119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21534155)
1. Research in pregnancy: back to first principles.
Shalowitz DI; Ecker JL
Am J Bioeth; 2011 May; 11(5):56-7. PubMed ID: 21534155
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The fetus as a patient and the ethics of human subjects research: response to commentaries on "An ethically justified framework for clinical investigation to benefit pregnant and fetal patients".
McCullough LB; Chervenak FA
Am J Bioeth; 2011 May; 11(5):W3-7. PubMed ID: 21534136
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Unacceptable risk in pregnancy: whose choice and responsibility?
Perry C
Am J Bioeth; 2011 May; 11(5):64-5. PubMed ID: 21534159
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The common rule, pregnant women, and research: no need to "rescue" that which should be revised.
Kaposy C; Baylis F
Am J Bioeth; 2011 May; 11(5):60-2. PubMed ID: 21534157
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. An ethically justified framework for clinical investigation to benefit pregnant and fetal patients.
Chervenak FA; McCullough LB
Am J Bioeth; 2011 May; 11(5):39-49. PubMed ID: 21534151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The subject-researcher relationship: in defense of contracting around default rules.
Meyer MN
Am J Bioeth; 2011 Apr; 11(4):27-30. PubMed ID: 21480072
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Response to open peer commentaries on "assessing the remedy: the case for contracts in clinical trials".
Edwards SJ
Am J Bioeth; 2011 Apr; 11(4):W1-3. PubMed ID: 21480062
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Reframing the framework: toward fair inclusion of pregnant women as participants in research.
Lyerly AD; Little MO; Faden RR
Am J Bioeth; 2011 May; 11(5):50-2. PubMed ID: 21534152
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Ethics of medical care and clinical research: a qualitative study of principal investigators in biomedical HIV prevention research.
Haire BG
J Med Ethics; 2013 Apr; 39(4):231-5. PubMed ID: 23175459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. "Through a glass darkly": researcher ethnocentrism and the demonization of research participants.
Lynch JA
Am J Bioeth; 2011 Apr; 11(4):22-3. PubMed ID: 21480069
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Bounty-hunting and finder's fees.
Christensen JA; Orlowski JP
IRB; 2005; 27(3):16-9. PubMed ID: 16021797
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical trials and physicians as double agents.
Levine RJ
Yale J Biol Med; 1992; 65(2):65-74. PubMed ID: 1519378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Protection of children in research: beyond pediatric risk levels: the emergence of the research subject advocate.
Silber TJ
J Clin Ethics; 2010; 21(3):221-3. PubMed ID: 21089991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cancer research and therapy: a view from Norway.
Ruyter KW
Perspectives Prof; 2000; 20(1):E5. PubMed ID: 15115042
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The two-patient framework for research during pregnancy: a critique and a better way forward.
Liaschenko J; DeBruin D; Marshall MF
Am J Bioeth; 2011 May; 11(5):66-8. PubMed ID: 21534160
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The case against contract: participant and investigator duty in clinical trials.
De Ville K
Am J Bioeth; 2011 Apr; 11(4):16-8. PubMed ID: 21480066
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Role-differentiated morality: the need to consider institutions, not just individuals.
Lindsay RA
Am J Bioeth; 2006; 6(4):70-2; discussion W42-5. PubMed ID: 16885115
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Clarifying the ethics of clinical research: a path toward avoiding the therapeutic misconception.
Appelbaum PS
Am J Bioeth; 2002; 2(2):22-3. PubMed ID: 12189066
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Who is a patient and why does it matter?
Iltis AS
Am J Bioeth; 2011 May; 11(5):62-4. PubMed ID: 21534158
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The patient and the public good.
Hellman S
Monash Bioeth Rev; 1996 Jan; 15(1):S5-10. PubMed ID: 15810187
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
