These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

318 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21533663)

  • 1. Oropharyngeal leak pressure with the laryngeal mask airway Supreme™ at different intracuff pressures: a randomized controlled trial.
    Zhang L; Seet E; Mehta V; Subramanyam R; Ankichetty SP; Wong DT; Chung F
    Can J Anaesth; 2011 Jul; 58(7):624-629. PubMed ID: 21533663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Safety and efficacy of laryngeal mask airway Supreme versus laryngeal mask airway ProSeal: a randomized controlled trial.
    Seet E; Rajeev S; Firoz T; Yousaf F; Wong J; Wong DT; Chung F
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2010 Jul; 27(7):602-7. PubMed ID: 20540172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The randomized crossover comparison of airway sealing with the laryngeal mask airway Supreme(™) at three different intracuff pressures in children.
    Choi KW; Lee JR; Oh JT; Kim DW; Kim MS
    Paediatr Anaesth; 2014 Oct; 24(10):1080-7. PubMed ID: 25059727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A randomized comparison of the laryngeal mask airway supreme™ and laryngeal mask airway unique™ in infants and children: does cuff pressure influence leak pressure?
    Jagannathan N; Sohn L; Sommers K; Belvis D; Shah RD; Sawardekar A; Eidem J; Dagraca J; Mukherji I
    Paediatr Anaesth; 2013 Oct; 23(10):927-33. PubMed ID: 23521105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Use of manometry for laryngeal mask airway reduces postoperative pharyngolaryngeal adverse events: a prospective, randomized trial.
    Seet E; Yousaf F; Gupta S; Subramanyam R; Wong DT; Chung F
    Anesthesiology; 2010 Mar; 112(3):652-7. PubMed ID: 20179502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Oropharyngeal leak pressure of the LMA Protector™ vs the LMA Supreme™; a prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial.
    Moser B; Keller C; Audigé L; Bruppacher HR
    Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2019 Mar; 63(3):322-328. PubMed ID: 30229857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Application of Minimum Effective Cuff Inflating Volume for Laryngeal Mask Airway and its Impact on Postoperative Pharyngeal Complications.
    Li BB; Yan J; Zhou HG; Hao J; Liu AJ; Ma ZL
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2015 Oct; 128(19):2570-6. PubMed ID: 26415792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Laryngeal mask airway protector generates higher oropharyngeal leak pressures compared to the laryngeal mask airway supreme: A randomized clinical trial in the ambulatory surgery unit.
    Acx E; Van Caelenberg E; De Baerdemaeker L; Coppens M
    J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol; 2021; 37(2):221-225. PubMed ID: 34349370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of Laryngeal Mask Airway Supreme and Laryngeal Mask Airway Proseal with respect to oropharyngeal leak pressure during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomised controlled trial.
    Beleña JM; Núñez M; Anta D; Carnero M; Gracia JL; Ayala JL; Alvarez R; Yuste J
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2013 Mar; 30(3):119-23. PubMed ID: 23318811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of the disposable versus the reusable laryngeal mask airway in paralyzed adult patients.
    Brimacombe J; Keller C; Morris R; Mecklem D
    Anesth Analg; 1998 Oct; 87(4):921-4. PubMed ID: 9768795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The laryngeal mask airway Supreme--a single use laryngeal mask airway with an oesophageal vent. A randomised, cross-over study with the laryngeal mask airway ProSeal in paralysed, anaesthetised patients.
    Eschertzhuber S; Brimacombe J; Hohlrieder M; Keller C
    Anaesthesia; 2009 Jan; 64(1):79-83. PubMed ID: 19087011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of the reinforced and standard laryngeal mask airway: ease of insertion and the influence of head and neck position on oropharyngeal leak pressure and intracuff pressure.
    Buckham M; Brooker M; Brimacombe J; Keller C
    Anaesth Intensive Care; 1999 Dec; 27(6):628-31. PubMed ID: 10631418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. LMA Supreme™ vs i-gel™--a comparison of insertion success in novices.
    Ragazzi R; Finessi L; Farinelli I; Alvisi R; Volta CA
    Anaesthesia; 2012 Apr; 67(4):384-8. PubMed ID: 22329593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of the flexible and standard laryngeal mask airways.
    Brimacombe J; Keller C
    Can J Anaesth; 1999 Jun; 46(6):558-63. PubMed ID: 10391603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Randomized crossover study assessing oropharyngeal leak pressure and fiber optic positioning : Laryngeal Mask Airway Supreme™ versus Laryngeal Tube LTS II™ size 2 in non-paralyzed anesthetized children.
    Gasteiger L; Ofner S; Stögermüller B; Ziegler B; Brimacombe J; Keller C
    Anaesthesist; 2016 Aug; 65(8):585-9. PubMed ID: 27380049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Use of second generation supra-glottic airway devices during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective, randomized comparison of LMA Proseal™, LMA SupremeTM and igel™.
    Belena JM; Nunez M; Vidal A; Gasco C; Gilsanz C; Alcojor A; Anta D; Lopez AE
    Acta Anaesthesiol Belg; 2016; 67(3):121-128. PubMed ID: 29873467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ambu® AuraGain™ versus LMA Supreme™ Second Seal™: a randomised controlled trial comparing oropharyngeal leak pressures and gastric drain functionality in spontaneously breathing patients.
    Shariffuddin II; Teoh WH; Tang E; Hashim N; Loh PS
    Anaesth Intensive Care; 2017 Mar; 45(2):244-250. PubMed ID: 28267947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A prospective randomized comparison of airway seal using the novel vision-guided insertion of LMA-Supreme® and LMA-Protector®.
    van Zundert AAJ; Wyssusek KH; Pelecanos A; Roets M; Kumar CM
    J Clin Monit Comput; 2020 Apr; 34(2):285-294. PubMed ID: 30953222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of oropharyngeal leak pressure of air-Q™, i-gel™, and laryngeal mask airway supreme™ in adult patients during general anesthesia: A randomized controlled trial.
    Damodaran S; Sethi S; Malhotra SK; Samra T; Maitra S; Saini V
    Saudi J Anaesth; 2017; 11(4):390-395. PubMed ID: 29033717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A randomized comparison of the Ambu AuraGain versus the LMA supreme in patients undergoing gynaecologic laparoscopic surgery.
    Lopez AM; Agusti M; Gambus P; Pons M; Anglada T; Valero R
    J Clin Monit Comput; 2017 Dec; 31(6):1255-1262. PubMed ID: 27889843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.