These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21533921)

  • 21. Additivity of abrupt onset effects supports nonspatial distraction, not the capture of spatial attention.
    Folk CL; Remington RW; Wu SC
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Feb; 71(2):308-13. PubMed ID: 19304620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Do new objects capture attention?
    Franconeri SL; Hollingworth A; Simons DJ
    Psychol Sci; 2005 Apr; 16(4):275-81. PubMed ID: 15828974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Are changes in semantic and structural information sufficient for oculomotor capture?
    Wong JH; Peterson MS; Hillstrom AP
    J Vis; 2007 Sep; 7(12):3.1-10. PubMed ID: 17997645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Should I stay or should I go? Attentional disengagement from visually unique and unexpected items at fixation.
    Brockmole JR; Boot WR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Jun; 35(3):808-15. PubMed ID: 19485693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Goal-driven modulation of oculomotor capture.
    Ludwig CJ; Gilchrist ID
    Percept Psychophys; 2003 Nov; 65(8):1243-51. PubMed ID: 14710959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Irrelevant onsets cause inhibition of return regardless of attentional set.
    Schreij D; Theeuwes J; Olivers CN
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Oct; 72(7):1725-9. PubMed ID: 20952771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Feature binding in children and young adults.
    Lorsbach TC; Reimer JF
    J Genet Psychol; 2005 Sep; 166(3):313-27. PubMed ID: 16173674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Automatic selection of irrelevant object features through working memory: evidence for top-down attentional capture.
    Soto D; Humphreys GW
    Exp Psychol; 2009; 56(3):165-72. PubMed ID: 19289358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Endogenous saccade preparation does not produce inhibition of return: failure to replicate Rafal, Calabresi, Brennan, & Sciolto (1989).
    Chica AB; Klein RM; Rafal RD; Hopfinger JB
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Oct; 36(5):1193-206. PubMed ID: 20731522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Influence of attentional capture on oculomotor control.
    Theeuwes J; Kramer AF; Hahn S; Irwin DE; Zelinsky GJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1999 Dec; 25(6):1595-608. PubMed ID: 10641312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Shift and deviate: Saccades reveal that shifts of covert attention evoked by trained spatial stimuli are obligatory.
    Van der Stigchel S; Mills M; Dodd MD
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Jul; 72(5):1244-50. PubMed ID: 20601705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Do working memory-driven attention shifts speed up visual awareness?
    Pan Y; Cheng QP
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Nov; 73(8):2425-33. PubMed ID: 21837542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A new object captures attention--but only when you know it's new.
    Chua FK
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 May; 71(4):699-711. PubMed ID: 19429953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Dimension-based working memory-driven capture of visual selection.
    Pan Y; Xu B; Soto D
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Jun; 62(6):1123-31. PubMed ID: 19142832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Temporal limitations in the effective binding of attended target attributes in the mutual masking of visual objects.
    Hommuk K; Bachmann T
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Jun; 35(3):648-60. PubMed ID: 19485683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Abrupt onsets capture attention independent of top-down control settings II: additivity is no evidence for filtering.
    Schreij D; Theeuwes J; Olivers CN
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Apr; 72(3):672-82. PubMed ID: 20348574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Aging and involuntary attention capture: electrophysiological evidence for preserved attentional control with advanced age.
    Lien MC; Gemperle A; Ruthruff E
    Psychol Aging; 2011 Mar; 26(1):188-202. PubMed ID: 20973601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Awareness of the saccade goal in oculomotor selection: your eyes go before you know.
    van Zoest W; Donk M
    Conscious Cogn; 2010 Dec; 19(4):861-71. PubMed ID: 20418114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Oculomotor capture and Inhibition of Return: evidence for an oculomotor suppression account of IOR.
    Godijn R; Theeuwes J
    Psychol Res; 2002 Nov; 66(4):234-46. PubMed ID: 12466922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Consolidation of multifeature items in visual working memory: central capacity requirements for visual consolidation.
    Stevanovski B; Jolicœur P
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 May; 73(4):1108-19. PubMed ID: 21327744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.