217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21534141)
1. The role of controversial research in the IRB's risk/benefit analysis.
Lunstroth J
Am J Bioeth; 2011 May; 11(5):14-6. PubMed ID: 21534141
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. IRBs and the long-term social implications of research.
de Melo-Martin I
Am J Bioeth; 2011 May; 11(5):22-3. PubMed ID: 21534145
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The need for topically focused efforts to deal with the long-term social implications of research.
Benya F
Am J Bioeth; 2011 May; 11(5):19-20. PubMed ID: 21534143
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Designing a disconnect?
White GB
Am J Bioeth; 2011 May; 11(5):20-2. PubMed ID: 21534144
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Ethics. Human health research ethics.
Silbergeld E; Lerman S; Hushka L
Science; 2004 Aug; 305(5686):949. PubMed ID: 15310879
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Women in early phase trials: an IRB's deliberations.
Anderson JR; Schonfeld TL; Kelso TK; Prentice ED
IRB; 2003; 25(4):7-11. PubMed ID: 14649248
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Competence and consent to research: a critique of the recommendations of the National Bioethics Advisory Commission.
Appelbaum PS
Account Res; 1999; 7(2-4):265-76. PubMed ID: 11658181
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Power and representation of the public's values in a social implications of research commission.
Evans JH
Am J Bioeth; 2011 May; 11(5):10-1. PubMed ID: 21534139
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Ethical oversight of research in developing countries.
Kass N; Dawson L; Loyo-Berrios NI
IRB; 2003; 25(2):1-10. PubMed ID: 12833901
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Undue inducement: nonsense on stilts?
Emanuel EJ
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(5):9-13; discussion W8-11, W17. PubMed ID: 16179296
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Research involving children: regulations, review boards and reform.
Gandhi R
J Health Care Law Policy; 2005; 8(2):264-330. PubMed ID: 16471026
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Why the tolerance of potential harms? Research ethics in Alzheimer disease.
Post SG
Account Res; 1999; 7(2-4):241-53. PubMed ID: 11658179
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Ethics committees in USA--background and development. Responsible conductors of clinical trials required for risk minimization].
Lund LH
Lakartidningen; 2008 Jan 9-15; 105(1-2):42-4. PubMed ID: 18293746
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Challenges in a divided assessment of the social benefits and risks of research.
Wasserman D
Am J Bioeth; 2011 May; 11(5):12-3. PubMed ID: 21534140
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Special informed consent requirements are included in protocol review procedures.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 1995 Jul; 10(7):1-2. PubMed ID: 11654274
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Proposed requirements for informed consent go beyond current federal regulations.
Hum Res Rep; 1994 Jul; 9(7):1-3. PubMed ID: 11659879
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Fears mount for gene scrutiny as watchdog faces axe.
Kiernan V
New Sci; 1996 Jun; 150(2033):10. PubMed ID: 11656540
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Some questionable premises about research ethics.
Macklin R
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):29-31; author reply W15-8. PubMed ID: 16036652
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Dementia research: ethics and policy for the twenty-first century.
Dresser R
Georgia Law Rev; 2001; 35(2):661-90. PubMed ID: 15119320
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Research involving the newly dead: an institutional response.
DeVita MA; Wicclair M; Swanson D; Valenta C; Schold C; ;
Crit Care Med; 2003 May; 31(5 Suppl):S385-90. PubMed ID: 12771588
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
