreiber L; Fusco T
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2010 Nov; 27(11):A201-15. PubMed ID: 21045881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Performance comparison between Shack-Hartmann and astigmatic hybrid wavefront sensors.
    Barwick S
    Appl Opt; 2009 Dec; 48(36):6967-72. PubMed ID: 20029599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Curvature sensors: noise and its propagation.
    Kellerer A
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2010 Nov; 27(11):A29-36. PubMed ID: 21045888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Wavefront measurements of phase plates combining a point-diffraction interferometer and a Hartmann-Shack sensor.
    Bueno JM; Acosta E; Schwarz C; Artal P
    Appl Opt; 2010 Jan; 49(3):450-6. PubMed ID: 20090810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Real-time turbulence profiling with a pair of laser guide star Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensors for wide-field adaptive optics systems on large to extremely large telescopes.
    Gilles L; Ellerbroek BL
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2010 Nov; 27(11):A76-83. PubMed ID: 21045893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Improvement in error propagation in the Shack-Hartmann-type zonal wavefront sensors.
    Pathak B; Boruah BR
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2017 Dec; 34(12):2194-2202. PubMed ID: 29240094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Algorithm and experiment of whole-aperture wavefront reconstruction from annular subaperture Hartmann-Shack gradient data.
    Xu H; Xian H; Zhang Y
    Opt Express; 2010 Jun; 18(13):13431-43. PubMed ID: 20588474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Study of a MEMS-based Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensor with adjustable pupil sampling for astronomical adaptive optics.
    Baranec C; Dekany R
    Appl Opt; 2008 Oct; 47(28):5155-62. PubMed ID: 18830305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Wavefront error measurement of high-numerical-aperture optics with a Shack-Hartmann sensor and a point source.
    Lee JS; Yang HS; Hahn JW
    Appl Opt; 2007 Mar; 46(9):1411-5. PubMed ID: 17334430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Adaptable Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensor with diffractive lenslet arrays to mitigate the effects of scintillation.
    Lechner D; Zepp A; Eichhorn M; Gładysz S
    Opt Express; 2020 Nov; 28(24):36188-36205. PubMed ID: 33379719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Tolerance analysis method for Shack-Hartmann sensors using a variable phase surface.
    Curatu C; Curatu G; Rolland J
    Opt Express; 2006 Jan; 14(1):138-47. PubMed ID: 19503325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fundamental performance comparison of a Hartmann and a shearing interferometer wave-front sensor.
    Welsh BM; Ellerbroek BL; Roggemann MC; Pennington TL
    Appl Opt; 1995 Jul; 34(21):4186-95. PubMed ID: 21052244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Hartmann-Shack wavefront sensing without a lenslet array using a digital micromirror device.
    Vohnsen B; Carmichael Martins A; Qaysi S; Sharmin N
    Appl Opt; 2018 Aug; 57(22):E199-E204. PubMed ID: 30117885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Experimental comparison of a Shack-Hartmann sensor and a phase-shifting interferometer for large-optics metrology applications.
    Koch JA; Presta RW; Sacks RA; Zacharias RA; Bliss ES; Dailey MJ; Feldman M; Grey AA; Holdener FR; Salmon JT; Seppala LG; Toeppen JS; Van Atta L; Van Wonterghem BM; Whistler WT; Winters SE; Woods BW
    Appl Opt; 2000 Sep; 39(25):4540-6. PubMed ID: 18350042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Precise calibration of pupil images in pyramid wavefront sensor.
    Liu Y; Mu Q; Cao Z; Hu L; Yang C; Xuan L
    Appl Opt; 2017 Apr; 56(12):3281-3286. PubMed ID: 28430247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensing using spatial-temporal data from an event-based image sensor.
    Kong F; Lambert A; Joubert D; Cohen G
    Opt Express; 2020 Nov; 28(24):36159-36175. PubMed ID: 33379717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Shack-Hartmann versus reverse Hartmann wavefront sensors: experimental results.
    Pannetier C; Hénault F
    Opt Lett; 2020 Apr; 45(7):1746-1749. PubMed ID: 32235989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Extended scene Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensor algorithm: minimization of scene content dependent shift estimation errors.
    Sidick E
    Appl Opt; 2013 Sep; 52(26):6487-96. PubMed ID: 24085124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.