765 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21533652)
1. Definition and testing of the GROMOS force-field versions 54A7 and 54B7.
Schmid N; Eichenberger AP; Choutko A; Riniker S; Winger M; Mark AE; van Gunsteren WF
Eur Biophys J; 2011 Jul; 40(7):843-56. PubMed ID: 21533652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Refinement of the application of the GROMOS 54A7 force field to β-peptides.
Lin Z; van Gunsteren WF
J Comput Chem; 2013 Dec; 34(32):2796-805. PubMed ID: 24122968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Testing of the GROMOS Force-Field Parameter Set 54A8: Structural Properties of Electrolyte Solutions, Lipid Bilayers, and Proteins.
Reif MM; Winger M; Oostenbrink C
J Chem Theory Comput; 2013 Feb; 9(2):1247-1264. PubMed ID: 23418406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Validation of the GROMOS 54A7 Force Field with Respect to β-Peptide Folding.
Huang W; Lin Z; van Gunsteren WF
J Chem Theory Comput; 2011 May; 7(5):1237-43. PubMed ID: 26610119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A biomolecular force field based on the free enthalpy of hydration and solvation: the GROMOS force-field parameter sets 53A5 and 53A6.
Oostenbrink C; Villa A; Mark AE; van Gunsteren WF
J Comput Chem; 2004 Oct; 25(13):1656-76. PubMed ID: 15264259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validation of the 53A6 GROMOS force field.
Oostenbrink C; Soares TA; van der Vegt NF; van Gunsteren WF
Eur Biophys J; 2005 Jun; 34(4):273-84. PubMed ID: 15803330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Conformational state-specific free energy differences by one-step perturbation: protein secondary structure preferences of the GROMOS 43A1 and 53A6 force fields.
Lin Z; Van Gunsteren WF; Liu H
J Comput Chem; 2011 Jul; 32(10):2290-7. PubMed ID: 21541965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. GROMOS 53A6GLYC, an Improved GROMOS Force Field for Hexopyranose-Based Carbohydrates.
Pol-Fachin L; Rusu VH; Verli H; Lins RD
J Chem Theory Comput; 2012 Nov; 8(11):4681-90. PubMed ID: 26605624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Impact of Using Single Atomistic Long-Range Cutoff Schemes with the GROMOS 54A7 Force Field.
Silva TFD; Vila-Viçosa D; Reis PBPS; Victor BL; Diem M; Oostenbrink C; Machuqueiro M
J Chem Theory Comput; 2018 Nov; 14(11):5823-5833. PubMed ID: 30354115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Molecular dynamics simulation of thionated hen egg white lysozyme.
Huang W; Eichenberger AP; van Gunsteren WF
Protein Sci; 2012 Aug; 21(8):1153-61. PubMed ID: 22653637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Validation of the GROMOS force-field parameter set 45Alpha3 against nuclear magnetic resonance data of hen egg lysozyme.
Soares TA; Daura X; Oostenbrink C; Smith LJ; van Gunsteren WF
J Biomol NMR; 2004 Dec; 30(4):407-22. PubMed ID: 15630561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Refining the description of peptide backbone conformations improves protein simulations using the GROMOS 53A6 force field.
Cao Z; Lin Z; Wang J; Liu H
J Comput Chem; 2009 Mar; 30(4):645-60. PubMed ID: 18780355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. How sensitive are nanosecond molecular dynamics simulations of proteins to changes in the force field?
Villa A; Fan H; Wassenaar T; Mark AE
J Phys Chem B; 2007 May; 111(21):6015-25. PubMed ID: 17489626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Force field evaluation for biomolecular simulation: free enthalpies of solvation of polar and apolar compounds in various solvents.
Geerke DP; van Gunsteren WF
Chemphyschem; 2006 Mar; 7(3):671-8. PubMed ID: 16514695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reoptimized interaction parameters for the peptide-backbone model compound N-methylacetamide in the GROMOS force field: influence on the folding properties of two beta-peptides in methanol.
Horta BA; Lin Z; Huang W; Riniker S; van Gunsteren WF; Hünenberger PH
J Comput Chem; 2012 Sep; 33(24):1907-17. PubMed ID: 22648867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Update on phosphate and charged post-translationally modified amino acid parameters in the GROMOS force field.
Margreitter C; Reif MM; Oostenbrink C
J Comput Chem; 2017 Apr; 38(10):714-720. PubMed ID: 28120339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Molecular dynamics simulation of hen egg white lysozyme: a test of the GROMOS96 force field against nuclear magnetic resonance data.
Stocker U; van Gunsteren WF
Proteins; 2000 Jul; 40(1):145-53. PubMed ID: 10813839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Lipid Bilayers: The Effect of Force Field on Ordering and Dynamics.
Poger D; Mark AE
J Chem Theory Comput; 2012 Nov; 8(11):4807-17. PubMed ID: 26605633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Validation and Comparison of Force Fields for Native Cyclodextrins in Aqueous Solution.
Gebhardt J; Kleist C; Jakobtorweihen S; Hansen N
J Phys Chem B; 2018 Feb; 122(5):1608-1626. PubMed ID: 29287148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Amine hydration: a united-atom force-field solution.
Oostenbrink C; Juchli D; van Gunsteren WF
Chemphyschem; 2005 Sep; 6(9):1800-4. PubMed ID: 16075431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
